Post #1183236
2026-04-16 03:09 UTC
Replies (40)
-
@ehashman@cloudisland.nz 2026-04-30 00:46
IPv8 update: https://seclists.org/nanog/2026/Apr/96
-
@davidism@mas.to 2026-04-16 03:17
@ehashman@cloudisland.nz Going in, I thought I might be. But I was not, in fact, ready.
-
@arrjay@tacobelllabs.net 2026-04-16 03:20
@ehashman@cloudisland.nz I WAS NOT READY
-
@silverwizard@convenient.email 2026-04-16 03:19
uh, what? what?! @ehashman@cloudisland.nz
-
@whitequark@social.treehouse.systems 2026-04-16 03:35
@ehashman@cloudisland.nz wow
-
@jawnsy@mastodon.social 2026-04-16 03:51
@ehashman@cloudisland.nz Nice
-
@chrisvest@mastodon.social 2026-04-16 04:06
@ehashman@cloudisland.nz I kinda lost it at the JWTs but it kept spiraling
-
@twodarek@hachyderm.io 2026-04-16 04:18
2^32 addresses is enough for any single ASN, right? (I didn't get further than the abstract, too late to read further) @ehashman@cloudisland.nz
-
@aismallard@woem.space 2026-04-16 04:28
@ehashman@cloudisland.nz what.
-
@nickapos@mastodon.oncrete.uk 2026-04-16 04:35
@ehashman@cloudisland.nz It will be great for isps with a captive audience. 100% packet traceability 0% privacy. What are we waiting for
-
@nelson@wetdry.world 2026-04-16 04:47
@ehashman@cloudisland.nz what in the fuck...?
-
@fxchip@hachyderm.io 2026-04-16 04:55
@ehashman@cloudisland.nz Is this... for real?
-
@Daveography@yeg.bike 2026-04-16 04:55
@ehashman@cloudisland.nz Noooo, I still haven't figured out IPv6
-
@itgrrl@infosec.exchange 2026-04-16 05:20
@ehashman@cloudisland.nz that’s just IPv6 with two extra cylinders so it goes faster 💁♀️ wake me when they release an RFC for IPv11… 🙃
-
@kit@m.tripulse.link 2026-04-16 05:41
@ehashman@cloudisland.nz commercials for ipv8 will involve a disembodied hand slamming a router down onto the table followed by a deep voice saying "could have had ipv8"
-
@tisba@ruby.social 2026-04-16 06:07
@ehashman@cloudisland.nz funny that IPv6 is only mentioned in two places, each with exactly the same two sentences!
-
@synlogic4242@social.vivaldi.net 2026-04-16 06:07
@ehashman@cloudisland.nz cant tell if its serious or parody.
-
@wrybane@wizzards.club 2026-04-16 06:10
@ehashman@cloudisland.nz - uses 8 in the header's version field - "no existing device requires modification" Why isn't it dated April 1?
-
@meena@cathode.church 2026-04-16 06:14
@ehashman@cloudisland.nz my partner works for prpl foundation, so I've heard (bad things) about WiFi 6, and she skipped over 7, but told me that there's rumours of WiFi 8 already. I didn't realise that there's a whole rat's tail of other midlife crisis sounding stuff attached to it
-
@grindhold@23.social 2026-04-16 06:20
@ehashman@cloudisland.nz "Devices communicate only with their designated service gateway. The service gateway communicates only with the designated cloud service. Lateral movement between devices or zones is architecturally prevented by the absence of any permitted route to any other destination." WTF
-
@cereal_cable@mastodon.social 2026-04-16 06:22
@ehashman@cloudisland.nz absolutely nuts, it's too late to be seeing this shit.
-
@ojs@c.im 2026-04-16 06:27
@ehashman@cloudisland.nz what ever happened to v7?
-
@wohali@timeloop.cafe 2026-04-16 06:31
@ehashman@cloudisland.nz this is getting too much traction, it's just your standard net.krank shitpost
-
@Conornash@mastodon.social 2026-04-16 06:33
@ehashman@cloudisland.nz I’ll raise you one https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv9_(China)
-
@makefu@jit.social 2026-04-16 06:36
@ehashman@cloudisland.nz
-
@mkyral@mastodonczech.cz 2026-04-16 07:29
@ehashman@cloudisland.nz Soon will be replaced by IPvA
-
@baller3000@mastodon.social 2026-04-16 07:32
nice protocol
-
@moellus@wandzeitung.xyz 2026-04-16 07:39
@ehashman@cloudisland.nz Hmm, let's wait and see what @tschaefer@ipv6.social has to say about it. :meow_blink:
-
@NobodysNightmare@toot.berlin 2026-04-16 08:42
@ehashman@cloudisland.nz WTF, is this a serious proposal? I only made it to the introduction part until thinking that the language is more marketing than usually expected from an RFC.
-
@meph@social.treehouse.systems 2026-04-16 08:52
RE: https://cloudisland.nz/@ehashman/116412184116807348 @ehashman@cloudisland.nz ... jesus christ.
-
@simon@tutut.delire.party 2026-04-16 08:58
@ehashman@cloudisland.nz it’s… not published on april 1st?
-
@stuartl@mastodon.longlandclan.id.au 2026-04-16 09:25
@ehashman@cloudisland.nz Right… so we can expect this … when… 2044? 2054? #IPv6 was first presented as a draft in 1998 and some places still don't have it.
-
@bwh@tech.lgbt 2026-04-16 09:32
@ehashman@cloudisland.nz Why use v8 when the clearly superior v10 was proposed years ago: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-omar-ipv10/10/
-
@timoj@mastodon.online 2026-04-16 09:48
@ehashman@cloudisland.nz He lost me at the first JWT reference. Wha’?
-
@Ganneff@fulda.social 2026-04-16 10:38
@ehashman@cloudisland.nz v8? Let's wait for v42, that will answer (and end) all questions!
-
@uncledave@dobbs.town 2026-04-16 12:21
@ehashman@cloudisland.nz April 1 was a couple weeks ago
-
@philip@mastodon.mallegolhansen.com 2026-04-16 15:50
@ehashman@cloudisland.nz @bagder@mastodon.social Given the timeline on IPv6 rollout, I feel like anyone who is alive today can safely ignore it as “future tech” 😂
-
@pmc@mastodon.ffcentral.net 2026-04-16 16:14
@ehashman@cloudisland.nz This reads like an April Fools joke
-
@bjb@fosstodon.org 2026-04-16 17:42
@ehashman@cloudisland.nz "Every packet transiting to the internet is validated at egress against a DNS8 lookup and a WHOIS8 registered active route." I can see why people think it is a joke. How to slow down transit times. I only got as far as this, not sure what a "WHOIS8 registered active route" is. Probably don't want to know. Eeeuuuuggghh.
-
@abstrm@fosstodon.org 2026-04-16 18:17
@ehashman@cloudisland.nz This is of course trash but a certain type of person will love it. Anyway the funniest thing to me is the mixed decimal and hex notation, so I guess 30 is less than 1f. Also that notation is not defined anywhere, they just use it randomly.