#racialjustice

5 posts · Last used 27d

Back to Timeline
Diligence Jones @DeliaChristina@sfba.social · Nov 12, 2022
#Introduction: Bay Area/Oakland Gen-Xer; Nonprofit Exec in the civil rights space; funny as hell but my politics are clear and Left AF. Interests: #Intersectional #Feminism; #GenderJustice; #RacialJustice; #nonprofits; #Philanthropy; Little old lady mysteries, Multicultural romances, & Remington Steele (Only God can judge me.) New 🐕 mom to Benson. Relationship Status/Style: I'm a soft, mean SoPo 🔝 . Kink/Shenanigans: Yes. IYKYK Oxford comma forever. Learning: Mastodon
111
0
60
br00t4c @br00t4c@mastodon.social · Jul 09, 2026
0
0
0
br00t4c @br00t4c@mastodon.social · Jul 08, 2026
1
0
3
Eric Darnley Small @ericdsmall@mastodon.vtip.me · Dec 10, 2025
Boosted by CM Harrington @octothorpe@mastodon.online
The Justice Department has finalized new regulations that effectively eliminate the use of “disparate impact” analysis—a key tool for proving racial discrimination based on statistical disparities—marking a significant rollback of civil rights protections. These regulations, issued without public comment, narrow the ability of government and private entities to be investigated or sued for policies that unintentionally cause racial disparities, focusing instead on intent-based discrimination. The move aligns with conservative arguments that discrimination should only be proven through explicit intent, rather than data showing unequal impact. Critics warn that this shift could weaken efforts to address systemic racial inequities, as it makes it significantly harder to challenge policies that unintentionally disadvantage marginalized groups. More here: https://wapo.st/4s2l6iC #CivilRights #DisparateImpact #JusticeDepartment #RacialJustice #RegulatoryChange #LegalPolicy #discrimination
7
1
10

You've seen all posts