In reply to
Marvin R
@marv51@mastodon.social
mastodon.social
@ariaflame @claesdevreese
Q was: Why does this Danish news org frame the progress with renewables this way? Why is solar + wind being larger than fossil significant, when renewable overall are *much* larger than fossil.
Your theory: Because hydro storage might contain non-renewable electricity.
After some research, my likely answer:
Danish news likes this view, because Denmark has the largest solar + wind percentage in the EU. (But not the highest percentage of renewables over all)
View full thread on mastodon.social
0
2
0
Conversation (2)
Showing 0 of 2 cached locally.
Syncing comments from the remote thread. 2 more replies are still loading.
Loading comments...