Often that can be circumvented by using a site like archive.is. Not with every site which paywalls articles, depending on the paywall implementation, but a lot of them.
Remote
Ben
@adversary@chaos.social
mastodon
4.5.15
☿ Author, publisher, civil liberties activist, political junkie, security geek; #GnuPG Project developer.
0
Followers
0
Following
7
Posts
Joined March 31, 2018
Website:
Publishing:
Verification:
OpenPGP Key ID:
DB4724E6FA4286C92B4E55C4321E4E2373590E5D
Posts
Holy shit. Someone I've known since the '90s just blocked me for the #intersex thread.
Replying to
@adversary@chaos.social
It did not take long at all for the first interphobe to come out of the woodwork following that 24 part beast on why the Contributor Covenant sucks.
Only two hours.
Mind you, on Twitter that sort of thing would bring out the interphobes in about two minutes. So I guess it's an improvement.
Well, that ought to set the cat amongst the pigeons ...
Replying to
@dazinism@social.coop
@dazinism
I finally got around to addressing this in another thread.
Start here:
https://chaos.social/@adversary/109855518694399282
Warning: it's very long, but you need to read it all.
It should be obvious at the end of that why I do not believe the #ContributorCovenant can be salvaged or "made good."
Yes, the point made in post 19 of that thread absolutely applies to social.coop. Especially when you admit to driving minorities away during the course of adopting your CoC.
Replying to
@adversary@chaos.social
@dazinism @rixx Anyway, you might not want to discuss this with me. As a public signatory to the Darlington Statement, I'm automatically in breach of your instance's CoC as intended by its original author from the GeekFeminism Wiki (I believe it is still online, but as an archive), Tim Chevalier.
You can read the Darlington Statement here:
https://darlington.org.au/statement/
Replying to
@dazinism@social.coop
@dazinism @rixx So you managed to democratically maintain and even enhance an #interphobic #coc.
Instances like yours are why I went explicitly went out of my way to find an instance which included protections for people like me, which chaos.social has; in addition to the being a bunch of anarchists and geeks.
You lot, however, have clearly derived your policy from the Contributor Covenant and its predecessor, the Geek Feminism Wiki policies. Both have the interphobia baked in (on purpose).