#strategy

57 posts · Last used 4d

Back to Timeline
GamingOnLinux @gamingonlinux@mastodon.world · 4d ago
Auto Ball Arena is an upcoming chaotic physics auto battler where you put together pieces and then watch the fireworks during auto battles. https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2026/08/chaotic-physics-auto-battler-auto-ball-arena-looks-like-a-funny-time/ #Steam #IndieGame #Upcoming #Strategy #NativeLinux #Autobattler
0
0
0
Online Marketing Strategy ⌘ @marketing@mastodon.world · Aug 06, 2026
AI referral systems are creating a classic conversion problem - 65% of ChatGPT citations point to deep pages while 58.8% of referral traffic lands on homepages, causing intent-to-landing page mismatches that damage conversions. https://www.searchenginejournal.com/ai-referrals-are-recreating-the-oldest-mistake-in-conversion-optimization/584331/ #Marketing #Strategy #Analytics
0
0
0
Online Marketing Strategy ⌘ @marketing@mastodon.world · Aug 05, 2026
Microsoft Advertising has expanded AI Visibility insights, Performance Max testing and Ad Preview Hub with new reporting and creative review capabilities. The updates give marketers better tools to measure AI-driven ad performance. https://www.searchenginejournal.com/microsoft-advertising-adds-ai-visibility-insights-pmax-testing-and-creative-preview-updates/584760/ #Marketing #Strategy #AI
0
0
0
The Athletic @nyt_sports@robot.villas · Jul 28, 2026
0
0
0
Marius (windsheep) @windsheep@infosec.exchange · Jul 20, 2026
On the one hand I am happy to see open-weight model demand from developers. On the other hand I know that China will not give away free AI, and that this move is strategic. The Chinese have read the Peter Thiel playbook and know how to seize growth opportunities in the tech sector. True open-weight models with an open training pipeline and a future in Europe will have to be from Europe. There is no way out. #ai #china #strategy
0
0
0
Chronogram Magazine @chronogram@robot.villas · Jul 15, 2026
0
0
0
Rock Paper Shotgun @rockpapershotgun@die-partei.social · Jul 14, 2026
1
1
2
Ecologia Digital @josemurilo@mato.social · Jul 10, 2026
Boosted by Tim Chambers @tchambers@indieweb.social
#enshitification "…is not a story about bad people. It is a story about structure. #Platforms mediate two-sided markets, can reallocate value between sides at zero cost, and once both sides are locked in, the platform’s incentives shift from serving either of them to extracting from both. The diverging of platform interests from user interests is not a failure of the platform. It is the #businessmodel. “We just need a better platform” is not a #strategy." https://identitywoman.net/enshittification-arises-from-enclosure-open-protocols-refuse-both/
0
0
3
Trond Hjorteland @trondhjort@hachyderm.io · Apr 30, 2026
Replying to @trondhjort@hachyderm.io
Organisational Dysfunction of the Day OKRs imposed from above Context: Many organisations have adopted OKRs, but a common way of doing them is like a cascade: company OKRs are set by leadership, then broken down into department OKRs, then into team OKRs. Everyone has objectives and key results. The teams go through the quarterly ritual of setting them, reviewing them, and scoring themselves at the end. Some teams engage genuinely, while others may treat it as a compliance exercise. A common complaint is that the team-level OKRs are effectively dictated by the level above, with little to no room to define what matters to them. The framework says teams should own their goals, but the structure says otherwise. OST explains: OKRs are a good idea applied in the wrong structure. In DP2, goal-setting is one of the core functions of the self-managing group; it is not something done to them. When goals are cascaded down from above, even with good intentions, the team is not really setting its own objectives; it is translating management's objectives into local language. That is a DP1 (bureaucratic) function dressed in DP2 clothing. The quarterly scoring ritual then becomes a performance review proxy, which is about the last thing a self-managing team needs. In a genuine DP2 structure, the team's goals emerge from its understanding of its own work, its environment, and the shared organisational purpose it has participated in defining. That is a fundamentally different starting point, and it produces fundamentally different commitment. #OpenSystemsTheory #SocioTechnical #OrgDesign #strategy
2
0
2
Trond Hjorteland @trondhjort@hachyderm.io · May 05, 2026
Replying to @trondhjort@hachyderm.io
Organisational Dysfunction of the Day Built for yesterday Context: The strategy keeps changing. The market shifted, then shifted again. A competitor emerged from an unexpected direction. AI is rewriting the economics of the industry faster than anyone predicted. The three-year plan written eighteen months ago is already obsolete. Leadership responds with more planning, tighter governance, and faster decision cycles at the top. The organisation is working harder than ever and adapting less than ever. People at the coalface can see what needs to change, but cannot get decisions made quickly enough. By the time something is approved, the situation has moved on. The organisation is not slow because people are lazy or misaligned. It is slow because it was designed for a world that no longer exists. OST explains: Emery and Trist identified four types of organisational environment, which they called causal textures. The third, disturbed reactive, is the competitive industrial world that DP1, the bureaucratic structure, was designed for, with large, similar organisations whose moves continually disturb one another. The fourth, turbulent fields, is categorically different: the environment itself is in motion, driven by forces in the field itself, like technological disruption, social change, and ecological pressure. In turbulent fields, the variety generated by the environment exceeds the capacity of any hierarchy to process and respond to it. DP1 is actively maladaptive here, because concentrating perception and decision-making at the top creates exactly the bottleneck that makes the organisation slow when speed matters most. DP2, the self-managing-group structure, distributes that capacity across the whole organisation, with every group actively scanning its environment, adapting, and feeding learning back into the system. We have been in turbulent fields for decades. AI has just turned up the intensity several orders of magnitude. To 11. #OpenSystemsTheory #SocioTechnical #OrgDesign #strategy
3
42
0
Trond Hjorteland @trondhjort@hachyderm.io · May 29, 2026
Replying to @trondhjort@hachyderm.io
Organisational Dysfunction of the Day Outsourcing the future Context: The organisation wants a new strategy. Leadership does not have the bandwidth, or perhaps the confidence, to lead the process internally. A consulting firm is brought in. They are smart, experienced, and methodologically rigorous. They interview the leadership team, benchmark against competitors, analyse market trends, and run workshops with selected stakeholders. A few months later, a strategy document arrives. It is well-structured and credible. The organisation begins implementing it. Some things work. Others do not land the way the consultants predicted. The people doing the implementation have questions that the document does not answer. The consultants are gone. Two years later, a new consulting firm is brought in to develop the next strategy. OST explains: Strategy is not a document. It is a shared understanding of where a system is, where it needs to go, and why. That understanding cannot be imported from outside because it depends on knowledge that only exists inside the system, distributed across the people who operate it, the relationships they hold, and the environment they transact with daily. A consulting firm can bring analytical frameworks, comparative data, and an external perspective. What they cannot do is replace the participative process through which an organisation develops genuine strategic ownership. The Search Conference exists because Emery understood this. An effective strategy requires the whole system in the room, not a representative sample interviewed by outsiders. A strategy people helped build is one they will adapt when reality diverges from the plan. A strategy handed down, however well-researched, will be executed literally until it fails and then replaced by the next one. The cycle is not a strategy problem. It is a participation problem. #OpenSystemsTheory #SocioTechnical #OrgDesign #strategy
12
4
7