@Hey_Beth@sfba.social I was 13. I couldn't believe what I was seeing.
Remote
0
Followers
0
Following
17
Posts
Joined December 16, 2022
Posts
Open post
@Hey_Beth@sfba.social The '72 Men's Basketball Final. Kornelia Ender beating Shirley Babashoff. Scoring in figure skating and gymnastics. Everything about Avery Brundage. The East Bloc pro athletes. The Olympics have a proud legacy of hypocrisy. Still... Emil Zatopek!!!!
1
0
0
0
Open post
Open post
@kims@mas.to It was "her turn." Too bad the Dems didn't nominate someone who could beat Trump.
0
0
0
0
Open post
@GossiTheDog@cyberplace.social is that a real person? Usually, doctors are easy to find online.
3
2
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@ticho@mas.to
0
0
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@upstreamism@theatl.social
@upstreamism@theatl.social Not so sure about the "require" a warrant bit.
0
0
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@Shahin@mast.hpc.social
@Shahin@mast.hpc.social @tristansnell@mstdn.social Reading about the fire eaters and John C. Calhoun is a good start. The South Carolina fire eaters were a crazy irrational violent bunch of interesting assholes.
1
0
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@Shahin@mast.hpc.social
@Shahin@mast.hpc.social @tristansnell@mstdn.social Hard question to frame. What prompted individual legislators to vote for succession? What prompted individual citizens to kill and die for the state? I think slavery inseparably permeated every reason, no matter how you frame the question. Take the non slave holding farmer who went to war because of local sociopolitical pressure. Saying he went to war solely because of slavery is simplistic. But if you take slavery out of the mix, that farmer would never have gone to war.
1
0
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@McPatrick@zirk.us
@McPatrick@zirk.us @tristansnell@mstdn.social No umbrage here. I'm a Unionist through and through. Sole causation arguments, thouhh...lol.
0
0
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@McPatrick@zirk.us
@McPatrick@zirk.us @tristansnell@mstdn.social They didn't plead. They went to war and killed people. War is ALWAYS about power--not the form of pleading. There's a sole causation argument I can defend. That power, of course, depended upon human slavery.
0
0
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@McPatrick@zirk.us
@McPatrick@zirk.us @tristansnell@mstdn.social Because I don't agree with you that slavery was the sole, absolute, and complete cause of the Civil War--and in spite of the undisputed fact that the Civil War never would have happened without the fight over slavery--and in spite of the undisputed fact that slavery was by far the "runaway" most significant cause of the Civil War, I am somehow defending the racists who use insignificant lesser causes of the Civil War to defend racist oppression?
0
0
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@McPatrick@zirk.us
@McPatrick@zirk.us @tristansnell@mstdn.social The foundation of any effective propaganda is a kernel of truth. You note one such kernel. The other was the South's continually decreasing power in the face of the industrially predominant expanding North. The Southern power elites really didn't like that shit--this was a major factor which had a somewhat plausible non-slavery component (but an overwhelmingly predominant slavery component).
0
5
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@tristansnell@mstdn.social
@tristansnell@mstdn.social It was obviously the runaway but-for cause. But it wasn't the only cause.
0
10
0
0
Open post
Open post
Replying to
@annecollier@mastodon.world
@annecollier Troubling that many of these proposed "child" protection laws require adults to provide personal information before engaging in constitutionally protected speech.
1
2
0
0
Remote instance
mastodon.world
Open on original server