Elektrine
Log in Register
Rake Chat Timeline Gallery Friends Email Soma DNS Private DNS Domains VPN Engram Nerve
Back
Open post
MadeInDex 📰🌎 @madeindex@lemmy.world
· 2mo ago
futurism.com
527
214
0
0
Sign in to interact

Conversation (214)

Showing 151 of 214 cached locally.
63 comments are reported by the remote server but not cached here yet
Open reply Open reply
Th4tGuyII
@Th4tGuyII@fedia.io · Aug 22
In my eyes anyone wearing one of these is a pervert. I simply don't see who else could be the audience for a purposefully discreet camera built into a pair of glasses. Even Google's attempt at glasses were more overt that these. I'd say Meta is shameful, but that's not exactly a shocker to anyone at this point. Edit: Seen a few suggestions, but my counterpoint to all of them is - you don't need the camera to discreet fir any of these purposes. You'd only need it to be discreet if you didn't want people to realise you were filming, which just seems aimed towards perverts in my mind.
118
26
0
Open reply Open reply
riot
@riot@fedia.io · Aug 22
Thread reply
I remember seeing a video of a blind woman using them, in combination with some earbuds, so she could get her surroundings described to her, as well as have objects she picked up described. But you're right, glasses with discreet cameras on them, aren't necessary for a situation like that - Something more overt would be fine for that use case.
29
0
0
Open reply Open reply
jsnfwlr
@jsnfwlr@lemmy.ml · Aug 22
Thread reply
I would love overt google glass style glasses that are obvious as a solution for a dashcam like system for when i am driving, or tracking where I left mg keys etc. But as you say, the discreet camera is for perverts.
15
1
0
Open reply Open reply
CannonFodder
@CannonFodder@lemmy.world · Aug 22
Thread reply
So much potential. Face lookup of contacts so I get reminded of people's names. Lyrics to any detected song so I can sing along. Virtual post-it note reminders in 3D space. Alerts or navigation while walking. Virtual monitors put on any surface. But humans are too hung up on sex, so it's not going to happen.
12
3
0
Open reply Open reply
postmateDumbass
@postmateDumbass@lemmy.world · Aug 22
Thread reply
Humans are often the root of the probem with technology.
5
0
0
Open reply Open reply
petrol_sniff_king
@petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone · Aug 22
Thread reply

Face lookup of contacts so I get reminded of people's names.

Okay, I stop reading here. That's fucking insane.

0
1
0
Open reply Open reply
Aatube
@Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com · Aug 22
Thread reply
what’s wrong with such a fully local application?
5
0
0
Open reply Open reply
einkorn
@einkorn@feddit.org · Aug 22
Thread reply

Even Google's attempt at glasses were more overt that these.

That's because the tech wasn't there yet. Otherwise, it would have been the same.

6
0
0
Open reply Open reply
JensSpahnpasta
@JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org · Aug 22
Thread reply
I kind of like the idea. Take some pictures while doing other things like riding your bike or going on a hike without having to take out your phone. Take a quick picture while shopping to them to my wife. Get navigation cues without the phone. But they are so creepy
3
3
0
Open reply Open reply
frongt
@frongt@lemmy.zip · Aug 22
Thread reply
I've seen videos on Instagram of people using them for a first person view without having to strap a GoPro to their head. Like for hobby work. But if you're going biking or whatever, you can just as easily strap a camera to your helmet, and get a 360° view to boot. If you're hiking or shopping, it's very little effort to take out your phone and snap a pic. And you get the benefit of being able to actually preview the shot.
2
2
0
Open reply Open reply
JensSpahnpasta
@JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org · Aug 23
Thread reply
I really do not want to stick a camera to my helmet. I'm wearing that helmet as safety gear and I do not believe that it is safe to mount robust things with batteries to something which needs to absorb the impact of a fall.
1
1
0
Open reply Open reply
frongt
@frongt@lemmy.zip · Aug 23
Thread reply
It wouldn't be any different from hitting one lying on the ground. The mounts are probably breakaway so that you don't end up with a punctured lithium battery strapped to your head.
0
0
0
Open reply Open reply
brian
@brian@programming.dev · Aug 22
Thread reply
I don’t understand how these are fundamentally different from the phone cameras that everyone points at everyone else already. holding a phone up isn’t exactly conspicuous at this point. schools should probably ban them for the case above, but schools should probably ban phones as well. in the US at least there’s so expectation of privacy anywhere public and smart glasses are a tiny fraction of the doorbell cameras, security cameras, etc that are everywhere it feels like we’re approaching a circlejerk level of being against smart glasses in general, which do have a ton of interesting use cases that aren’t recording related (but still require a camera for position tracking etc). the “pervert glasses” position is intentionally obtuse
2
4
0
Open reply Open reply
Triasha
@Triasha@lemmy.world · Aug 23
Thread reply
Phones and glasses can nudify girls and women in real time. Pervert glasses is not an exaggeration.
1
3
0
Open reply Open reply
jumping redditor [they/them]
@jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works · Aug 23
Thread reply
phone cameras can already do that, and the concealment was doable with a raspberry pi zero and its camera
-1
0
0
Open reply Open reply
brian
@brian@programming.dev · Aug 24
Thread reply
i bet ur typing this on a pervert phone right now. i hear ur pervert computer does the same thing but faster. we should ban computers. this is not an exaggeration.
-1
1
0
Open reply Open reply
Triasha
@Triasha@lemmy.world · Aug 24
Thread reply
Glad we are in agreement.
0
0
0
Open reply Open reply
Hanrahan
@hanrahan@slrpnk.net · Aug 23
Thread reply
>In my eyes anyone wearing one of these is a pervert fucking blind perverts /s https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/apr/07/the-life-changing-magic-of-wearing-smartglasses >As the chief executive of a charity supporting people with a visual impairment, however, I would like to emphasise the point touched upon in your article: how transformative this technology is already proving for blind people.
The life-changing magic of wearing smartglasses | Letters
The life-changing magic of wearing smartglasses | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to Elle Hunt’s review of Meta smartglasses, pointing out that the technology has a lot to offer to people with visual impairments or hearing loss
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/apr/07/the-life-changing-magic-of-wearing-smartglasses
-1
0
0
Open reply Open reply
∟⊔⊤∦∣≶
@luthis@lemmy.nz · Aug 22
Hoooold up just a minute. How much do these glasses cost? Like hundreds right? What kind of teen boy has that much money to burn? I sure as fuck didn't, and I worked. Their parents bought them, and these are kids, so it's 100% blame on the parents here.
84
16
0
Open reply Open reply
anon_8675309
@anon_8675309@lemmy.world · Aug 22
Thread reply
Even if the kids bought them it is still the parent’s responsibility to keep their kid from being an obnoxious pervert.
57
2
0
Open reply Open reply
FlashMobOfOne
@FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world · Aug 22
Thread reply
That's what really sucks about this. There's no institutional backlash. (At least not yet. That could change.) We're depending on parents who park these little shits in front of screens and expect to be left alone while their kids are radicalized.
16
1
0
Open reply Open reply
0xDREADBEEF
@dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com · Aug 22
Thread reply
The alternative is having the rich parents be responsible for the children they breed and that will never happen so suck it up poors
7
0
0
Open reply Open reply
Geologist
@Geologist@lemmy.zip · Aug 22
Thread reply
I had thousands as a teenager from around 15 years old working part time evening and weekends at barely above minimum wage. When you have no expenses from living at home, you can save everything (and in my case blow it all on electronics lol)
16
7
0
Open reply Open reply
ripcord
@ripcord@lemmy.world · Aug 22
Thread reply
Ok, middle school then
4
6
0
Open reply Open reply
village604
@village604@adultswim.fan · Aug 22
Thread reply
Parents with more money than sense
9
5
0
Open reply Open reply
jumping redditor [they/them]
@jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works · Aug 23
Thread reply
It's not much different than a kid asking for a playstation or iphone for Christmas
-1
4
0
Open reply Open reply
Bluescluestoothpaste
@Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works · Aug 23
Thread reply
It is because you dont use your playstation to harass girls at school
2
3
0
Open reply Open reply
jumping redditor [they/them]
@jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works · Aug 23
Thread reply
they can already use their phone for that
-2
2
0
Open reply Open reply
Bluescluestoothpaste
@Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works · Aug 25
Thread reply
Those are also banned in class, or they should be, every school has different policies of course.
1
1
0
Open reply Open reply
jumping redditor [they/them]
@jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works · Aug 25
Thread reply
they mostly aren't banned yet
-1
0
0
Open reply Open reply
MoogleMaestro
@MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip · Aug 22
Thread reply
Rich kids. The worst type as they're also the least likely to get meaningfully punished.
12
0
0
Open reply Open reply
Gerudo
@Gerudo@lemmy.zip · Aug 22
Thread reply
When I was 16 and started working, I quickly had enough money saved from working minimum wage, part time, to buy myself a car. It's not impossible. Also, these may be kids/young adults, but they should all know right from wrong. Blame is absolutely on the students who use these too.
9
0
0
Open reply Open reply
magnue
@magnue@lemmy.world · Aug 22
Thread reply
No different to mobile phones or iPods or PlayStations. Pair of meta raybans are arguably cheaper than those items now due to inflation.
4
1
0
Open reply Open reply
∟⊔⊤∦∣≶
@luthis@lemmy.nz · Aug 22
Thread reply
These devices are fundamentally different to those.
2
0
0
Open reply Open reply
Malyca
@Malyca@lemmy.zip · Aug 22
I guarantee most of these schools protect the bullies and punish the victims. Like if a girl being harassed broke the glasses, she would get expelled. The world is the way it is because people enable and worship bullies across the board.
62
10
0
Open reply Open reply
innermachine
@innermachine@lemmy.world · Aug 22
Thread reply
This. My friend in HS went to guidance multiple times to complain about being bullied by another classmate. After the 2nd or 3rd time requesting thy switch his class, they decided to resolve the issue by forcing them to be partners for an assignment in class. He complained again, and was told to deal with it. One day my friend finally cracked and broke the bully's nose because he had enough and clearly the school was only willing to make this worse, so they called the police on my friend. It's pretty insane how some things get dealt with sometimes.
42
2
0
Open reply Open reply
Malyca
@Malyca@lemmy.zip · Aug 22
Thread reply
Countless stories like this :(
8
0
0
Open reply Open reply
HerbGrower
@HerbGrower@slrpnk.net · Aug 22
Thread reply
I wish they called the police when I stood up for myself. It was sexual harassment/assault but I didn't know that at the time, I just knew I didn't like it so used violence. He stopped and ran off bleeding all over the place. Totally valid self defence from a legal perspective. But they only used the threat of calling the police and I was absolutely terrified so just shut down.
7
0
0
Open reply Open reply
HerbGrower
@HerbGrower@slrpnk.net · Aug 22
Thread reply
Schools don't care about bullying or sexual harassment as long as it doesn't look bad on them. If it can be swept under the rug, they will ignore it. At least that is my experience from schools in the UK.
25
4
0
Open reply Open reply
Malyca
@Malyca@lemmy.zip · Aug 22
Thread reply
Same in the US
16
0
0
Open reply Open reply
JasonDJ
@JasonDJ@lemmy.zip · Aug 23
Thread reply
For parents in America, we have an escalation path: school board, media, lawyer. Depending on the situation, the orders may change.
4
2
0
Open reply Open reply
HerbGrower
@HerbGrower@slrpnk.net · Aug 23
Thread reply
When the school make you feel like you are the one who did something wrong you are not going to tell your parents about it.
2
1
0
Open reply Open reply
jumping redditor [they/them]
@jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works · Aug 23
Thread reply
this is why advocacy groups are important
0
0
0
Open reply Open reply
arararagi
@arararagi@ani.social · Aug 22
Thread reply
>In a different video, the same boy films another upset girl approaching him with a metal stool in her hands. An adult intervenes before anyone is hurt. Exactly, they always protect the bullies.
22
1
0
Open reply Open reply
JasonDJ
@JasonDJ@lemmy.zip · Aug 23
Thread reply
Humans suck at looking at things on a long timeline. "Sticks and stones". You don't usually see the effects of years of bullying until adulthood. Or at least not immediately. A TBI, that'll get you fucking sued. Emotional trauma? What's that? Fuck they still try to blame school shootings on videogames and now tiktok.
5
0
0
Open reply Open reply
TIEPilot
@TIEPilot@lemmy.world · Aug 22
I am Jack's complete lack of surprise. Couple this w/ the AI nudification sites and this is gonna be insane. Teen boys don't think big picture...
47
6
0
Open reply Open reply
arin
@arin@lemmy.world · Aug 22
Stop blaming the kids, it’s the corporation’s fault. Title should be Meta glasses are recording and enabling harassment of underaged school children
45
6
0
Open reply Open reply
JensSpahnpasta
@JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org · Aug 22
Thread reply
Yeah. The kids are just the last part of the chain of failure here. Why is Meta producing such a thing? Why the fuck are parents buying several hundred dollars worth of spy glasses for their children and sending them to school with them without any supervision? And what the fuck is the school doing here? The first report of someone harassing other pupils with such a device should be reason to ban them and take hard discipline measures against the harrasser
27
0
0
Open reply Open reply
mrnngglry
@mrnngglry@sh.itjust.works · Aug 22
Thread reply
The glasses shouldn’t exist but what parents are buying these for their kids?! Blame the parents too.
12
0
0
Open reply Open reply
BradleyUffner
@BradleyUffner@lemmy.world · Aug 22
Thread reply
These kids absolutely know it's wrong. Stop enabling bullies. The kids should NOT get a pass for this just because some corporation did something wrong first.
10
0
0
Open reply Open reply
best_redditor
@best_redditor@leminal.space · Aug 22
Thread reply
supplier first then the chain...everyone is blamed
5
0
0
Open reply Open reply
pageflight
@pageflight@piefed.social · Aug 22
Thread reply
And a lot of enabling parents.
4
0
0
Open reply Open reply
FlashMobOfOne
@FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world · Aug 22
Thread reply
10000000%
0
0
0
Open reply Open reply
brsrklf
@brsrklf@jlai.lu · Aug 22
And probably *even more* ads sent directly to your eyeballs. If they're not there yet they're already on the roadmap.
37
3
0
Open reply Open reply
willington
@willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com · Aug 22
Thread reply
What matters is who controls the tech, not just the capabilities.
16
2
0
Open reply Open reply
cloudshouter
@cloudshouter@lemmy.zip · Aug 23
From the opening part of the article, the problem is not just the glasses. The glasses are definitely an issue that needs to be sorted out society wide, but there is a problem with how these boys are raised. Badly raised boys have always been an issue but now they are being raised by manosphere incel influencers. The glasses just let them record their harassment to post for clout and to draw others into their bullying.
36
0
0
Open reply Open reply
RememberTheApollo_
@RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world · Aug 23
Yeah who the hell is buying creeper glasses for kids to wear at schools. This is messed up.
33
0
0
Open reply Open reply
jabjoe
@jabjoe@feddit.uk · Aug 23
By there not being enough consequences for these boys, not only are you making more boys like this, but not doing those boys any favours either. No one mentally healthy is going to want to be with that kind of boy. Weak parents. Weak schools. Weak government. Failing everyone.
29
0
0
Open reply Open reply
Monument
@Monument@piefed.world · Aug 22
People are being disgusting, using technology that was designed to be stealthy on purpose by others for disgusting reasons (to normalize allowing ever greater data collection by tech companies - no surprise the privacy protections are trivially easy to defeat), and are posting videos online for a reason - that they get satisfaction from it. I guess I don’t care if this makes me sound old or callous, but we need to bully these people. Make the people who post and share these videos embarrassed. Tell them they look like stupid losers who can’t get dates or talk to people. Make them feel bad for not being kind and socially connecting with others. Give them no community or understanding until they stop breaking the social contract.
28
8
0
Open reply Open reply
chunes
@chunes@lemmy.world · Aug 22
Thread reply
What social contract? The kids wearing these can't value something they've never known.
9
0
0
Open reply Open reply
mojofrododojo
@mojofrododojo@lemmy.world · Aug 22
Thread reply
the only 3 usecases for these are: Assholes Perverts Blind people - sucks for them, because the first two are going to ruin it before it benefits anyone with disabilities
4
6
0
Open reply Open reply
nednobbins
@nednobbins@lemmy.zip · Aug 22
Can someone explain why this isn't actually a solution to an old problem? We used to have issues with various forms of harassment that were not addressed because they relied on unreliable testimony. Now we actually have people creating hard evidence of their actions. The behaviors described in this article are banned in every school I or my children have ever attended. How difficult would it be for the parents of any of these victims to hire a lawyer to absolutely wipe the floor with these people? Don't these videos basically put the perpetrators heads on silver platters?
27
4
0
Open reply Open reply
Dingo_Kidneys
@Dingo_Kidneys@lemmy.today · Aug 23
Thread reply
Crime usually comes before punishment. Right now the system is working it's way into figuring out how to deal with this new social dynamic. Like you, I think it's pretty straightforward. We won't solve the core reason for the bullying dynamics though. I think humans that adhere to gendered thinking will be behind on that for a good long while yet.
12
1
0
Open reply Open reply
nednobbins
@nednobbins@lemmy.zip · Aug 23
Thread reply
It would be pretty messed up if the punishment came before the crime. My point, in this case is that the crime has been ongoing. Bullying and harassment aren't new. What's new is that we now have a lot of it recorded. This gives us an unprecedented ability to prosecute a class of crimes that people have been committing with impunity. The biggest downside is that it would likely be short-lived. If there were a bunch of headlines about people getting giant civil judgements, bullies would probably learn to be more careful about generating evidence of their crimes. That would likely initially focus on attempting to hide the videos from the general public but I suspect they would eventually learn that doesn't work; courts can compel discovery. They would probably also try to modify their on-screen behavior so it doesn't technically qualify as a crime but I expect they would mostly fail at that. That said there would likely always be some cohort of dumb criminals who continue to record their misdeeds. We still see cases where people discuss their crimes over unencrypted email and we still see cases of criminals taking selfies with their crimes
3
0
0
Open reply Open reply
Echolynx
@Echolynx@lemmy.zip · Aug 23
Thread reply
You assume that action will actually be taken on the perpetrators here.
3
1
0
Open reply Open reply
nednobbins
@nednobbins@lemmy.zip · Aug 23
Thread reply
Sort of. I am making an assumption that there are some people who are likely highly motivated to take action. Parents often care about bullying of their own children, even when the rest of the school doesn't. We wouldn't need all parents to care, just a few of them. I'm not assuming that lawyers are generally willing to work for free but I do assume that they like money and are willing to take cases on contingency, if they think the case is strong enough. I'm also going on my understanding that video evidence tends to be fairly strong and that this translates into a higher probability of a favorable judgement with less work on the lawyer's part. So it's less that I'm making an assumption than that I'm asking where the gap in the above reasoning chain lies.
1
0
0
Open reply Open reply
olenkoVD
@olenkoVD@lemmy.dbzer0.com · Aug 22
Here they're not even allowing students to carry mobile phones inside of schools. How is this even allowed?
19
1
0
Open reply Open reply
wittymyusername
@wittymyusername@lemmy.zip · Aug 22
Thread reply
>Here they're not even allowing students to carry Thought for sure you were setting up an “Americans Love Guns” joke.
1
0
0
Open reply Open reply
Professorozone
@Professorozone@lemmy.world · Aug 23
It's ok, their parents will take care of the situation.
14
1
0
Open reply Open reply
heartSagan5
@heartSagan5@lemmy.zip · Aug 23
Thread reply
Ah-hahaha, what a joke.
7
0
0
Open reply Open reply
Echolynx
@Echolynx@lemmy.zip · Aug 23
Why is the minimum age not 18?
13
9
0
Open reply Open reply
UltraBlack
@UltraBlack@lemmy.world · Aug 23
Thread reply
Creeps exist above 18 years old too...
11
1
0
Open reply Open reply
Echolynx
@Echolynx@lemmy.zip · Aug 23
Thread reply
Yes but starting with an age limitation is a start on these damn things.
11
0
0
Open reply Open reply
jumping redditor [they/them]
@jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works · Aug 23
Thread reply
in what world is age restricting a relatively normal camera a reasonable decision?
-12
6
0
Open reply Open reply
youmaynotknow
@jjlinux@lemmy.zip · Aug 23
Thread reply
How the fuck is this a "relatively normal" camera, or ANY kind of "normal"? People like you are the reason these companies get away with shit like this.
7
1
0
Open reply Open reply
jumping redditor [they/them]
@jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works · Aug 23
Thread reply
because there isn't anything particularly special about it other thsn it being a mass market product
-6
0
0
Open reply Open reply
Echolynx
@Echolynx@lemmy.zip · Aug 23
Thread reply
When it breaks laws. My area has two-party consent laws, so recording someone, whether audio or video, without their explicit consent is against the law. Children are often not held to the fullest extent of the law, and if they cannot be held responsible, then they shouldn't have access to such devices until they can be. I'm not naive to think that these devices will just go away or that the genie can go back into the bottle. But that is where regulation must act to protect people's privacy rights.
7
2
0
Open reply Open reply
jumping redditor [they/them]
@jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works · Aug 24
Thread reply
what ia the difference between this and a phone taped inside of a shirt?
-6
1
0
Open reply Open reply
mojofrododojo
@mojofrododojo@lemmy.world · Aug 24
Thread reply
perhaps it's time to jump back to reddit. they'll tolerate your feigned stupidity over there.
0
0
0
Open reply Open reply
mojofrododojo
@mojofrododojo@lemmy.world · Aug 24
Thread reply
creep detected
2
0
0
Open reply Open reply
HerbGrower
@HerbGrower@slrpnk.net · Aug 22
Yeah no shit letting people go around with concealed recording equipment is resulting in problems. Especially in a fucking school!
12
2
0
Open reply Open reply
DreamlandLividity
@DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world · Aug 23
Thread reply
So the same bullying that always happens is now visible and that's the core problem people see. The glasses, not the bullies wearing them or the bullying recorded. Watch teachers and schools fight the recording, that make evidence fall right into their laps, so they can go back to ignoring bullying in their schools and then act shocked when serious fights, or worse happen.
10
1
0
Open reply Open reply
HerbGrower
@HerbGrower@slrpnk.net · Aug 23
Thread reply
Actually a good point, the bullying and sexual harassment was always there with or without the glasses. The glasses give them a new option for harassment, but it happens either way.
5
0
0
Open reply Open reply
GreenKnight23
@GreenKnight23@lemmy.world · Aug 22
these boys need their mother's to whoop their asses and their dads to whip them into shape. "oh boys will be boys" no. boys will be whatever you let them be, and if you let them be perverted pieces of shit they grow up to be perverted pieces of shit.
12
4
0
Open reply Open reply
Wataba
@Wataba@sh.itjust.works · Aug 23
Thread reply
And if you physically abuse them, theyll become physically abusive. Grow up.
-1
1
0
Open reply Open reply
GreenKnight23
@GreenKnight23@lemmy.world · Aug 23
Thread reply
more ways than one for an ass whoopin. ever bailed hay in 100° heat? ever cleaned a septic tank out? ever sorted recyclables at the garbage dump? I would gladly take an ass beating over any of those. grow up, there's punishments worse than getting beat.
-3
0
0
Open reply Open reply
FordBeeblebrox
@FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world · Aug 23
Sit them in a dunce corner full of mirrors until the battery runs out.
8
0
0
Open reply Open reply
TrackinDaKraken
@DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world · Aug 22
Not just nude, but any race, any age, any species. Or, make some or all people disappear from view. Not just people but everything around you will look however you want it to (or can afford to pay someone else to make it so.) Clothes will become simple, disposable leotards with markings that make it easy for AR to overlay any style of "clothes". We'll broadcast our selection to the surrounding goggles, and they can either show that, or whatever they want. Of course sound is part of it too, so your Puerto Rican "friend" can look like and sound like Princess Diana to you. But wait, there's more. Let's say you're walking down a busy street and your boss is out that day too. He'll be able to spot you from blocks away, and even through buildings, tracking your location and following you until he "happens to bump into you." A feature reserved for certain "elites" and "officials" in society. Whatever information you have available about the people around you will appear floating around them, like a health bar. You think we have no privacy now, wait till everyone knows the basics about you and can pay to know even more, and have it appear above your head and whispered in their ear.
7
0
0
Open reply Open reply
funkajunk 🇨🇦
@funkajunk@lemmy.world · Aug 22
These are children we're talking about, they lack the ability for critical thinking.
7
4
0
Open reply Open reply
frustrated_phagocytosis
@frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io · Aug 22
Thread reply
And yet if one gets pregnant, parenthood is forced upon them
1
0
0
Open reply Open reply
Gerudo
@Gerudo@lemmy.zip · Aug 22
Thread reply
Don't forget, high schools have students who are legal adults.
1
1
0
Open reply Open reply
SPRUNTnsfw
@SPRUNTnsfw@fedinsfw.app · Aug 22
Thread reply
Many adults lack the ability for critical thinking.
6
0
0
Open reply Open reply
fartographer
@fartographer@lemmy.world · Aug 23

Maybe we can get our hands on some of those Volvo lidar modules to combat all these cameras around us? "Your assumed right to record me doesn't overrule my right to make high resolution 3D scans of everywhere I go."

Volvo EX90's Lidar Module Fries Smartphone Camera in Viral Video
Volvo EX90's Lidar Module Fries Smartphone Camera in Viral Video
A startling video shows a Volvo EX90's lidar system zapping a smartphone's telephoto camera, revealing a little-known risk of next-gen automotive tech.
https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a64781017/ex90-lidar-iphone-16-pro-max-sensor/
5
1
0
Open reply Open reply
Justifier
@Justifier@lemmy.world · Aug 24
Thread reply
Are the glasses lens telephoto? Those are the only ones the article says get damaged by the lidar
2
0
0
Open reply Open reply
m3t00🌎🇺🇦
@m3t00@lemmy.world · Aug 23

just grab a pair of cheap Clark Kents. girls will avoid you.

use a james bond pen if you only want pictures.

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/6f7ee009-d414-4259-bfa8-7ca0be5f173e.png
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/6f7ee009-d414-4259-bfa8-7ca0be5f173e.png
5
0
0
Open reply Open reply
mojofrododojo
@mojofrododojo@lemmy.world · Aug 22
so I've given that one some thought and came away with this: if ice / pd detains you, they're going to take your recording devices. I need my glasses to see enough to walk around. also, even more gross: they know what to look for, because until recently, ICE was using these devices. That's been banned, but probably only because they're making their own. https://www.yahoo.com/news/us/articles/ice-banned-meta-glasses-now-154840012.html
ICE Banned Meta Glasses at Work – Now It’s Building Something Far More Powerful
ICE Banned Meta Glasses at Work – Now It’s Building Something Far More Powerful
ICE banned Meta Ray-Ban glasses but is spending $7.5M on agency-built smart glasses with real-time facial recognition tied to 75 million biometric records.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/us/articles/ice-banned-meta-glasses-now-154840012.html
5
3
0
Open reply Open reply
jumping redditor [they/them]
@jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works · Aug 23
Thread reply
these might not have cell plans, but it wouldn't be hard to make one with esim support and a panic livestream button so they can't delete the recording.
0
1
0
Open reply Open reply
mojofrododojo
@mojofrododojo@lemmy.world · Aug 23
Thread reply
perhaps? actually sounds like a project aaaand a privacy nightmare, unfettering these devices from whatever protections for the public meta engages in.... I'm all about surveilling ICE and law enforcement but... I don't see these devices as an alternative at the end of the day.
2
0
0
Open reply Open reply
HerbGrower
@HerbGrower@slrpnk.net · Aug 22
Guerilla warfare glasses. Highlights property owned by billionaires.
5
0
0
Open reply Open reply
gwl [he/him]
@gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone · Aug 23
What teen boys can even fucking afford those? They're like £500 for a stupid pair of glasses
4
1
0
Open reply Open reply
bilgamesch
@bilgamesch@feddit.org · Aug 23
Thread reply
I'm a teacher. I don't know how they pull this of - but even kids from poorer families tend to carry some very expensive gadgets around all day. Stuff I wouldn't afford with my 4k salary because it would be completely unreasonable. They do.
2
0
0
Open reply Open reply
Smoogs
@Smoogs@lemmy.world · Aug 22
so if perverts are not allowed on school property and it is considered private space for that reason... so who is enforcing that law? the fuck happened to this society? everyone just seems to be victims all the time. no doers.
4
0
0
Open reply Open reply
frustrated_phagocytosis
@frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io · Aug 22
Seems like something title 9 should be used to quash, but civil rights for women are only important if transgender people exist in public somewhere
3
0
0
Open reply Open reply
FlashMobOfOne
@FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world · Aug 22
Is there any actual data to support the claim you're making, or are you taking a few viral videos and using them as a means to support your own implicit bias?
3
5
0
Open reply Open reply
GreenKnight23
@GreenKnight23@lemmy.world · Aug 23
who is the victim in this story? is it the girls targeted by boys recording them against their will and doing unsavory things with the footage? or is it the boys recording the girls against the will, getting caught, and getting their priorities set straight?
2
1
0
Open reply Open reply
BlakeFox808
@BlakeFox808@lemmy.world · Aug 22
The girls need to fight back with photos of them. Watch how fast they put a stop to it.
2
1
0
Open reply Open reply
HerbGrower
@HerbGrower@slrpnk.net · Aug 22
Thread reply
Make them famous.
1
0
0
Open reply Open reply
Echo Dot
@echodot@feddit.uk · Aug 22
I feel like everyone is talking about these glasses and I've never seen anyone wearing them. Not saying it's not happening but I think it's a US thing Is it just a power of glasses with plastic lenses and a camera or do they actually have any other features, because if it's just a camera then they're really isn't any legitimate market.
2
1
0
Open reply Open reply
frongt
@frongt@lemmy.zip · Aug 22
Thread reply
They aren't actually all that common, especially outside the US, but you probably also wouldn't notice them: https://www.goodhousekeeping.com/travel-products/a69461056/ray-ban-meta-glasses-review/ https://www.techradar.com/computing/virtual-reality-augmented-reality/ray-ban-meta-smart-glasses-collection-review They just look like glasses if you're not looking closely. You have to specifically look for the camera or the big arms.
These Smart Glasses Made Me Put My Phone Down on Vacation—Now I’ll Never Travel Without Them
These Smart Glasses Made Me Put My Phone Down on Vacation—Now I’ll Never Travel Without Them
I didn't expect to love AI glasses, but they've changed how I capture memories while traveling.
https://www.goodhousekeeping.com/travel-products/a69461056/ray-ban-meta-glasses-review/
3
0
0
Open reply Open reply
kalkulat
@kalkulat@lemmy.world · Aug 23
Good for the girls, they'll know which boys to stay away from!
1
0
0
Open reply Open reply
heartSagan5
@heartSagan5@lemmy.zip · Aug 23
Did we not learn from those X-ray goggle ads in the 50s? Boys are pervs and any toy that achieves it will get whatever adolescent/pre-adolescent boys can summon. Actually, Zuck learned to exploit this craving. Sick fuck.
1
0
0
Open reply Open reply
NauticalNoodle
@NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml · Aug 22
this is going to be a bad ADA issue
0
0
0
Open reply Open reply
GreenKnight23
@GreenKnight23@lemmy.world · Aug 22

1000004502

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/d15ecdd0-e603-415b-a093-a143b73d6cc7.jpeg
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/d15ecdd0-e603-415b-a093-a143b73d6cc7.jpeg
0
0
0
Open reply Open reply
minorkeys
@minorkeys@sh.itjust.works · Aug 22
I love how the only meaningful outrage over these are the impact to women. Everyone else is basically worthless to our cultural value system.
0
20
0
Open reply Open reply
zbyte64
@zbyte64@awful.systems · Aug 22
Thread reply
I mean, why do you think they are targeting women in the first place?
8
16
0
Open reply Open reply
minorkeys
@minorkeys@sh.itjust.works · Aug 23
Thread reply
Other people are targetted as well, but we don’t hear about them because the culture doesn’t care. Women affected by something that changed so society needs to protect the helpless women, yet again.
0
16
0
Open reply Open reply
zbyte64
@zbyte64@awful.systems · Aug 23
Thread reply
Would you say women and men are targeted in equal proportions or that one group is targeted over the other based on “perceived value”? Like I am not saying you are wrong, I am just saying, “yes, and”
4
9
0
Open reply Open reply
minorkeys
@minorkeys@sh.itjust.works · Aug 23
Thread reply
I would say all victims deserve a voice but we only seem to care about one.
0
9
0
Open reply Open reply
zbyte64
@zbyte64@awful.systems · Aug 23
Thread reply
That’s the nature of patriarchy. Women are to be protected while most men are disposable.
3
6
0
Open reply Open reply
minorkeys
@minorkeys@sh.itjust.works · Aug 23
Thread reply
It isn’t patriarchy, it’s women protecting each other. Its matriarchy in a patriarchal trenchcoat.
1
5
0
Open reply Open reply
zbyte64
@zbyte64@awful.systems · Aug 24
Thread reply
That’s a non-sequitur. A group of people banding together to protect themselves is not automarically an *archy. Nor does it follow they are secretly in control. I think you are describing your own personal reality then the reality at large. Do women really control your life so much that you feel you are not in control of your own life? Can you cite an example for us to analyze?
0
4
0
Open reply Open reply
minorkeys
@minorkeys@sh.itjust.works · Aug 24
Thread reply
Trying to make it personal doesn’t improve your argument.
1
3
0
Open reply Open reply
zbyte64
@zbyte64@awful.systems · Aug 24
Thread reply
If you want to argue then address the first two sentences rebutting your argument. If you want to express your feelings you address the personal. I gave you both options and you chose the latter. Consider me your free schizo therapist.
1
2
0
Open reply Open reply
PetterOfCats
@PetterOfCats@mastodon.world · Aug 24
Thread reply

@minorkeys@sh.itjust.works
all victims would include women who are raising their voices against this. Still waiting on the “other” victims you are inferring. So rather than very much standing against “some” of the victims as you are very openly and plainly doing, perhaps lend your voice to help rather than harm.

1
0
0
Open reply Open reply
GreenKnight23
@GreenKnight23@lemmy.world · Aug 23
Thread reply

is that incel I smell?

nah

1000004506

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/6c594411-26fb-4512-9311-668748cc66be.jpeg
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/6c594411-26fb-4512-9311-668748cc66be.jpeg
0
3
0
Open reply Open reply
Komatoes
@Komatoes@discuss.online · Aug 23
Thread reply
Women, the most historically and universally oppressed group in humanity?
2
0
0
Open reply Open reply
jumping redditor [they/them]
@jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works · Aug 23
recording teachers should be another valid use, you would bot believe the number of times teachers don't do their legally mandated reporting and brush everything under the rug
-1
0
0
Open reply Open reply
whereitsat
@whereitsat@lemmy.zip · Aug 22
this article is stupid for another reason: go on youtube and look up camcorder footage of public high schools in the 90s. absolutely NOBODY is anxious about getting filmed, and nobody has bad intentions, and nobody would write an article about it. maybe things ARE worse but maybe the situation is more complex than meta glasses.
-6
5
0
Open reply Open reply
HertzDentalBar
@HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone · Aug 22
Thread reply
In the 90s we didn't have kids recording things for clout and follows. Kids with camcorders were the alt or nerd crowd doing it for themselves or at most local cable access.
16
2
0
Open reply Open reply
HerbGrower
@HerbGrower@slrpnk.net · Aug 22
Thread reply
Plus a camcorder isn't really a covert recording device.
8
1
0
Open reply Open reply
HertzDentalBar
@HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone · Aug 22
Thread reply

https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/pictrs/image/4dced9cd-cdbe-435d-b082-accd2f365be7.webp
https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/pictrs/image/4dced9cd-cdbe-435d-b082-accd2f365be7.webp
4
0
0
Open reply Open reply
Bilb!
@bilb@lemmy.ml · Aug 22
Thread reply
In the 90s, camcorders were a relative novelty and nobody had any reason to be anxious about being filmed because there was no way to easily share video with millions of strange people maliciously for clout. If you were caught doing something funny, you might appear on TV after signing a release. (e.g. America's Funniest Home Videos) Sharing video on the internet was a practical technical impossibility, and people had mostly private lives. You're right it's not really the glasses, it's the internet and social media. I wouldn't be surprised if the first person POV provided by glasses makes content like that more compelling, though, and thus more common. People covertly filmed for malicious reasons even back then of course, but it was not generally made available to the masses. If I have a point, it's that I don't think this is evidence that we're more fucked up now than we were then, just that technology has enabled new kinds of abuse that were inconceivable back then.
12
0
0
Open reply Open reply
douglasg14b
@douglasg14b@lemmy.world · Aug 22
Thread reply
Yeah, our society is fucked, that's what
4
0
0
Open reply Open reply
FlashMobOfOne
@FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world · Aug 22
Data. Stats. Compilation of actual, verified reports. But, your response does answer my question, and you should know it's not 2014 anymore. No matter how fashionable your algorithm has made you think that it is to smear men as a whole, the rest of the world has seen how ridiculous it is. If you think you get to lump me or your male friends in with these people without being asked to prove it, you should maybe have enough respect for the men in your life that you esteem to actually hunt down some evidence before posting things like this. Have a great day.
-10
3
0
Open reply Open reply
athatet
@athatet@lemmy.zip · Aug 22
Thread reply
This is the most insane ‘not all men’ take I have ever seen.
11
2
0
Open reply Open reply
FlashMobOfOne
@FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world · Aug 22
Thread reply
Asking for proof? Should be a very easy thing to provide given how confident you are that, apparently, this is an epidemic among men. Far be it from all of us to pretend we're guilty just because you presume we are. I'm sorry, but you're being very unreasonable. I hope one day the men in your orbit stop quietly accepting that you say things like this.
-7
1
0
Open reply Open reply
athatet
@athatet@lemmy.zip · Aug 22
Thread reply
Nowhere did anyone say ‘all men are doing this’ the OP just changed it from ‘teen boys’ to ‘men of all ages’ Fucking chill.
9
0
0
Open reply Open reply
Surp
@Surp@lemmy.world · Aug 22
I think young men don't know how to flirt anymore. I think many of them think they are flirting in some weird way but they have no clue that they are actually bothering/pestering/harassing these woman. I mean I know too many young men that don't have licences, don't know how to use a lawn mower, can't ride a bike, completely useless men...just can't do anything besides go to school play video games and not much else. I do blame technology. Keep your kids off online gaming imo. Bust out the old games or only let them play offline games on a console or PC. Especially no cell phone games. Cut YouTube to practically nothing. Get them outside...
-10
7
0
Open reply Open reply
late_pessimistic
@late_pessimistic@slrpnk.net · Aug 22
Thread reply
This has nothing to do with flirting. They harass girls to feel in control and take out their dating frustration on someone else
6
1
0
Open reply Open reply
Surp
@Surp@lemmy.world · Aug 23
Thread reply
I was just trying to guess that they think they are flirting but they are so far gone they have no idea they are harassing just a theory. They still are in the wrong not downplaying it
4
0
0
Open reply Open reply
thefloweracidic
@thefloweracidic@lemmy.world · Aug 22
Thread reply
I think about the issues with modern dating often, flirting included. One of my perspectives is dating culture is an extension of social culture which is an extension of communal culture, and unfortunately communal culture is dying in America. From something as common as college kids getting educated out of state then starting their career at a 3rd location, to something more systemic like the formation of the rust belt, local communities have been eroding. Without an established generational history of people talking, connecting, enjoying each other, flirting, and dating no one can really know the difference between expressing interest and harassment as that difference now depends on what your algorithm says and what your echo chambers reinforce. In short everyone is playing by a different set of social rules, video games may play a part in this via social isolation, but I think the greater socioeconomic system we're all bound to is much more culpable.
5
2
0
Open reply Open reply
UltraGiGaGigantic
@UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml · Aug 22
Thread reply
My landlords raise my rent every year, forcing me to move every year. Why would I bother to foster a sense of community when the community will throw me out at the nearest convenience for profit?
8
1
0
Open reply Open reply
thefloweracidic
@thefloweracidic@lemmy.world · Aug 22
Thread reply
Exactly, the system we live in undermines communities, this is just another example.
9
0
0
Open reply Open reply
SlimePirate
@SlimePirate@lemmy.dbzer0.com · Aug 23
Thread reply
Not having a license or not knowing how to use a lawn mower is being useless these days
0
1
0
Open reply Open reply
Surp
@Surp@lemmy.world · Aug 23
Thread reply
My point being is they don't know how to do normal everyday things, I can't write out the thousand normal everyday things in one post...nor would I. Chores are something that are proven to help children aged 10-17, from first-hand experience where I live and interacting with hundreds of kids from different backgrounds, seem to somehow have next to no responsibilities. Obviously going to be different circumstances wherever you live. https://www.aacap.org/AACAP/Families_and_Youth/Facts_for_Families/FFF-Guide/Chores_and_Children-125.aspx https://www.uvws.org/news/s94a63z7yun3fczjm80xh8fzivafkb https://evidencebasedliving.human.cornell.edu/blog/research-confirms-that-chores-are-good-for-kids/
Chores and Children
Chores are routine but necessary tasks, such as washing the dishes or folding laundry.
https://www.aacap.org/AACAP/Families_and_Youth/Facts_for_Families/FFF-Guide/Chores_and_Children-125.aspx
2
0
0
Open reply Open reply
whereitsat
@whereitsat@lemmy.zip · Aug 22
can journalism please stop digging deep into the cambridge to pull out words like 'wheedles?' i've been on this earth for almost 50 years, and i've read thousands of texts and never seen that word fucking ever. you should NOT have to look in the dictionary to read pop culture drivel. these dipshits are just trying to justify their privileged educations, and the ironic thing is that none of them can write for shit despite needing a private school/ivy league pedigree to churn out vacuous thinkpieces for teen vogue and futurism (whatever the hell that is).
-11
5
0
Open reply Open reply
MyVeryRealName
@MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world · Aug 22
Thread reply
I like reading new words
17
0
0
Open reply Open reply
arararagi
@arararagi@ani.social · Aug 22
Thread reply
Why are you so mad about learning a new word? It's even faster to look their meaning today thanks to the internet.
10
0
0
Open reply Open reply
UltraGiGaGigantic
@UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml · Aug 22
Thread reply
Your comment is 100% poppycock.
8
0
0
Open reply Open reply
tigeruppercut
@tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip · Aug 22
Thread reply

Guess you never ran across that kids book from the 70s. Apparently it also became a Seattle mascot. Anyway I never thought of it as a fancy word.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheedle

https://lemmy.zip/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fen%2Fb%2Fb2%2FWheedle_on_the_Needle_-_35th_Anniversary_Edition.jpg
https://lemmy.zip/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fen%2Fb%2Fb2%2FWheedle_on_the_Needle_-_35th_Anniversary_Edition.jpg
6
0
0
Open reply Open reply
Komatoes
@Komatoes@discuss.online · Aug 23
Thread reply
Uh, that is a very basic word. It may be that is looks odd in print, but it's pretty common.
2
0
0
313k7r1n3 Elektrine

Tor hidden service

elekhj7afj4qnrr4yd3bkzslsyo5jgfxw3orgjkhlcxifueodybyiiad.onion

I2P eepsite

j6b6cyk6gjmepjih7jjadxgxvvf3lzzujljuu2v4biemzpg3naya.b32.i2p

Platform

  • Email
  • Chat
  • Timeline
  • VPN
  • DNS

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Lite (no JS)

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
  • Report Abuse
  • Warrant Canary
  • VPN Policy

Support

  • support@elektrine.com
  • Report Security Issue
Mail client setup IMAP mail.elektrine.com:993 POP3 mail.elektrine.com:995 SMTP mail.elektrine.com:465
© 2026 Elektrine. All rights reserved. sigkill.is Server: 04:11:37 UTC