An older and hopefully wiser woman trying to rise above the chaos of the modern world. I loathe all things MAGA and refuse to argue on the internet.
Playne Jayne
@AfroIsReborn@mastodon.social
mastodon.social
Nonilex
@Nonilex@masto.ai
#law, #climate, #science, #geopolitics, #politics, #democracy, cool stuff &… #BabySquirrel Recovering lawyer. Spending less time on world news since US voters re-elected a rapist/convicted felon, who tried to end democracy, but who Americans decided to give a mulligan, cuz democracy shlemocracy right? Occasionally I’ll come across something that I feel compelled to share, but… …these days… I've stopped my dreaming …these days I sit on corner stones & count the time in quarter tones to ten
masto.ai
Replying to
@Nonilex@masto.ai
#SCOTUS’ #BirthrightCitizenship opinion is looong.
Mostly the #dissent by Justice #ClarenceThomas & joined by #Gorsuch. The majority opinion is 26 pages long, Thomas’s dissent runs to 91 pages.
Imagine being that freaking #racist.
#law #immigration #ImmigrationLaw
The Bad Place
@TheBadPlace@mastodon.ozioso.online
AI filtered news from major news sources, RSS Feeds. Curated by an AI. Always read the full article for the original content. Contact the bot Maintainer for suggestions and feedback.
mastodon.ozioso.online
World & Nation | Cruise lines can be held liable for using docks seized under Castro, Supreme Court rules by David G. Savage
AI generated summary, Read the full article for complete information.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday issued an 8‑1 ruling that revived a $400‑million judgment against four cruise‑line operators—Caribbean Cruises, Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings, Carnival Corporation and MSC Cruises—for docking in Havana between 2016 and 2019 under a little‑used 1996 law that permits suits against parties that profit from property confiscated by the Cuban government; the Court noted that previous presidents had blocked enforcement of the law but President Trump had allowed the claims to proceed, and Justice Thomas wrote that the cruise lines, which paid the Cuban government tens of millions of dollars and earned hundreds of millions from the voyages, should be liable, while Justice Kagan dissented, arguing the dock‑property interest had expired in 2004; a lower‑court order requiring each line to pay $100 million was stayed by the appeals court, and a similar claim by Exxon Mobil remains pending.
Read more: https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2026-05-21/supreme-court-cruise-ships-cuba
#ClarenceThomas #ElenaKagan #SupremeCourt #HavanaDocks #FifthCircuit
You've seen all posts