Cress

@mu @mathew @AlSweigart Yeah you know Mu, I think your from NZ right - you are blessed with good govourning there and dont seem to have a serious right wing issue I lost count of bad eggs in Europe and the UK and now the US in the last decade So maybe the real problem is education - school at home or society in general I dont want to get rid of people and totally get people go into politics from a perspevctive of care. But politics in the North seems art of division not togetherness IMHO

@mu @mathew @AlSweigart My orginal comment was just to take out the fckn ego crap from leadership - surely "smart" people can work out how to do that using modern tech, and still have a lovely country to live in and not have so much waste. I am not saying I have all the answers, only I see a major issue at the moment - thats pretty obbvious right? LOL

@mu @mathew @AlSweigart Yeah like I said it needs to be thought through its not a comment about a micro-architecture, need to use some creativity - imagine taking learning from the best minds in society, could be for example, gov has 10000 objectives, then the people in society are polled and paid for their advice (lets say 500k people). Then solutions that come back are used in training. Objectives will be balanced by data from the society and environment using scientific bodies and papers

@mathew @mu @AlSweigart True, this helped me understand: https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/ai-vs-machine-learning-vs-deep-learning-vs-neural-networks I am thinking though in a few years we should be able to ask questions of these systems, what ever level of AI we get to, to example draw up a national budget or list natitonal priorities for the population (for example health care vs military), not just to the benefit of some prime minister or president. Maybe we are already running these models. I dont know.

@mu@mastodon.nz @AlSweigart@mastodon.social Isnt that what we want (zero ego, conflict of interest, divide and rule, misappropriation of funds, war mongering errr 🙂 anyway its an idea, seems way better to have a neural net making choices than certain people at large in the world at the moment)

@whatzaname @AndrewRadev So in Europe, which is where I can speak for, we see mass layoff happening for multiple resons If its adjusting to market forces, well we see the social protections trying to reflect that But with AI mass job replacements its much deeper Imagine for example you are 10 years from retirement and your lifelong skillset is thrown in the trash OK thats maybe going to happen anyway, but dont let the tax payers pay for costs of unemployment for the employers gain!

@slotos @AlSweigart Did not know about this until I read an article - thats interesting: https://www.blockchain-council.org/blockchain/blockchain-based-voting-systems/ Personally I think we just as a species/planet need to get human emotions out of the picture in making big decisions - like digging up all the last oil, starting wars etc. We have to have some level headed advice and decisions, OK, we can put human gate-post on it. But it should never be 1 individual or party. I would even say for local issues it can be left alone!

@AlSweigart@mastodon.social Compare the rather obvious "baiting" by AI's with the convoluted lies and manipulations by humans at the moment on the world stage. I'd much rather have an AI running the show as long as its trained only by compassionate and aware human data, themselves elected from society. Then have the civil servants carry out all the work and offer in AI guardrails. Keep the ego's and lies out of leadership! Bring back Transparency and Integrity. Just an Idea 😉

@AndrewRadev It cannot be right that the money a company saves through this tech is then "picked up" by the state (and thus our taxes) in unemployment and social protections. We all are going to be affected to a greater or lesser degree by this, there needs to be new legislation to protect sacked workers and tax payers. This needs to be a very expensive decision for employers.