Alexander Kustov's complaints about academics resisting AI ("Academics need to wake up about AI") seem to be getting a lot of play, even as they drive a lot of hostility, but while he is right about quite a bit, he is also very wrong about some very important things.
the narrow (and exclusive) definition of academia in terms of knowledge production is a dead end and fatal to the idea of education. when you say “academics,” most people don’t think you mean “but not the teaching part,” and when you say "AI" they don't think you mean "but not for learning to read and write."
so if you’re concerned about precision at all, which a social scientist presumably is, you should step back and think about what you’re saying, and to whom, and refine your language. otherwise you’re just doing the same misleading clickbait-y stories that produce the bs slop research you’re ostensibly complaining about.
https://jeffreyfisher.substack.com/p/homer-was-never-called-a-stochastic
#ai #education #pedagogy #teaching