@meluzzy@woof.tech Actually, now that I think about it, here's a line of debate. I think I already know your answer but I'd like to raise some questions about this:
A lot of really powerful tools we take as essential are MIT licensed. Like, Rust is dual licensed under MIT and Apache. I can see the utility here--this invites contributors to the project from other places, which comes with the unfortunate side effect that they might have evil intentions. But, in a way, we get time and labor redistribution from powerful entities into something good, don't we?
Linux is licensed under the GPL and you can see the benefits here as well. Google took Linux under it's wing when launching Android. Their contributions to the ARM side of things are probably immeasureable, and while I hate them, we can't discount those contributions. And yet, even licensed under GPL, Google is free to commit atrocity after anti-consumer atrocity, even if they have to distribute the kernel sources as-is to the point of sale.
So, while in principle I see the point here, GPL doesn't prevent Linux servers from powering every company we hate and then some. Furthermore, MIT doesn't immediately allow evil to be done... or rather. GPL doesn't prevent evil.