#changemanagement

4 posts · Last used 8d

Back to Timeline
Sanjay Mohindroo @smohindroo1@social.vivaldi.net · Aug 06, 2026
What's the biggest reason you've seen ERP or digital transformation initiatives struggle? Technology, or leadership decisions that came too late? I'm interested in hearing perspectives from CEOs, CIOs, board members, and transformation leaders. #Leadership #CIO #ERP #ERPImplementation #DigitalTransformation #BusinessTransformation #EnterpriseTechnology #ChangeManagement #BoardLeadership #BusinessStrategy #OperatingModel #TechnologyLeadership #ITStrategy #ExecutiveLeadership #TechnologyTrends https://stayingalive.in/cataloguing-strategic-innov/why-erp-rollouts-fail-the.html
0
0
0
Justin Derrick @JustinDerrick@mstdn.ca · Jul 15, 2026
Replying to @Celilander@chaos.social
@Celilander@chaos.social This needs hashtags to get into people's timelines! #GetFediHired and #FediHired at an absolutel minimum, but also stuff related to your interests / desired job -- #OpenSource #ChangeManagement etc...
0
0
0
Trond Hjorteland @trondhjort@hachyderm.io · May 27, 2026
Replying to @trondhjort@hachyderm.io
Organisational Dysfunction of the Day People resist change Context: The transformation programme has stalled. Change management consultants are brought in. Their diagnosis is familiar: the organisation has a change resistance problem. People are comfortable with the status quo, risk-averse, and slow to adopt new ways of working. The solution involves communication campaigns, stakeholder management, and training to help people become more comfortable with uncertainty. Leadership frames the resistance as a cultural issue — the organisation needs to become more adaptive. The change programme continues to stall. OST explains: A survey of the software industry found that 82.6% of people who had not experienced any organisational change were dissatisfied with the lack of it. They wanted change. What people consistently object to is not change itself but having change imposed on them — a completely different thing. When people are invited to participate in designing the change they need to make, the resistance largely disappears because there is nothing to resist; the change is theirs. OST's methods, i.e. the Search Conference and the Participative Design Workshop, are built entirely on this insight. The change management industry, with its stakeholder maps and communication cascades, often reflects a reluctance to involve people in designing their own work. It is treating the symptom of DP1 with more DP1. #OpenSystemsTheory #SocioTechnical #OrgDesign #changeManagement
4
1
4
Trond Hjorteland @trondhjort@hachyderm.io · Jun 05, 2026
Replying to @trondhjort@hachyderm.io
Organisational Dysfunction of the Day The pilot trap Context: The organisation wants to test a new way of working before committing to it fully. A pilot team is selected. They get more autonomy, a flatter structure, and direct access to the people they serve. The experiment is watched closely. Leadership visits. Consultants evaluate. Progress is tracked and reported. The team delivers well. They are energised and proud of what they have built together. Then the question of scaling comes up. Resistance appears, not from people far away, but from those closest to the experiment. The managers whose teams were not selected. The HR department asked to create exceptions for the pilot. The architects whose standards the pilot bypassed. The steering committee that was promised a clear verdict. The experiment ends, or quietly returns to normal. The organisation concludes that the approach works in theory but is not right for them. OST explains: Merrelyn Emery identified this dynamic as paradoxical inhibition, drawing on Pavlov's research on conditioning: the people and areas closest to structural change feel most threatened by it and develop the strongest resistance, while those at a safer distance are more likely to adopt it. Norway lived this in the 1960s. The Industrial Democracy Programme experiments worked. The experiments did not spread. Sweden picked up the ideas and ran with them instead. Treating change as a pilot produces exactly this effect. Those around the pilot are confronted daily with a visible alternative to their own way of working. That is not a neutral situation. It is a structural provocation. Partial DP2 in a DP1 organisation is inherently unstable, not because the experiment fails on its own terms, but because the surrounding system has every structural reason to absorb or eliminate it. This is not cynicism or politics. It is the immune system of DP1 doing exactly what it was designed to do. The only way to avoid the pilot trap is not to pilot. You cannot sneak DP2 past DP1 one team at a time. The fence will hold. #OpenSystemsTheory #SocioTechnical #OrgDesign #changemanagement
16
4
9

You've seen all posts