I'm seeing an ever-increasing number of people investigating AI solutions that operate your computer for you. I must admit that I have great trepidation towards this notion. Of course, I can't look past the obvious benefits of being able to operate inaccessible software.
I tried Guide AI a while back, and it simply didn't meet my needs. I wanted to use it in full screen applications such as games, but you had to type to it, meaning, you had to leave the window. While it did offer a keystroke to jump quickly to its own window, it wasn't a good enough solution in my opinion.
Apart from the typing limitation, I found that it couldn't even perform the most simple tasks reliably. I didn't see value in it, because I kept running into message limitations in the trial. The model would take circuitous routes to do very basic things, such as opening task manager to verify that an app was running. It also launched the Xbox app in a way that left it stuck on the splash screen. Now, I don't have very many complimentary things to say about the Xbox app, but it at least has never done that when I launched it myself.
Naturally, this put me off using the service, and I canceled the trial, knowing that it would likely improve and that I'd be stuck paying more if I ever wanted it. The one good thing it had going for it though, was a kill switch. It narrated every action before attempting to perform it. If it was about to do something you didn't approve of, you could hit that keystroke and the entire task chain would be aborted.
Many of us are using Gemini, Codex, Claude code, and other agents. Those of us who've been doing this long enough will know that while the models can produce excellent results, they can just as quickly go down a path full of strange actions. They will proceed, full steam ahead, with great aplomb, down the wrong path. If left unsupervised, the best case is that you've burnt some tokens and you'll have to burn some more to have it walk back the changes. I don't think I have to enumerate what the worst case scenarios could be.
All this to say that I think I'll keep operating my computer without any assistance from AI tools for the time being. It means I'll miss out on some potential benefits, but I'm all right with that, and feel more secure in knowing that an AI agent isn't about to run amuck on my system. There are those who will read this and not like my position, which is fine. I've seen a lot of people snap to judgement calls and use terms like, "Ai hater", which honestly leads me to wonder if continuous use of LLMs have whittled away at their critical thinking skills.
With technology like this, one should always make an informed decision. Jumping on board with every single development in the field of generative AI is a choice, but it's one fraught with consequences.