Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google.
Opinions my own.
Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
In order to go viral on Mastodon, your post should include at least one cat and some criticism of AI. So here is Binah disliking large language models.
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Help me settle this important issue with my wife, @saraislet@infosec.exchange
How many presidents had sex at least once in the Oval Office after becoming president?
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
My hot take on the vulnpocalypse:
We don't have more vulnerabilities than we had before. The vulnerabilities were always there, we just didn't know they existed. But importantly, for moderately sophisticated attackers, who only have to find a relatively low number of vulns to begin with, not much has changed. Yeah it's a little bit cheaper, but finding vulns wasn't all that difficult, depending on the target. For defenders otoh, making the finding of vulns cheaper is theoretically a good thing, but we already had not enough capacity to fix the vulns found by fuzz testing and similar methods before, so this is just adding on the pile of stuff we know is broken, but can't keep up with fixing it. The net effect seems to be that we made triage more expensive. Yay.
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
I have to say, publishing results as zero knowledge proof does have one benefit: it tricks security researchers into learning about quantum circuits. This is some amazing work!
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
I'm being quoted. Apocalypse! It's the end of the world (as we know it)! Oh noes!
https://gizmodo.com/how-should-we-prepare-for-the-looming-quantum-encryption-apocalypse-2000744543
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
I post links about the quantum thing. That is my life now, I guess.
Anyways, here is Cloudflare following suit and setting 2029 as target date, and Scott slowing losing his mind over people being dumb on the internet.
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
And the posts, they keep on coming.
I hundred percent agree with @filippo@abyssdomain.expert here, the question is not whether we're certain that a quantum computer exists by 2029, it's whether we're certain that one doesn't exist. And things have progressed far enough that non-physicists, or even physicists working in different subfields, can no longer reliably tell what's going on.
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
Leading cryptography (ISE Crypto) at Google. Opinions my own. Content usually badly explained mathematics
A very nice explainer why "if you're so worried about quantum computers, why haven't they factored 21 yet?" isn't a very convincing argument. Look at the labels of the graph, and how extremely close the various lines are for factoring 21 and 2048 bit numbers. Polynomial scaling remains polynomial, unfortunately, and by the time you can factor 21 you're almost ready to break RSA.
