Posts
Journalists stand up for their independence
Dear Friend of Press Freedom:
The fight for the free press is being waged on multiple fronts. This week: media mergers meant to please Trump, search warrants targeting journalists, government gag orders, and Catherine Herridge’s battle to protect confidential sources. Read on for more.
Journalists stand up for their independence
This week Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF) led an open letter from current and former journalists and journalism professors sounding the alarm on the proposed Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery merger. Paramount CEO David Ellison has shown that he’s eager to throw the press under the bus to curry favor with the Trump administration.
We also held a press conference during which journalists and documentarians Kara Swisher, Jim Acosta, Katie Phang, Laura Poitras — who is also an FPF board member — and Geeta Gandbhir spoke out against the threat of corporate collusion with the government to censor the news. They don’t want a CBS repeat if Ellison takes over Warner holdings like CNN and HBO.
Neither does Sharyn Alfonsi, one of five journalists fired from “60 Minutes” yesterday, and one of nearly 250 signatories of our letter.
A federal judge twice rejected search warrant applications for the YouTube accounts of journalists Don Lemon and Georgia Fort, according to court records unsealed this week. Federal prosecutors sought the warrants in connection with the spurious criminal cases they’re pursuing against Lemon and Fort for covering a protest at a church in St. Paul, Minnesota.
FPF Senior Advocacy Adviser Caitlin Vogus — who also wrote about the warrants in The Guardian — said in a statement: “These failed search warrants are what happens when incompetent prosecutors pursue political vendettas instead of justice.”
The Washington Post reported that the Trump administration is planning a broad, government-wide nondisclosure agreement to combat leaks to the press.
FPF Daniel Ellsberg Chair on Government Secrecy Lauren Harper said in a statement that the proposal “would kneecap whistleblower protections, undermine the First Amendment, and wrongly inhibit the public’s right to know.” She added, “It comes at a time when agency watchdogs are sidelined, FOIA officials are being fired, and leaks to the press … are being demonized and prosecuted.”
The latest decision in journalist Catherine Herridge’s legal fight over confidential sources highlights how fragile the reporter-source privilege remains in the absence of a federal shield law.
On May 22, a federal appeals court refused to reconsider its previous order forcing Herridge to identify her confidential sources, and it asked the public to accept its decision without immediate access to the court records we need to fully understand it.
The best solution to this mess is for Congress to provide clear, strong protection against compelled disclosure of journalists’ sources by passing a shield law like the PRESS Act.
President Donald Trump has once again hijacked the court system to further his corruption. He purportedly “settled” litigation with his own Department of Justice in exchange for a $1.8 billion slush fund to compensate political allies.
But before the DOJ facilitated Trump laundering his self-dealing through the courts, Federal Communications Commission Chair Brendan Carr helped Trump shake down Paramount to settle a frivolous lawsuit to clear the regulatory path for its merger with Skydance.
As FPF Chief of Advocacy Seth Stern explained, the Washington, D.C. Bar could have put a stop to it then by disciplining Carr pursuant to FPF’s complaint, but they chickened out. Now we see the consequences.
Arrests of noncitizen journalists during Trump 2.0 are fueling concerns that the United States may not be a safe place to report for the thousands of foreign reporters expected to travel here to cover the 2026 FIFA Men’s World Cup starting in June.
Our U.S. Press Freedom Tracker’s West Coast reporter, Briana Erickson, analyzed Tracker data and spoke to journalists about the attacks on the press that are fueling those concerns.
National Public Radio
Stern discussed FPF’s recent attorney disciplinary complaint against Florida Judge Jeffrey Kuntz for failing to recuse himself from Trump’s frivolous case against the Pulitzer Prize Board while seeking a judicial nomination from his administration.
U.S. Press Freedom Tracker
For more on the World Cup and the threats facing journalists, check out FPF Chief of Editorial Kirstin McCudden’s interview with Erickson.
Free Press
The ever-growing surveillance state is insatiable and poses unique challenges for reporters and their sources. Read about the new coalition, of which FPF is a member, and explore ways to fight back.
L.A. Taco
The detention of yet another journalist for covering a protest is more evidence that the Los Angeles Police Department won’t learn to respect the First Amendment and journalists’ rights until courts make them.
Backroom Deals Miranda Spivack
Thank goodness the First Amendment Foundation plans to take this new law aimed at stifling dissent in Florida to court.
Columbia Journalism Review
White House access now mostly means front row seats to lies and insults. Journalists should skip the photo ops and dig into the administration’s misconduct, with or without access.
The New York Times
Good to see a news executive realize that fighting back against the Trump administration’s attacks on the free press isn’t optional. “Rights are just ink on paper unless they’re exercised.”
TikTok, Instagram, Youtube: Plattformen schludern bei Hassrede und Accountsperren
Statt Durchsetzung von Völkerrecht: EU-Mittelmeermission IRINI dient künftig nur noch der Migrationsabwehr
Unsichere Billigimporte: EU-Kommission überzieht Temu mit einer satten Strafe
Message in a Bottle #10 – Declaration of Principals
The following was submitted by a Pirate supporter using the pseudonym “A. Pirate, MD.”; the Declaration of Independence, reborn as a Pirate Party battle cry against two-party rule. This article is apart of the project “Message in a Bottle”, allowing supporters of the US Pirate Party to submit editorial articles to the United States Pirate Party website.
“When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the Earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature’s God entitled them a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation” – Thomas Jefferson, Declaration of Independence, 1776
When asked where they stand on politics, 250 years later, many Americans respond succinctly, “I think we should just burn it all down and start over”. The same frustration experienced by the American colonies lives on in the modern day.
Several truths that Jefferson, paraphrasing Voltaire, thought to be “Self-Evident” were that “all men are created equal” and that “they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights. That among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”
These principles of equality, life, liberty and happiness still excite us and draw us toward hope. For 250 years we have strived for them and fought against them so violently that we could hardly claim any ownership of these virtues. We may only hold them up as goals yet unattained and renew our commitment to move in their direction.
Jefferson, as part of the committee of five, goes on to state that, “To secure these rights, governments are instituted among men-deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed”.
The Constitution of the United States sought to institute a representative government and to create a structure for obtaining the consent of the governed. This government has been altered over time by constitutional amendments and by acts and laws meant to “perfect” the union.
However, every change has been accompanied by more power lost by the people and gained by industry and factions.
The Declaration stated plainly, “That whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it and to institute new government”. It said clearly that its principles and structures should be those which seem most likely to effect the people’s safety and happiness. Jefferson went on to declare that “it is their right. It is their duty to throw off such government and to provide new guards for their future security”
Before enumerating the transgressions of the king who had so offended the colonists, the Congress identified six principles (equality, life, liberty, happiness, safety and security) upon which government should be founded.
The problem inherent in these principles is that they conflict with one another. Life is often in jeopardy when safety is threatened. Liberty frequently conflicts directly with security. And, equality contradicts individual pursuits of happiness.
The Committee of Five (Jefferson, Franklin, Adams, Livingston and Sherman), suggested prudence in deciding to alter “governments long established” and applauded the “patient sufferance” of the colonies. These qualities are necessary to endure the balance of conflicting priorities inherent in government.
But, “when a long train of abuses and usurpations” by the king tyrannized the colonists, they decided to act. The modern-day tyrant is a system of government completely beholden to industry and special interests which subverts the needs of citizens in the name of party.
Each party isolates and demonizes the other while representing a scant quarter of the actual voting public. Neither values the rights of the rest and our principles are compromised in the name of consolidating power and treasure.
Out of a “decent respect to the opinions of mankind” the founders listed the grievances which precipitated their separation from England. So, in Colonial terms, “let facts be submitted to a candid world”.
- Under two-party rule, the deficit has risen to more than $38 Trillion dollars and the people pay ever-more taxes to pay only the interest with no plan to repay the principle.
- The Federal Reserve continues to profit from deficit spending by both parties which enriches banks and bankers at the expense of the people.
- Each party gerrymanders the maps to consolidate power over the other party while failing to provide actual representation to the people. In this way, constituents are chosen by the parties and the people never get to choose their representatives.
- Private equity firms and foreign powers fund campaigns for both parties in exchange for favors. This amounts to sedition in that it undermines the integrity of our elections, Congress and executive branch and leaves each participant open to blackmail and manipulation. The appearance of corruption is everywhere.
- Their constant infighting deprives us of common-sense laws which protect and preserve our rights in favor of laws which further deny us our lives, liberty, and property to bolster and finance private industry.
- Congress has failed to check or to balance the over-reach of the executive branch in direct violation of our constitution.
- They have spent over $14 Trillion on the department of homeland security and the department of defense to fight wars which have not contributed greatly to our security while costing us lives and liberties for almost 25 years.
- During the same 25 years, they have spent $150 billion to maintain the largest prison population the world has ever known.
- The have violated the privacy of citizens en masse and without judicial oversight.
- They have failed to facilitate and legislate legal immigration and weaponized the enforcement of immigration policy to violate human and constitutional rights.
- They have weaponized our police forces against us in violation of our privacy, civil rights, and human rights.
- They have used force, coercion, and murder to deprive us of trial by jury.
- They have protected these officers by mock trials for the felonies and murders they have committed against us.
- They have corrupted the courts by way of political appointment and created political conflict between the executive and judicial branches.
- They have become rich by committing financial crimes through insider trading, taking bribes by way of campaign contributions, and accepting emoluments in exchange for selling out our security.
- They have manipulated free markets to our detriment for personal and political gain.
- They have protected criminal activity through pardons for convicted drug lords and wayward family members.
- They have facilitated the importation and distribution of poisonous chemicals among us under the guise of progress, control, trade, or science.
- They have imposed taxes on us without representation.
- They have created trade agreements which make us dependent on other nations and denied us trade relations more favorable to our security.
- They have refused to secure statehood and representation for Puerto Rico and Washington DC.
- They have deregulated corporate polluters in exchange for financial and political favors.
- They have failed to fully repair the damages suffered by our native populations during the genocide of the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries.
“In every stage of these oppressions, we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms: our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury”.
That line is directly from the Declaration. Their actions are the very definition of tyranny which is by the reckoning of the Second Continental Congress “unfit to rule a free people”.
We have told the Congress that we want honesty, transparency, equity, privacy, freedom, and liberty. We have begged them to legislate term limits, stop insider trading, reform campaign finance laws, and hold government accountable when our rights are violated.
We have asked for safety, security, and clear pathways to pursue happiness. We ask for low taxes and fair wages. Yet we are, again and again, met with frustration, aggression and suppression of our voices in favor of the two-parties.
We, therefore, as Pirates, declare ourselves independent of the two party system. We call for an Article V Convention of States to amend our Constitution and to reform our government to provide new guards for our security and to alter the system to one that may better effect our happiness.
What’s behind the EU’s digitalisation push? Surveillance, control and exclusion
The EU institutions have been engaged in a broad and wholesale digitalisation project but underneath the rhetoric of efficiency, modernisation, and citizen empowerment lies a more troubling reality. It is not a mere technical upgrade of public services, but a political choice, long in the making, to forego care and rights of individuals in favour of normalising surveillance, control and exclusion of the most marginalised. This blog explores the various facets of the EU’s digital welfare state push, and what it means for the relationship between people and the state.
The post What’s behind the EU’s digitalisation push? Surveillance, control and exclusion appeared first on European Digital Rights (EDRi).
A push back to Czech football club‘s plan to install facial recognition CCTV system
There is a debate in the Czech Republic over the use of facial recognition cameras in stadiums. Both clubs and politicians are calling for biometric surveillance after hundreds of fans stormed the football pitch during a recent match. The debate has unfolded with pushbacks from the public opinion and digital rights groups, including IuRe, while government officials are still considering the implementation of biometric system regardless of their illegality.
The post A push back to Czech football club‘s plan to install facial recognition CCTV system appeared first on European Digital Rights (EDRi).
Inside Italy’s low-cost spyware economy
Commercial spyware in Europe has recently made headlines with the now notorious names of Pegasus and Graphite, the expensive, exploitation-driven products at the top end of the market. Much less known is the wide underworld ecosystem of low-cost spyware vendors, often targeting citizens via their smartphones. EDRi member Osservatorio Nessuno has investigated and analysed two separate products, Spyrtacus and Morpheus.
The post Inside Italy’s low-cost spyware economy appeared first on European Digital Rights (EDRi).
EDRi-gram, 28 May 2026
What has the EDRi network been up to over the past few weeks? Find out the latest digital rights news in our bi-weekly newsletter. In this edition: May the force be with the digital rights community.
The post EDRi-gram, 28 May 2026 appeared first on European Digital Rights (EDRi).
Journalists slam proposed Paramount merger as threat to press freedom
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
A group of award-winning journalists and documentarians expressed strong opposition to the proposed merger between Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery during a press conference today, citing the threat the deal poses to journalism and American democracy.
Journalists Kara Swisher, Jim Acosta, and Katie Phang along with Emmy-winning documentary filmmakers Laura Poitras and Geeta Gandbhir spoke at the event, hosted by Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF), Democracy Defenders Fund, International Documentary Association, Future Film Coalition, and Free Press.
The 2026 News & Documentary Emmy Awards, which begin tonight, celebrate achievements that wouldn’t be possible without press freedom and editorial independence. But, as the speakers discussed, Paramount CEO David Ellison has a track record of throwing those fundamental American principles under the bus to curry favor with the Trump administration, harming the press, the public, and Paramount itself. Case in point, today news broke that Paramount-owned CBS News would not renew the contract of journalist Sharyn Alfonsi, who resisted censorship of her “60 Minutes” story on torture of Venezuelan migrants.
“I think what’s happening right now is pretty dangerous,” said Acosta. “To essentially announce the departure of Sharyn Alfonsi from 60 Minutes is a very in-your-face move by some people who don’t care very much about the First Amendment.” Acosta added, “Folks need to use a little bit of their imagination here to recognize what may be coming down the pike” with a “strange oligarchical empire … attempting to do state media.”
“There’s a feeling that the wall has come down between editorial independence and corporate interests,” said Swisher. “They’re not doing it for economics. The math doesn’t math. You think Elon Musk bought Twitter to make money? These people are rich beyond all possible wealth. You have to really be thinking about what’s the actual game here, and the actual game is influence, and to take corporate interests and align them with editorial.”
Phang added that in a world where the government dictates who owns the media, “editorial independence will be a thing of the past, and what you’ll have is no one capable of being able to hold power to account.”
“Consolidation of media is bad for the public, it’s bad for creators, it’s bad for the public’s right to know,” said Poitras, who also serves on FPF’s board of directors. “The government has always tried to silence and censor the press, and the job of the press and the journalist is to be adversarial to power … the interests of corporations are entirely different [from] what is good for the press,” which, she explained, leads to capitulation by conglomerates faced with government pressure.
Gandbhir highlighted an often-overlooked issue: The proposed merger’s impact on news archives. “Many of us documentary filmmakers depend on access to archives to make our films, and specifically, the CNN archive holds over 4 million assets, spanning 45-plus years of global news, wars, elections, and political events. And, the CBS archive adds to that years of network television programming. And folding these two massive archives, two of the four major U.S. news archives, under the control of one entity, who has shown themselves to be active in editorial suppression, is a grave threat to documentary filmmakers,” she explained.
FPF also released an open letter yesterday signed by over 200 current and former journalists, documentarians, journalism professors, and rights organizations. The letter elaborates on the dangers of allowing the administration to steer media companies to stooges and oligarchs who have shown a willingness to censor the news — and tank news companies — to further their own interests. Notable signers include Sam Donaldson, SE Cupp, and Mehdi Hasan, as well as Acosta, Phang, and Poitras, among many others. FPF plans to continue collecting signatures.
FPF Chief of Advocacy Seth Stern said: “The First Amendment assumes that the government will attempt to silence the press, but the First Amendment also assumes that the press won’t voluntarily agree, won’t go down without a fight.” He added that “news outlets have a constitutional right to report from whichever perspective they see fit, but presidents don’t have a right to abuse their offices to shape those decisions, and executives like Ellison who are willing to let them do so need to stay out of the news business and find some other widget to sell.”
Please contact us if you would like further comment or a copy of the transcript and/or video of the press conference.
Unsealing of failed Don Lemon and Georgia Fort warrants exposes attack on press
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
New York, May 27, 2026 — A federal judge twice rejected search warrant applications for the YouTube accounts of journalists Don Lemon and Georgia Fort, according to court records unsealed yesterday. Federal prosecutors sought the search warrants in connection with the spurious criminal cases they’re pursuing against Lemon and Fort for covering a protest at a church in St. Paul, Minnesota. A third journalist, photographer Junn Bollmann, is also facing baseless charges.
Magistrate Judge John Docherty rejected the initial warrants — which sought information about Lemon and Fort’s use of their YouTube channels as well as information about the people who may have watched them — because they lacked probable cause, a basic legal requirement for all search warrants.
Docherty then refused to sign the resubmitted search warrants because they failed to comply with the requirements of the Privacy Protection Act of 1980, a federal law that prohibits most search warrants targeting journalists and others who disseminate information to the public. The government later withdrew the search warrants, and Docherty ordered them unsealed.
The following statement can be attributed to Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF) Senior Advocacy Adviser Caitlin Vogus:
“These failed search warrants are what happens when incompetent prosecutors pursue political vendettas instead of justice. Having or watching a YouTube channel aren’t crimes, and neither is reporting on a protest. Before the Department of Justice embarrasses itself even more, it should immediately drop the prosecutions of Don Lemon, Georgia Fort, and Junn Bollmann.“Once again, the DOJ also conveniently left out of its applications any mention of the Privacy Protection Act of 1980 and later wrongly insisted that prosecutors don’t need to tell judges when the warrants the government seeks may violate federal law. At this point, every judge should assume the DOJ will try to sneak illegal search warrants past the court. Congress should pass the Privacy Protection Updates Act before this abuse gets even worse.
“Secrecy around search warrants can be dangerous. These applications only became public because the government failed so badly, and Judge John Docherty properly recognized the public’s right to see them. Given the DOJ’s repeated attacks on First Amendment rights and flagrant abuse of the legal system, journalists and all Americans should be asking what’s still buried in sealed search warrant applications around the country.”
Please contact us if you would like further comment.
Tiere und künstliche Intelligenz: Wie die KI in unser Hackfleisch kommt
@politics
europeanpirates.eu/bouncers-at…
“Prove that you are a human,” or “Click on all the images of cars”. Familiar phrases like these have been part of
Bouncers at the Digital Border: How Google’s reCAPTCHA Overhaul Fractures the Free Internet
“Prove that you are a human,” or “Click on all the images of cars”. Familiar phrases like these have been part of everyday internet life for a long time. Using these reCAPTCHA tools, Google has long acted as a digital gatekeeper, ensuring that the fingers on the device are those of a genuine human and keeping malicious bots at bay. Now, Google’s platform is undergoing a transition phase.
Google has made major changes to its widely used security tool, reCAPTCHA. What used to be a simple web widget is now fully part of the Google Cloud Platform (GCP) ecosystem.
While corporate narratives tout this step as necessary progress in cybersecurity, developers of privacy-focused Android systems, civil society organizations, and digital rights & privacy advocates such as the European Pirates and European Digital Rights (EDRi) see a far more alarming reality. This marks a shift in the fundamental architecture of web access, introducing systemic legal changes, economic gatekeeping, and technological exclusion.
At the center of this transformation lies a larger global shift driven by artificial intelligence. As AI systems become increasingly capable of mimicking human behavior online, corporations are restructuring how trust, access, and verification operate across the internet. Critics argue that the result is an internet where participation increasingly depends on compliance with opaque corporate ecosystems rather than open standards.
The rules for how reCAPTCHA works have been completely changed, taking control away from regular website owners and users.
- Mandatory Cloud Integration & Billing: Google has ended support for all old “Classic” reCAPTCHA accounts on Google Cloud Platform. To continue using reCAPTCHA, website owners must migrate to the Google Cloud Platform. Even though there is still a free option for smaller sites, one has to link a valid credit card or billing account to activate it.
- The Legal Liability Loophole: Under the proposed changes, Google’s role shifts from a “data controller” to a “data processor,” with the entire onus of user tracking placed on individual website operators.
- Device Attestation Locks: The security system is now closely tied to Google Play Services on Android. Devices that use alternative, uncertified, or privacy-focused operating systems (like custom ROMs) will not pass background checks and will be blocked from accessing protected websites.
To fully dissect the issue, one must understand the justification driving Google’s infrastructure overhaul.
- Combating Advanced Botnets: Automated scripts and bots have become increasingly sophisticated. Many now use artificial intelligence to get past old text or image puzzles.
- Enterprise Security Scaling: By making reCAPTCHA part of Google Cloud’s broader Fraud Defense tools, Google provides large companies with analytics that can help stop large, organized fraud attacks.
- Data Ownership Framing: From Google’s perspective, handing over complete control of data to website operators grants businesses ultimate authority and governance over how their visitors’ security telemetry is compiled and managed.
Amidst a flurry of such proposals circulating every second day aimed at changing the face of internet operations, it is important to note that AI has changed the scale of online automations. The aforementioned change by Google marks a shift from simple spam filters to large-scale behavioral surveillance systems that continuously evaluate “trustworthiness” in the background.
The question is: will this change to the definition of “trusted user,” based on a behavioral algorithm, keep the internet accessible and safe for everyone?
Civil society groups argue that Google’s explanation hides a bigger problem: the web is becoming more controlled by a few companies, and people are losing digital independence.
- The Subversion of GDPR Spirit
By calling itself just a “processor,” Google puts the financial and legal risks on small businesses, open-source projects, and independent blogs. Website owners cannot check or control the hidden algorithms Google adds to their sites. Google benefits from user tracking to improve fraud detection, but regular web creators face legal problems if anything goes wrong.
- Financial Identity Wall
Making people verify with a credit card to use basic web protection shuts some people out. Small creators, activist groups, and student developers have to give their financial information to a big tech company just to keep their sites safe from spam. This puts a barrier around the open web.
- Algorithmic Discrimination against Privacy Users
With more “invisible” tracking, users can only access sites if they agree to be tracked. If someone uses privacy tools such as a VPN, tracking blockers, or a privacy-focused phone system like GrapheneOS, Google’s checks may flag them as suspicious. Real people are treated like threats just because they want privacy. This is especially unfair to journalists, whistleblowers, and privacy advocates who need special tools to stay safe.
- Monopoly is the Motive
Many privacy-focused Android developers are concerned about the drastic economic impact that Google’s reCAPTCHA system update is set to bring about on millions of small websites. Brendon Eich, CEO of Brave Browser, expressed concern, stating that Google’s security concern is unfounded. The core idea is to maintain a monopoly through Google Mobile Services (GMS) licensing. The GrapheneOS team shares a similar view – the requirements set by Google and Apple services are more anti-competitive than security-focused.
Web security must not become a source of corporate tax. Individuals shouldn’t be made to compromise their financial identities or choose between web access and device autonomy. As Google hardens the borders of its proprietary cloud ecosystem, the need for decentralized, transparent, and privacy-respecting verification methods becomes a pressing structural necessity for a democratic internet.
Those seeking to challenge corporate gatekeeping and advocate for a transparent digital future will have an opportunity to join the discussion at the Think Twice Conference (TT5), hosted by the Pirate Parties International and the European Pirates.
This year’s conference theme focuses directly on AI & Governance: Opportunities and Risks for Digital Freedom, bringing together developers, activists, policymakers, and civil society groups to debate how automated systems can remain transparent, accountable, and aligned with human rights principles.
The official Call for Speakers is currently open for individual talks and panel roundtables.
The registration deadline for speaker applications is June 1, 2026.
As debates over AI, surveillance, and platform control intensify, events like TT5 are becoming increasingly important spaces for defending the future of a democratic and open internet.
Digital Rights Monthly Socials
Connect with the global digital rights community at the monthly Digital Rights Social, hosted by Team CommUNITY on their virtual Mattermost platform
The post Digital Rights Monthly Socials appeared first on European Digital Rights (EDRi).
DRAPAC26 – Digital Rights Asia-Pacific Assembly
The 2026 Digital Rights Asia-Pacific Assembly (DRAPAC26) brings together changemakers from across the region working at the intersection of digital rights, human rights, and technology.
The post DRAPAC26 – Digital Rights Asia-Pacific Assembly appeared first on European Digital Rights (EDRi).
Resistance Lab: Making and distributing media under surveillance
Join Interrupting Criminalization's Abolition Journalism Fellow Lewis Raven Wallace, digital security firm Safety Sync Group, and fellow journalists and media makers for a resistance lab.
The post Resistance Lab: Making and distributing media under surveillance appeared first on European Digital Rights (EDRi).
Für 250 Millionen Euro: Bund schafft neue Abhängigkeiten von IT-Konzernen
Per i cittadini non c'è più scampo le grandi piattaforme digitali “non ci sono più scuse”. Parola di Ursula von der Leyen, che annuncia il nuovo sistema europeo per la verifica dell’età degli utenti online
Gli hackerspace sono spazi fisici gestiti dalla comunità, dove le persone possono incontrarsi e lavorare ai propri progetti. Ecco la mappa di quelli italiani!
hackerspaces.org è una Wiki dedicata a chiunque desideri condividere le proprie esperienze e domande relative agli hackerspace con la comunità globale degli hackerspace.
Costruire! Unire! Moltiplicare!!- Le nuove leggi statunitensi ideate per la sicurezza dei minori online stanno costringendo milioni di americani adulti a sottoporsi a controlli obbligatori per la verifica dell’età, che spesso utilizzano la tecnologia dell’intelligenza artificiale, e stanno creando notevoli grattacapi alle aziende di social media che cercano di trovare un equilibrio tra conformità legale e privacy per gli utenti.
- Circa la metà degli stati degli Stati Uniti ha promulgato o sta promuovendo leggi che impongono alle piattaforme, tra cui siti di contenuti per adulti, servizi di gioco online e app di social media, di bloccare gli utenti minorenni.
- Grandi volumi di dati sensibili sull’identità possono diventare bersagli per le richieste del governo e degli hacker. Ma a un livello più profondo, la sorveglianza colpisce le fondamenta di un Internet libero e aperto, affermano i sostenitori delle libertà civili, e la scorsa settimana una sentenza del tribunale della Virginia, citando il Primo Emendamento, ha confermato la decisione.
The Pirate Academy combines digital workshops and classes with an individual group excursion and simulation of a legislative negotiation, inside the European Parliament in Brussels. The course is focused on European policy, specifically on trade and security. Participants will also learn about the core principles and political goals of the European Pirates. The European Pirate Academy is open to all participants regardless of political affiliation.
The admission process will take place in two rounds. The first round will be open from 15.2. to 6.3.. The second round will be held in the first weeks of March.