Labor is responsible for all results of production (positive and negative).
Remote
An #EconomicDemocracy is a market economy where most firms are structured as #WorkerCoops.
0
Followers
0
Following
14
Posts
Joined July 18, 2023
Posts
Open post
Replying to
@jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io
@jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io Are there any arguments against using voice models for privacy?
0
1
0
0
Open post
I made my first loop. It's about the biggest form of theft in America
https://loops.video/v/fozO-PC_V3
#philosophy #ethics #law #crime #politics #uspol #USPolitics #socialism #loops
1
0
5
0
Open post
The biggest form of theft in America
https://youtube.com/shorts/5FGyj4rcVE4
Wage theft is estimated to be the biggest form of theft in America. Could this issue be a symptom of deeper systemic issues?
This is a YouTube Short produced for May Day.
⚠️The vocals are flawed. I'm still figuring out how to produce vocals safely.
2
0
3
1
Open post
19
1
15
0
Open post
Replying to
@gimulnautti@mastodon.green
@gimulnautti @aral can you share sources? I’m very interested in studies on how to get people to change major beliefs.
0
0
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@aral@mastodon.ar.al
1
1
1
1
Open post
Replying to
@Legit_Spaghetti@mastodo.neoliber.al
@Legit_Spaghetti@mastodo.neoliber.al
No workplace democracy? Are you not Ellerman-pilled yet?
0
0
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@AnarchoNinaWrites@jorts.horse
RE: https://mastodon.social/@jlou/116427914705053802
@AnarchoNinaWrites the longtermist consequentialism the effective altruism appeals to has been shown to be incoherent through a logical moral paradox called the consequentialist judgment paradox.
0
0
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@Nickiquote@mstdn.social
@Nickiquote@mstdn.social Consequentialist positions cause the “it’s impossible” retort. It’s much harder to retort “it’s impossible” to the people who argue for a better world on rights-based or deontological grounds. Consequentialist arguments appeal to consequences are what allow this. Rights-based arguments appeal to justice and usually have much stronger evidence that the moral criteria they use will be satisfied by the changes they advocate.
2
0
1
0
Open post
Replying to
@Slyence@mastodo.neoliber.al
1
0
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@frrstbrwn@theatl.social
@frrstbrwn@theatl.social @violetmadder@kolektiva.social
A stronger position is to accept the wage labor contract as mutually beneficial, but demonstrate that it violates workers’ inalienable rights, as David Ellerman argues. Inalienable rights are rights that can’t be given up or transferred, even with consent. Ellerman’s work also highlights the stark contrast between what capitalists get and what employees get when property rights and liabilities are considered.
https://youtu.be/c2UCqzH5wAQ
1
1
1
0
Open post
Replying to
@frrstbrwn@theatl.social
@frrstbrwn@theatl.social not just exploited some people being exploited. In terms of property rights, workers get 0% of the positive and negative fruits of their labor. Economists are fully aware of this but try to obfuscate this fact. This violates the whole claimed basis of private property of people getting the fruits of their labor.
1
0
1
0
Remote instance
mastodon.social
Open on original server