mastodon
4.6.6
A thirst for a future worth living in.
(Replies over 500 characters are auto-muted)
A thirst for a future worth living in. (Replies over 500 characters are auto-muted)
A thirst for a future worth living in. (Replies over 500 characters are auto-muted)
A thirst for a future worth living in. (Replies over 500 characters are auto-muted)
A thirst for a future worth living in. (Replies over 500 characters are auto-muted)
A thirst for a future worth living in. (Replies over 500 characters are auto-muted)
A fascinating artifact of the NFT bubble is using it to measure organizational product velocity
That is, seeing how much latency exists between identification of a trend and actually shipping something responsive to that trend
In this case, we're seeing a legacy auto manufacturer ship NFT support (lol) at the same moment Twitter has discontinued their take on the trend
Talk about stranded assets
A thirst for a future worth living in. (Replies over 500 characters are auto-muted)
A thirst for a future worth living in. (Replies over 500 characters are auto-muted)
A thirst for a future worth living in. (Replies over 500 characters are auto-muted)
A thirst for a future worth living in. (Replies over 500 characters are auto-muted)
A thirst for a future worth living in. (Replies over 500 characters are auto-muted)
A thirst for a future worth living in. (Replies over 500 characters are auto-muted)
A thirst for a future worth living in. (Replies over 500 characters are auto-muted)
It's telling to me that the Fediverse—which provides all the self-governance of a DAO, and all the decentralization of web3—has no interest from the VC bootlicker class.
It reveals a lot about how a plausible technological benefit evolves into a grift. web3 nonsense was never about new paradigms. It was about constructing bags and conscripting bag holders. The proof is right here. Those guys are now chasing AI, instead of viable expressions of the goals they claimed to be so invested in.