Post by @cm0002@infosec.pub

@ns1@feddit.uk · Feb 27

Genius

https://infosec.pub/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffeddit.uk%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2F2086ee1e-f628-43ac-8308-5a2d3f4c0e30.webp

190

8

0

GreenKnight23

@GreenKnight23@lemmy.world · Feb 28

Thread reply

Closed as not planned

so much brainrot they burned themselves on accident

43

0

MNByChoice

@MNByChoice@midwest.social · Feb 27

Thread reply

For those wondering, yes, that was a real issue submitted. There are other issues, and they are great.

38

0

Mark with a Z

@markz@suppo.fi · Feb 27

Thread reply

Pure gold

34

0

ulterno

@ulterno@programming.dev · Feb 28

Thread reply

Owner does not plan on getting their brain to function properly

12

0

horn_e4_beaver

@horn_e4_beaver@discuss.tchncs.de · Feb 27

Privacy-First: No cameras required - uses WiFi signals for pose detection

That's not how privacy works.

108

1

0

kadu

@kadu@scribe.disroot.org · Feb 27

I have a visceral "AI" sensor that triggers when I see these:

"Rust Implementation (v2)"

"Performance Benchmarks (Validated)"

Human beings don't self-validate explicitly like that. AI loves doing it.

You generate code, there's a bug, you ask for a fix, your AI of choice will always output with:

*** Fix build issue ***

*** End fix ***

and then call it "Version 2 (Validated)".

Sometimes it's more subtle, but you can feel it, it loves adding "confirmed", "working", "validated".

91

23

0

FishFace

@FishFace@piefed.social · Feb 27

Thread reply

My sensor is much simpler. If I see emoji in headings or bulleted lists, I assume it's shit. It might be AI slop, or it might just be kids getting overexcited with the little pictures, but both deserve suspicion and scrutiny. If a bunch of the emoji don't even make sense it can get in the bin.

313

74

0

Eskuero

@eskuero@lemmy.fromshado.ws · Feb 27

Thread reply

This comment is so true 🚀🚀🚀

39

2

0

Steve

@Steve@startrek.website · Feb 27

Thread reply

💪

22

0

over_clox

@over_clox@lemmy.world · Feb 27

Thread reply

This comment has been confirmed and validated by an actual human being 👍

60

0

MajinBlayze

@MajinBlayze@lemmy.world · Feb 27

Thread reply

I have a project with a bunch of compose files that define the services I self host. I "deploy" the project by sshing into my server and doing "git pull" which means I'm often making changes that don't get tested before committing to source control. As a result I have long chains of commits like:

refactor the sproingy widget
refactor the sproingy widget v2
refactor the sproingy widget working
maybe the sproingy widget works this time?
ok finally found the issue with refactor sproingy widget
fix formatting of sproingy widget

And now I'm wondering if I've been an llm this whole time

17

8

0

exu

@exu@feditown.com · Feb 27

Thread reply

Make your changes in a new branch and rebase/squash when you push it to main.

14

2

0

IronKrill

@IronKrill@lemmy.ca · Feb 28

Thread reply

This also means modifying your git pull command to pull the correct branch. A small change perhaps, but may be harder than just committing to main lol.

I had a similar problem with GitHub actions, it was hard to test without messing up the main repo history.

6

0

housedogspacebirb

@housedogpartyfavor@lemmy.zip · Feb 28

Thread reply

No the AI would have called it fixed, “production-ready,” committed, and pushed after the first refactor.

11

0

kkj

@kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com · Mar 01

Thread reply

Why not just edit the YAML directly on the server via a command-line text editor or SSHFS and then push from there when it works?

2

0

N.E.P.T.R

@Neptr@lemmy.blahaj.zone · Feb 27

Thread reply

Also the repo image

2

0

DaddleDew

@DaddleDew@lemmy.world · Feb 27

I am no programmer and understand almost nothing of the documentation and yet somehow I can tell it's all bullshit. It reads like a kid making up words in an attempt to sound smart mixed up with the description for a shady Amazon product.

56

4

0

Mark with a Z

@markz@suppo.fi · Feb 27

Thread reply

I guess it's reading comprehension. Utter bullshit reeks the same regardless of the field.

28

0

over_clox

@over_clox@lemmy.world · Feb 27

Thread reply

That's absolutely awesome! I'm gonna start referring to this as 'smelling AI slop' You got the sense to sniff it out, even without programming experience. And that's a damn good sense to have these days 👍

12

0

SGforce

@SGforce@lemmy.ca · Feb 27

All of YC got bamboozled by this slop.

45

0

Xylight‮

@Xylight@lemdro.id · Feb 28

anyone gonna cop the $1500 hour session for agentic engineering

https://infosec.pub/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Ff004.backblazeb2.com%2Ffile%2Fxylight-public%2Frandom%2Friv.io.avif

33

2

0

ohshit604

@ohshit604@sh.itjust.works · Mar 01

Thread reply

2

0

gkak.laₛ

@gkaklas@lemmy.zip · Feb 27

Throughput metrics

Phase Sanitization 67-85 Melem/s

😆

(Turns out it does exist! But it's just a chemical https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melem )

Melem - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melem

32

6

0

Noja

@Noja@sopuli.xyz · Feb 27

Thread reply

Melem/s

https://c.tenor.com/o5G8byRwjxkAAAAd/tenor.gif

34

0

dfyx

@dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de · Feb 27

Thread reply

I think it’s meant to be short for Mega-elements, so millions of elements.

6

0

Mark with a Z

@markz@suppo.fi · Feb 27

Thread reply

Maybe the bot was just being sarcastic

4

0

Blackmist

@Blackmist@feddit.uk · Feb 28

Forgot to put "make sure the project compiles" in his .md files. What an amateur.

30

0

CannonFodder

@CannonFodder@lemmy.world · Feb 27

I mean well before AI, it was pretty common that a GitHub repo wouldn't compile.

27

2

0

chicken

@chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com · Feb 28

Thread reply

Maybe it's just me but *most* times I try to compile a software project from source, it's gonna take a long time figuring out stuff not mentioned in the readme and I will probably give up in the end.

20

0

over_clox

@over_clox@lemmy.world · Feb 27

And this is why I come up with stupid concepts like this, coding without numbers, just to fuck up artificial intelligence... https://lemmy.world/post/43158470 Sorry I said it was Friday, it was actually Sunday 🤦‍♂️

Simplifying the concepts of stupidity.. - Lemmy.World

I scratched the π formula this round, to simplify the concept. No digits allowed, they must emerge from pure garbage… Edit: Whoops, that was Sunday…

https://lemmy.world/post/43158470

23

6

0

flango

@flango@lemmy.eco.br · Feb 27

Thread reply

To be honest, I don't think that changes anything. Once you got the relation Z = 0, O = 1, etc., or whatever symbol you represent "1", "2", etc., you just have to do algebra.

10

6

0

over_clox

@over_clox@lemmy.world · Feb 27

Thread reply

Exactly. But it totally throws off AI.. I've got a more extended version I'm still casually working on when I get bored, which includes ELRUIYDAMB Care to guess what those letters mean numerically? I'll drop a clue, B=Billion

3

0

over_clox

@over_clox@lemmy.world · Feb 27

Thread reply

Also, how is AI gonna interpret such code without running it first? Its kinda easy for human eyes to see what I did, but how is AI gonna comprehend what letter equals what number?

3

0

LurkingLuddite

@LurkingLuddite@piefed.social · Feb 27

Thread reply

It doesn't comprehend _anything._ That's the damn point. Though it WILL "understand" what you did by the algorithms that break down code turning the variable into another token. So all you're really doing is costing yourself more time and money in the slop machine.

313

74

0

over_clox

@over_clox@lemmy.world · Feb 27

Thread reply

I don't participate in the slop machine yo. I'm just a regular human goober, just goofing off. I dunno how effective or not it might be, but feel free to do whatever you want, or don't want, with my code. Here's an update... https://lemmy.world/post/43646761

Can you code with no digits? - Lemmy.World

It’s still an experimental work in progress. At least I got the day of the week right this time!

https://lemmy.world/post/43646761

2

0

idunnololz

@idunnololz@lemmy.world · Feb 27

It's at 9k stars now

https://infosec.pub/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Flemmy.world%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2F697815bb-375f-44f1-bf23-d95ae1e3bf98.jpeg

19

2

0

MaggiWuerze

@MaggiWuerze@feddit.org · Feb 28

Thread reply

11k now

4

0

rem26_art

@rem26_art@fedia.io · Feb 27

Performance Benchmarks (Validated) yup, 100% totally validated. It's like when you buy something thats wayy too cheap for what it should be off of Temu and it shows up with a QC and Validation card that they clearly just print on a large sheet and cut down that says QC OK

19

2

0

Munkisquisher

@Munkisquisher@lemmy.nz · Feb 27

Thread reply

Oh the fancy ones are separate bits of paper. Mostly they print a qc check with a tick right onto the packaging

10

0

ramble81

@ramble81@lemmy.zip · Feb 27

Everyone’s talking about the different things that give it away and here I am with “WiFi dense human pose…” wtf

18

2

0

jacksilver

@jacksilver@lemmy.world · Mar 01

Thread reply

You can track/identify people in range of a wifi router based on how the wifi signal is disrupted. I believe that the original people claimed you could ID individual people using their approach, but I suspect that's under ideal conditions and/or with some training against individual people.

4

0