Post #2379448
2025-11-20 03:15 UTC
Replies (14)
-
@baltakatei@twit.social 2025-11-20 03:42
@leo@60228.dev “True”. I'm doing with “True”. ggez
-
@mfzx.net@bsky.brid.gy 2025-11-20 03:51
1900353809, 7718523721
-
@gsuberland@chaos.social 2026-01-26 03:06
@leo@60228.dev Bender: "I need a calculator." Fry: "but you ARE a calculator." Bender: "I mean a GOOD calculator."
-
@paula8@netzsphaere.xyz 2026-01-26 03:42
@leo@60228.dev 14667925953059203289 x 1
-
@Axolotl1@gaygeek.social 2026-01-26 04:11
@leo@60228.dev bananer
-
@catsalad@infosec.exchange 2026-01-26 04:17
@leo@60228.dev @Axolotl1@gaygeek.social 1 × 14667925953059203289 :neodog_mask_bot:
-
@NuclearOatmeal@beige.party 2026-01-26 04:19
@leo@60228.dev 14667925953059203289 * 1
-
@loke@functional.cafe 2026-01-26 04:24
@leo@60228.dev I have no idea why I actually fed those numbers to the factorisation function in my programming language. It took 28 seconds. I need a better algorithm.
-
@estelle@mstdn.social 2026-01-26 04:51
@leo@60228.dev gnu coreutils factor does this nearly as quickly as pressing the enter key but i am too dumb to understand the algorithm used after reading the code for 30 seconds, therefore i am not robot
-
@apophis@kill-corporations.enterprises 2026-01-26 08:31
@leo@60228.dev first blank: 0 second blank: 1 + 14667925953059203289 (pemdas applies right?)
-
@kyouu@social.xenofem.me 2026-01-26 10:13
@leo@60228.dev the answer is 3 and 27. Tell me if you'd like me to change anything!
-
@loganer@mastodon.social 2026-01-26 13:17
@leo@60228.dev 14667925953059203289 x 1 = 14667925953059203289
-
@stupeflo@pipou.academy 2026-01-26 13:17
@leo@60228.dev Much x a_lot
-
@Kingu@sakurajima.moe 2026-01-26 15:39
@leo@60228.dev 14667925953059203289 x 1