#jury

7 posts · Last used 8d

Back to Timeline
Nonilex @Nonilex@masto.ai · Aug 05, 2026
Replying to @Nonilex@masto.ai
Mehta had sentenced Rhodes to 18 years in prison & imposed lesser prison terms on other top #OathKeepers who were #convicted at #jury trials. #Trump commuted those prison sentences on his first day in office last year, & he pardoned more than 1,500 rioters. #whitewashing #RevisionistHistory #propaganda #law #ElectionInterference #BigLie #coup #Jan6 #SeditiousConspiracy #authoritarianism #autocracy #dictatorship #fascism #tyranny
9
2
10
Katrina Katrinka :donor: @katrinakatrinka@infosec.exchange · Jul 11, 2026

I am 52 and was, for the very first time, called in for jury duty. I have been sent jury notices before, but was always excused the night before (or during COVID, not chosen for a virtual jury).

I've always been curious. As a licensed CPA, I know and passed the legal portion of the CPA exam. I have wondered from time to time what it's like to work in law.

Wednesday morning, I reported to the Utah Justice court. They got 24 other people and me to report, showed us a video answering general jury duty questions and then had us come in to the courtroom. We were each handed a laminated page with questions, and in front of both legal teams, the court reporter, the baliff, and the judge, we each stood one by one and answered.

What I remember of the questions:

  1. Name
  2. Employer
  3. Job title
  4. Job duties
  5. Spouse's name 6-8. Questions 2-4 for spouse.
  6. Can you read and understand English?
  7. Do you live in Salt Lake County?
  8. Name and ages of children.
  9. Hobbies/interests
  10. Where do you get your news?
  11. What's your favorite TV/movie?

Some interesting things. There were a few retirees who had to do math to calculate their kids' ages. One gal had 8 boys and the judge was like, "Just give us the age range."

There were a few LGBTQ people, which was nice to see, and their spouse/children details were rattled off the same as everyone else. The judge was black, but there weren't any black jurors. Just white and Hispanic.

One thing that made me cringe. I was the only one who subscribes to the Salt Lake Tribune, Utah News Dispatch or any other local news. Some mentioned NY Times subscriptions. Some actively avoided news to protect their mental health. Most didn't seek out news, but got it on social media. Two said Facebook.

We were asked if we couldn't trust police as some would be testifying. I figured I could set aside my auto ACAB as I was raised to accept and seek help from police, but when we were shown the potential witnesses, I noticed some tattoos on the officer that made me suspicious. I looked them up later, and couldn't find any white supremacy meanings, but I did have to think about it in the moment.

One other thing that surprised me was only 4 jurors and one alternate were chosen for the one day trial. I wonder if that hinders people from getting a fair trial.

We were asked about experiences with domestic violence as that was a few of the charges. I was doubtful because I was #16 and I work for a DV prevention nonprofit that I'd be chosen and I wasn't, but they did chose one retired gal who led a group in Daughters of Utah Pioneers whose son was killed by his son, so I am curious how that went.

I really needed to go to work, so I couldn't excuse myself to take the day and watch the trial, but if it was a different month, I might've stayed to see the details of the case and how the jury ruled.

One thing I did learn? I'm glad I don't work in law. The judge did a lot of emotional work, making every juror feel welcome and comfortable and handling our understanding and expectations for how the day would go. I won't even learn to make coffee let alone do the other "female-coded" work that can be expected in an office. I would hate having to handle other people's emotions all day. And that's before I even saw her doing any work with the case itself. #Utah #Jury #JusticeCourt #SaltLakeCounty

0
0
0
GrumpyOldFart @GrumpyOldFart@expressional.social · Jun 19, 2026
“Breaking: ‘Moog 4’ walk free as jury refuses to convict” by Skwawkbox with The Canary @uk_politics @thecanaryuk@independent-media.co.uk @UKLabour@mastodon.cloud “The ‘Moog 4’ anti-genocide activists who were put on trial for direct action against an arms firm supplying Israel have walked free from Birmingham Crown Court today. The jury in the trial was split and refused to convict the activists despite the prosecution claiming the decision to convict would be ‘simple’” https://www.thecanary.co/skwawkbox/2026/06/18/moog-4-walk-free/ #Press #SocialMedia #UK #Moog4 #Trial #Acquittal #PalestinianGenocide #Israel #Jury
0
0
14
GrumpyOldFart @GrumpyOldFart@expressional.social · Jun 13, 2026
“‘WE WANTED TO SAVE LIVES’, PALESTINE ACTIVISTS TELL COURT” by John McEvoy in Declassified UK @palestine @iran @iraq@mastodon.social @palestinenews@gts.liberated.press @uk_politics @UKLabour@mastodon.cloud “A jury at Birmingham crown court is deliberating whether four pro-Palestine activists committed criminal damage at an arms factory in Wolverhampton. Defendants Iain Evans, Hisham Alkhamesi, Frank Sherman, and Hana Yun-Stevens believed the factory, used by arms firm Moog, supplied weaponry to Israel. They climbed onto the roof in August 2025, smashed equipment and unveiled a banner saying ‘Free Palestine’ while wearing T-shirts with the names of Palestinians killed in Israeli airstrikes” https://www.declassifieduk.org/we-wanted-to-save-lives-palestine-activists-tell-court/ #Press #SocialMedia #UK #Moog #ProPalestine #Weapons #Israel #Jury #Court #PalestinianGenocide #Gaza #Genocide #Israel
0
1
8
The Bad Place @TheBadPlace@mastodon.ozioso.online · Mar 27, 2026
Bloomberg Technology | How a Social Media Trial Verdict Threatens Big Tech by Peter Blumberg, Kurt Wagner A flood of lawsuits filed in recent years against social media giants claim that by engineering their platforms to be hard to resist, the companies are causing serious harm to young users. In the first case to go to trial, a jury on March 25 found Meta Platforms Inc. and Google negligent in the design and operation of their platforms – a landmark verdict. Read more: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-03-26/how-a-social-media-trial-verdict-threatens-big-tech #bigtech #socialmedia #jury #lawsuits #verdict
0
0
0
Nonilex @Nonilex@masto.ai · Mar 24, 2026
Replying to @Nonilex@masto.ai
Jurors sided with state prosecutors who argued that #Meta — which owns #Instagram, #Facebook & #WhatsApp — prioritized profits over #safety. The #jury determined Meta violated parts of the state’s Unfair Practices Act on accusations the company hid what it knew about the dangers of #child sexual #exploitation on its platforms & impacts on child #MentalHealth. #law #accountability #socialmedia #tech #business #moderation #ChildAbuse #pedophilia
23
2
11
Don Trueten :antifa: @thomas@mastodon.trueten.de · Mar 05, 2026
Den #Verfassungsschutz vorschreiben lassen, welche #Buchhandlung #Buchhandelspreiswürdig ist? No Way! Buchhandlungen kündigen juristische Schritte gegen den Beauftragten der Bundesregierung für Kultur und Medien und den Verfassungsschutz an Der Deutsche #Buchhandlungspreis wird jährlich an über einhundert Buchhandlungen verliehen. Welche #Buchhandlung mit dem Preis gewürdigt wird, entscheidet eine jährlich wechselnde #Jury von Fachleuten aus der #Buchbranche nach Durchsicht der Bewerbungsunterlagen. Die Abzeichnung der #Nominiertenliste durch den Beauftragten der #Bundesregierung für Kultur und Medien (BKM) war bisher reine Formsache. Wie die Süddeutsche Zeitung am 03.03.2026 berichtete, hat dieses Jahr der BKM drei der nominierten Buchhandlungen von der Liste gestrichen mit der Begründung, es lägen „verfassungsschutzrechtliche Erkenntnisse“ über sie vor. Der BKM griff mit dem sog. Haber-Verfahren in eine Entscheidung einer unabhängigen Jury ohne belastbare Begründung ein. Die von diesem Eingriff betroffenen drei linken Buchhandlungen Golden Shop (#Bremen), Rote Straße (#Göttingen) und Zur schwankenden Weltkugel (#Berlin) gehen nun gerichtlich gegen die Streichung von der Preisliste vor. Mit den Rechtsanwält:innen Lea Voigt (Bremen), Sven Adam (Göttingen), Dr. Jasper Prigge und Sophie Hartmann (Düsseldorf) sowie mit Unterstüzung des #Gegenrechtsschutzes von #FragDenStaat und der Gesellschaft für Freiheitsrechte (#GFF) setzen sich die Buchhandlungen auch gegen das rechtsstaatlich fragwürdige sog. Haber-Verfahren und die verdeckte Einflussnahme durch den #Verfassungsschutz zur Wehr. (...) Mehr dazu.
16
1
16

You've seen all posts