@mayaisloading@beige.party

@mayaisloading@beige.party · Feb 05, 2025

Replying to @ilookloud@retro.pizza

@ilookloud@retro.pizza Thank you for the "agree to disagree" aproach. Just wahted to clear I'm not against a public outcry here, it's needed, I just disagree with the way it's done.

0

Mᴀʏᴀ

@mayaisloading@beige.party · Feb 04, 2025

Replying to @dimpase@mathstodon.xyz

@dimpase@mathstodon.xyz What about Canada tho (I'm just asking, I have no knowledge about the logistics of moving there)?

0

1

0

Mᴀʏᴀ

@mayaisloading@beige.party · Feb 04, 2025

Replying to @ilookloud@retro.pizza

@ilookloud@retro.pizza I don't know (not think, I'm not gonna pretend I can see what they think) if they understand what they are doing is wrong. Honestly, I don't even know if they have thought about checking the legality but even if they have, I'm not gonna assume they are acting with malice. The ones to know both the legality, morality and logistics are the ones elected and presumably "knowledgeable" of politics, finances and logistics. There's noting good coming out of assuming what's in people mind. And it's pretty bold to assume with such certainty a bunch of fresh from college teck guys know shit about running the country.

0

1

0

Mᴀʏᴀ

@mayaisloading@beige.party · Feb 04, 2025

Replying to @dimpase@mathstodon.xyz

@dimpase@mathstodon.xyz I might misunderstand what that visa means but I can't imagine living my home country for a country I feel is in need of revolution.

0

1

0

Mᴀʏᴀ

@mayaisloading@beige.party · Feb 04, 2025

Replying to @dimpase@mathstodon.xyz

@dimpase@mathstodon.xyz @jaxroam@mastodon.social @mwguy@infosec.exchange @molly0xfff@hachyderm.io Well, guess what, republicans kinda of tried it 4 years ago and failed miserably. Why? Because they significantly overestimated the number of people willing to do it. We get to the same point you need enough number of people in your corner.

0

1

0

Mᴀʏᴀ

@mayaisloading@beige.party · Feb 04, 2025

Replying to @dimpase@mathstodon.xyz

@dimpase@mathstodon.xyz @jaxroam@mastodon.social @mwguy@infosec.exchange @molly0xfff@hachyderm.io Crimes only matter if significant enough portion of the people understand they are crimes. Work on increasing this, the rest is counter productive. If tomorrow more than half of the world decides murder is not a crime, you can scream the names of murderers to your less than half of the world echo chamber all you want and you will achieve nothing. Trying to shut my points with technicality is precisely why this has even been allowed to happen in November. Because instead of a welcoming open conversation, the liberals are crying "nazis" in the liberals echo chembers and basically change the opinion to no one. Then when the vote was clear, it was such a surprise because one could have never guessed it from the highly liberal echo chamber. And it's very unfortunate turn of events. But yeah, by any means, continue doing the same mistake over and over again.

0

1

0

Mᴀʏᴀ

@mayaisloading@beige.party · Feb 04, 2025

Replying to @mwguy@infosec.exchange

@mwguy@infosec.exchange @jaxroam@mastodon.social @molly0xfff@hachyderm.io You need enough people to belive it's a crime to punish anyone and at the moment you don't as it was shown in November, so I don't see how this would result it a success at this moment.

0

Mᴀʏᴀ

@mayaisloading@beige.party · Feb 04, 2025

Replying to @jaxroam@mastodon.social

@jaxroam@mastodon.social @mwguy@infosec.exchange @molly0xfff@hachyderm.io Sure, that strategy will work as well as it worked preventing the problem in November.

0

1

0

Mᴀʏᴀ

@mayaisloading@beige.party · Feb 04, 2025

Replying to @sheislaurence@mastodon.social

@sheislaurence@mastodon.social @toriver@mas.to @molly0xfff@hachyderm.io I would say, keep a known database with government figures that everyone could access if they want to, don't just flash them to a social media angry crowd that has a good amount of toxic individual in any side of the molitical spectrum, focus on the ones enabling the actions, rather than the ones doing the "diry work" because without being enabled it wouldn't have happend and also strongly focus on the action itself and why it is the wrong choice not in a "us vs them" manner but in a more open conversation manner so it could actually get to much more people and not just the once who already know it's wrong and a problem. That's my 2 cents, that's how I would try tackling a similar situation. It's not perfect but I believe it's at least a tiny bit more effective than mockery and silent intimidation to a handful of collage kids.

0

Mᴀʏᴀ

@mayaisloading@beige.party · Feb 03, 2025

Replying to @jimbob@aus.social

@jimbob@aus.social @mwguy@infosec.exchange @molly0xfff@hachyderm.io In Bulgaria we had a very nasty anty LGBTQ law managed to pass in schools and there are a list of teachers signing a petition against it. The petition and the names are technically public. The farthest right wing party posted a "black-list" of those teachers to their far right audience and excused themselves saying it's public information. It was a mess. Do you see now why technicality means nothing in these situations? Wrong is wrong, morally wrong. Is it technically a crime as per Musky suggestion - probably not but still not a move I can support.

0

1

0

Mᴀʏᴀ

@mayaisloading@beige.party · Feb 03, 2025

Replying to @mwguy@infosec.exchange

@mwguy@infosec.exchange @molly0xfff@hachyderm.io They are workers. They are not the decisions makers (in my understanding). They are stupid college kids ffs, they are working for an asshole but they are not the actual issue here.

0

7

0

Mᴀʏᴀ

@mayaisloading@beige.party · Feb 03, 2025

Replying to @toriver@mas.to

@toriver@mas.to @molly0xfff@hachyderm.io That's not the way. Doing good the wrong way makes you bridge into territories we're trying to fight against.

0

2

0

Mᴀʏᴀ

@mayaisloading@beige.party · Feb 03, 2025

Replying to @molly0xfff@hachyderm.io

@molly0xfff@hachyderm.io Honesty, both are wrong. Naming private individuals publicly is just as wrong as giving access to someone like Muck. The ones who have to be hold accountable are the once agreeing to it in the first place. All of this is giving me the ick. Edit ot add: In Bulgaria we had a very nasty anty LGBTQ law managed to pass in schools and there are a list of teachers signing a petition against it. The petition and the names are technically public. The farthest right wing party posted a "black-list" of those teachers to their far right audience and excused themselves saying it's public information. There was harassment, there were dead threats. It was a mess. Do you see now why technicality means nothing in these situations? Wrong is wrong, morally wrong. Is it technically a crime as per Musky suggestion - probably not but still not a move I can support. Second edit: I'm absolutely not against information being public as I wasn't against the petition being public. But it's one thing having it avaliable to whoever decides to purposely look for it and a whole other thing to post it as a sort of black-list to an angry crowd on the other side of the political spectrum as some sort of silent punishment -esque move.

0

6

2

0

Mᴀʏᴀ

@mayaisloading@beige.party · Mar 22, 2024

Fentasy is where a 3000 years old dude is made to look sexy;
Sci-fi is where a pile of bolts and nuts is made to look sexy;
Horror is where a walking corpse is made to look sexy;
Romance is where a toxic ass stalker is made to look sexy

196

5

99

0

Mᴀʏᴀ

@mayaisloading@beige.party · Mar 29, 2023

Before Internet I have never thought I would ever say no to cookies.

149

14

79

0

Mᴀʏᴀ

Posts

Remote instance