Marvin R

@agiletortoise@mastodon.social I still have a 2016 MacBook Pro sometimes in use, it is stuck on macOS 12 and I am kind of surprised how many apps already ended support for it.

@ariaflame @claesdevreese Q was: Why does this Danish news org frame the progress with renewables this way? Why is solar + wind being larger than fossil significant, when renewable overall are *much* larger than fossil. Your theory: Because hydro storage might contain non-renewable electricity. After some research, my likely answer: Danish news likes this view, because Denmark has the largest solar + wind percentage in the EU. (But not the highest percentage of renewables over all)

@ariaflame @claesdevreese Yeah no, I don't think that pump storage has anything to do with it. I found a second Danish newsarticle, that explains why they like this "solar + wind" framing: "Denmark occupies its place as the EU country with the highest share of solar and wind energy in the entire EU - 71 percent."(https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/viden/klima/se-eu-landenes-energirekorder-danmark-bedst-paa-sol-og-vind)

@ariaflame @claesdevreese I see around 10% of hydro might be from pump storage. Wouldn't logically almost all the energy stored in a pump storage come from wind and solar?

@claesdevreese is the framing here a little odd? I only read the auto-translation, why do they treat hydro-electric and other renewables differently? Sounds like the big milestone might be 2026 if 50% EU wide electricity comes from renewable sources(currently 49%)