SmoothOperator

It’s not kind for sure, completely agree. My point was more that even if it’s unkind, it’s not necessarily racism or bioessentialism. I think we must be kind to individuals, but still acknowledge problems with groups. That does require a shift in mindset to not feel personally impacted by statements about a group you belong to, which is easier said than done.

As I’m clearly in the wrong according to downvotes, could you elaborate on what I’m missing?

Half-asleep-sex can be amazing, there are different kinds of pleasure when you're only half conscious.

One could understand “men are trash” as having the meaning “every single man is trash”, which would be in line with racism as you say. Or one could understand it as “the group overall is trash”, meaning any individual member isn’t necessarily trash. The latter meaning is in some senses a matter of data - men are extremely overrepresented in e.g. violent crimes. Which, again, doesn’t much about the individual man.

The difference is that 10 years ago you needed billions of stable qubits, now you need 10k stable qubits. And 10 years ago you had one or two stable qubits in the lab, now you have thousands.

Helt fair, det er også sådan det siges jo. Og jeg tror måske også det efterhånden er blevet sådan man skriver det :)

Like a pokeball?

Unclear, hence all these people going around asking "what is a woman"

To be fair, it’s way better than 50/50, but of course no guarantees still.