#fep

3 posts · Last used 6d

Back to Timeline
In reply to
@smallcircles@social.coop · 6d ago
cc @evan@cosocial.ca relating to earlier #TagsPub discussion we had on the matter. This bot is already combining logic, has multiple 'profle logic' tags. Dunno if "NoBots" is also already common protocol-decaying practice. Maybe a solution might be that an #ActivityPub bot actor - OT: which I'd personally perhaps had chosen to be Application, not Service actors - would have a botFlags property. Simple to implement, and #FEP that. More involved but also much more versatile might be a "Botiquette" as:Profile, or even a bots:Botiquette type, and a namespace to register them at, and where others may find what they mean and how they operate exactly. #NoBots #nobot #fedi22 #NoTagsPub #Botiquette
View full thread on social.coop
4
1
0
@Profpatsch@mastodon.xyz · Apr 10, 2026
Arnold Schrijver (@smallcircles@social.coop) just published a fairly long thinkpiece on the future of ActivityPub and the fediverse and how we could achieve a grassroots improvement of the standards. It's well worth a read! https://coding.social/blog/grassroots-evolution/#fediverse-tomorrow #activitypub #fediverse #FEPs #fep #fedidev
View on mastodon.xyz
0
0
1
@silverpill@mitra.social · Mar 07, 2026
FEP website now displays the number of implementations for each implementable proposal: https://fediverse.codeberg.page/fep/final/ These numbers are based on the information that authors provide in the "Implementations" section of a proposal. By default, proposals are informational, so authors need to opt in by adding type: implementation to the metadata block. #fep #fedidev
View on mitra.social
0
0
0

You've seen all posts