Remote
0
Followers
0
Following
9
Posts
Joined March 26, 2026
Posts
Open post
Replying to
@cubeos@hachyderm.io
@cubeos@hachyderm.io
You aren't citing what you're talking about. I can't discuss texts I haven't read and/or don't remember. Feel free.
0
0
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@cubeos@hachyderm.io
@cubeos@hachyderm.io
Half of the world's culture is _not_ pornography.
It might not, or it might, depends on the people's choice.
0
1
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@cubeos@hachyderm.io
@cubeos@hachyderm.io
Probably something in the lines of:
"The explicit literary, audio, or visual depiction of sexual subject matter - for sexual arousal and/or gratification."
0
1
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@footrest@mastodon.social
@cubeos@hachyderm.io
Maybe one of my contributions was considered for this document. 🙂
0
0
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@cubeos@hachyderm.io
@cubeos@hachyderm.io
I don't advocate for a technical solution. I advocate for a legal one - of making pornography illegal.
0
2
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@clickhere@mastodon.ie
@clickhere@mastodon.ie @EUCommission@ec.social-network.europa.eu
I agree. It needs a closing. IMHO, VPNs should be always allowed, while pornographic content should be prohibited. Hence, all VPNs would need to do to continue operating is blocking pornographic content. Please notice the footnote: "The content of the document is the sole responsibility of its author(s) and any opinions expressed herein should not be taken
to represent an official position of the Parliament."
0
0
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@cubeos@hachyderm.io
@cubeos@hachyderm.io
I agree. It needs a closing - but most likely not the way you are thinking of. IMHO, VPNs should be always allowed, while pornographic content should be prohibited. Hence, all VPNs would need to do to continue operating is blocking pornographic content.
0
1
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@AngelicAura@transfem.social
@AngelicAura@transfem.social
Fact-checking this news-piece, Claude says:
"## Bottom line
Not fake news. The factual scaffolding — the Handelsblatt reporting, the open letter, the Parliament resolution, the underlying DMA proceedings — is all real and well-sourced. But you're reading an advocacy organisation's interpretation of leaked reporting that the Commission hasn't officially confirmed. For a more neutral take, the original Handelsblatt article or the Heise coverage would be better starting points."
0
0
0
0
Remote instance
mastodon.social
Open on original server