#privacylaw

3 posts · Last used 18d

Back to Timeline
Em :official_verified: @Em0nM4stodon@infosec.exchange · Nov 02, 2025
Just so you know, we need to push back against privacy-invasive regulations. Each and every time. Shrugging and using a VPN will not save you. They will come for the VPNs next. Then the ISPs. Then more. Pushing against unjust laws matters. The tools alone will not save you in the long run. #Privacy #PrivacyLaw #AgeVerification
578
27
496
Francisca Sinn @fsinn@mas.to · Jul 08, 2026
RE: https://mastodon.social/@zackwhittaker/116884302738509527 100% And I reiterate, we can not have democracy without privacy. #PervertGlasses #PrivacyLaw #PrivacyRights #PersonalData #FacialRecognition #SmartGlasses #Democracy
Quoting
Zack Whittaker @zackwhittaker@mastodon.social
Smart glasses with cameras and microphones built-in and facial recognition to come are the latest fad in surveillance tech. For my blog & newsletter ~ this week in security ~ I wrote about why the backlash against smart glasses — aka "pervert glasses" — is justified from a security and privacy perspective. Please read and share! More: https://this.weekinsecurity.com/reframing-smart-glasses-as-pervert-glasses/ Sign up/RSS for my weekly newsletter: https://this.weekinsecurity.com
Open quoted post
5
0
14
Em :official_verified: @Em0nM4stodon__dup_1827@infosec.exchange · Nov 19, 2025
Boosted by Dread Pirate (Tom) Roberts @troberts@theblower.au
I feel this needs to be repeated 🍪 The annoyance of cookie banners doesn't come from the regulations, but from the malicious compliance of the corporations who want to exploit your personal data. No data-harvesting cookies = No banner. Simple. My websites have no cookie banners, because they don't use any non-essential cookies and don't track visitors. Yours shouldn't either. #Privacy #Cookies #PrivacyLaw
1349
59
1144

You've seen all posts