@jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net
Post #3266618
2026-06-10 14:57 UTC
Replies (40)
-
@edd@freeradical.zone 2026-06-13 02:48
@jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net Damnit... don't make me switch now...
-
@nev@status.nevillepark.ca 2026-06-13 01:08
@jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net but what's nano's position
-
@paul_ipv6@infosec.exchange 2026-06-11 23:42
@jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net emacs will always be safe. eliza would kick any AI's butt.
-
@passthejoe@snac.bsd.cafe 2026-06-11 21:18
@a1cswc3mhdfa0gh8@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net What about nvi?
-
@ed1conf@bsd.network 2026-06-11 18:00
@jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net *coughs*
-
@wec@fv390.hs.bam.moe 2026-06-11 17:11
you know who's still alive and unslopped? Elvis!!! CC: @a1cswc3mhdfa0gh8@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net
-
@ari@masto.doskel.net 2026-06-11 16:20
@jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net https://vim-or-emacs.ari.lt/ maybe itll change in the over 2 years this poll has been alive
-
@emmy@transfem.social 2026-06-11 15:42
@jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net That's great news! Do you have a link about Emacs banning AI contributions?
-
@joel@gts.tumfatig.net 2026-06-11 11:35
@jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net I thought war was about Emacs vs Vi, not Vim. (this is a biaised reply ;-)
-
@deech@mastodon.social 2026-06-11 11:04
@jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net Great news! Do you have a link to the emacs policy?
-
@fenouilla_systema@mathstodon.xyz 2026-06-11 09:56
@aethor@fosstodon.org !!!
-
@jeffmcneill@hachyderm.io 2026-06-11 07:50
@jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net emacs had been declaring victory since its inception, nothing new here.
-
@em_7dice@tech.lgbt 2026-06-11 05:14
@jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net After some cursory searching, I wasn't able to see if nano has had anything to say on the subject of ai. It's also a GNU project though, so I hope she follows the example of her sister.
-
@zmz@mastodon.social 2026-06-11 00:38
@jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net 😢
-
@BoydStephenSmithJr@hachyderm.io 2026-06-10 23:33
@jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net As a vim user, I want to point out a small resistance cell still active: https://sr.ht/~sircmpwn/vim-classic/ So, there may be more battles, yet. But, I agree the war has been won.
-
@mdhughes@appdot.net 2026-06-10 23:03
@jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net No, now is the time of ed (1), the standard text editor. #ed
-
@elfin@mstdn.social 2026-06-10 21:53
@jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net Yeahhhhh, no. Those are vim plugins for LLMs and I hate to break it to ya' but emacs has the same slop https://github.com/rksm/org-ai Nano doesn't have that problem (yet).
-
@ireneista@adhd.irenes.space 2026-06-10 21:40
@jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net mm. vi has inspired more descendants than Emacs has.
-
@rl_dane@polymaths.social 2026-06-10 21:10
@jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net Nothing against emacs, but just for those wanting another alternative, https://vim-classic.org/
-
@resuna@ohai.social 2026-06-10 20:42
@jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net What does vim have to do with it? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nvi
-
@reiddragon@fedi.catto.garden 2026-06-10 19:13
@jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net we're not going down so easy! https://codeberg.org/evi-editor/evi/
-
@ori@woem.men 2026-06-10 18:43
@jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net we have been looking for a reason to give emacs a shot
-
@veya@girldick.gay 2026-06-10 18:33
@jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net it's time for me to start E-maxxing
-
@alreadydeadxd@infosec.exchange 2026-06-10 16:56
@jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net wdym vim is ai slop?
-
@xerozohar@retro.pizza 2026-06-10 16:13
@jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net oh no what did they do to my boy? :blobcat_brokenheart:
-
@hazel@shrimp.starlightnet.work 2026-06-10 16:03
@jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net :neofox_pensive:
-
@StupidCamille@eldritch.cafe 2026-06-10 15:59
@jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net it's such an unexpected turn of events given how much emacs users love to write packages to integrate every LLMs in every parts of Emacs and only talk about AI. But I'm glad they're banned from the core project
-
@jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net 2026-06-10 15:22
any remaining vim users should migrate to emacs with viper-mode :3c
-
@link@meowing.men 2026-06-10 15:18
@jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net this is so catphobic
-
@bazkie@beige.party 2026-06-10 15:12
@jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net yay! I knew emacs was better than vim!
-
@jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net 2026-06-10 14:58
the 2020s are all about do nothing: win
-
@christmastree@mastodon.social 2026-06-14 10:17
@jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net as a lifetime vim user ... agreed
-
@gregsie@floss.social 2026-06-14 08:05
@jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net one editor is all you need and that editor is nano
-
@brettm@swarm.coiloptic.org 2026-06-14 06:54
@a1cswc3mhdfa0gh8@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net last i heard its just a temporary ban and they will eventually do whatever the Vatican oops i mean the Free Software Foundation decides
-
@rogerparkinson@mastodon.nz 2026-06-13 22:37
@jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net I forget who first said it but often the first (decent) editor you encounter will always be your favorite. For me it was editch running on pdp11s back in the mid 70s, but maybe that doesn't count as 'decent', it was designed to work on lineflow terminals after all. So the next one I met was vi, and I still use that. Never bothered with vim or emacs.
-
@alexmu@social.vivaldi.net 2026-06-13 21:34
@jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net do you have a minute to talk about our lord and saviour vim classic: https://vim-classic.org/?
-
@minus9@hachyderm.io 2026-06-13 21:03
@jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net Emacs users desperate to pile on with their gnarled and broken hands. 😏
-
@chx@chx.contact 2026-06-13 19:54
@jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net https://sr.ht/~sircmpwn/vim-classic/
-
@molytov@infosec.exchange 2026-06-13 19:53
@jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net Okay but now there's a new problem: having to learn how the fuck to use it
-
@c0dec0dec0de@hachyderm.io 2026-06-13 11:16
@jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net damnit, neovim also allows slop.