Remote
0
Followers
0
Following
30
Posts
Joined September 02, 2025
Posts
Open post
Replying to
@chatcontrol@mastodon.social
@chatcontrol @echo_pbreyer Already sent and prepared emails for tomorrow. It's the audacity that irks me. Quite literally, what stops us from coming forward and saying, the next day also, "Actually no! I want another re-vote too!" Like, my god..
5
2
2
0
Open post
Replying to
@chatcontrol@mastodon.social
@chatcontrol @echo_pbreyer So let me see if I understood: Parlament voted No. LIBE voted No. And then the re vote is marked with 9 days until the expiration date.
If this one comes out as a (hopefully not) 'Yes' to mass scanning - then what? It's 2 No's to 1 yes. Then what? Is it accepted, gone through with that answer? Is it marinated in nothing? More votes?
Does the two other no's mean absolutely nothing to the point they can just demand another vote? Surely, this is not democratic?
17
2
10
0
Open post
Replying to
@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social
@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social LETS GOO GOOD JOB EVERYONE!!
0
0
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@chatcontrol@mastodon.social
@chatcontrol@mastodon.social Thank you Joachim and Patrick. Will help with this once more!
2
0
1
0
Open post
Open post
Open post
Replying to
@chatcontrol@mastodon.social
@chatcontrol Gods, the citizens are truly worth nothing. I am worth nothing, it seems.
6
0
4
0
Open post
Replying to
@chatcontrol@mastodon.social
@chatcontrol Okay so The Privacy fundamental right is just a sentence is a pretty piece of paper.
9
0
1
0
Open post
Open post
Replying to
@stooovie@mas.to
@stooovie@mas.to @qbe@chaos.social @ondra@social.unextro.net Patrick even spoke about Minecraft ! MINECRAFT! One thing you could argue is roblox and even then I don't agree with full on age verification on EVERYTHING (besides the ones under the age of 13, 13 year Olds won't be able to access app store to those apps. The same for 16 year Olds for 16 year Olds. Imagine a 16 year old not be able to use the school whatssap group.. or the family group..)
0
0
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@stooovie@mas.to
@stooovie@mas.to @qbe@chaos.social @ondra@social.unextro.net In addition, It's not just encryption we are fighting against. Also mandated Age verification in apps, ALL apps and websites. Even if they don't even get contact with people, those can get blocked. I do not want to send my credit card to watch cat videos on Instagram to a random company. Anonymity is over too if it passes - a right to privacy. And needless to say people will loose access to apps under the age. Like 16 to whatssap, messager and all chatting apps like that.
+
2
0
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@Null03@mastodon.social
and Article 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms; Johannesburg Principles on National Security, Free Expression and Access to Information, Camden Principles on Freedom of Expression and Equality.
The Right to Privacy
in Denmark Submitted by Privacy International and IT-Political
Association of Denmark. (Pdf)
3
0
1
0
Open post
Replying to
@Null03@mastodon.social
- Article 11 of the American Convention on Human Rights, Article 4 of the African Union Principles on Freedom of Expression, Article 5 of the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man, Article 21 of the Arab Charter on Human Rights.
2
1
1
0
Open post
Replying to
@chatcontrol@mastodon.social
@chatcontrol@mastodon.social ahem,
Universal Declaration of Human Rights Article 12, United Nations Convention on Migrant Workers Article 14, UN
Convention of the Protection of the Child Article 16, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Article 17; regional conventions including Article 10 of the
African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child.
4
1
4
0
Open post
Replying to
@chatcontrol@mastodon.social
@chatcontrol@mastodon.social Fellas, is it erroneous to want PRIVACY? And must I remind you, oh so grand danish minister of justice and chief architect of the current Chat control proposal, Peter Hummelgaard, that PRIVACY is a human right?
This is laughable at worst. In some days, racism will also be debatable, it seems. What the fuck is going on.
29
0
8
0
Open post
Replying to
@Kurosetii@mastodon.social
@Kurosetii@mastodon.social @chatcontrol@mastodon.social you're welcome friend !
1
0
1
0
Open post
Replying to
@Kurosetii@mastodon.social
@Kurosetii@mastodon.social @chatcontrol@mastodon.social It's all a matter of waiting for the rest to publicly reply. To be fair, I've given up trying to change the minds of those already in favor. There's no point. Send to the undecided and the unknown MEPS.
1
1
1
0
Open post
Replying to
@Kurosetii@mastodon.social
@Kurosetii@mastodon.social @chatcontrol@mastodon.social Here's another one.
" —[...] Chat monitoring seems excessive. We wouldn't open every letter, violating the confidentiality of correspondence, and would instead search them for AI to identify criminals."
0
0
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@Kurosetii@mastodon.social
@Kurosetii@mastodon.social @chatcontrol@mastodon.social A part from an email from Fabio De Masi,
"— [...] Comprehensive and indiscriminate surveillance methods, such as the widespread search of private messages, are highly problematic. They pose significant risks to misuse, press freedom, and the protection of confidential communications.[...]"
0
1
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@Kurosetii@mastodon.social
@Kurosetii@mastodon.social @chatcontrol@mastodon.social I sent an exert here. Let me find it.
1
0
1
0
Open post
Replying to
@Kurosetii@mastodon.social
@Kurosetii@mastodon.social someone said here that estonia likes to follow finland's steps. Hopefully we have them too ! 🙏
1
1
1
0
Open post
Replying to
@Kurosetii@mastodon.social
@Kurosetii@mastodon.social We are currently at 22% and they are around 55% with 15 countries. They need above 65% for the law to even be consider to pass because it also matters the MEPS voting. Malta's government is in favor of the law yet all MEPS are against. I have hope that this won't go through. Let's hope for Germany and Estonia to be on our side.
0
1
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@Kurosetii@mastodon.social
@Kurosetii@mastodon.social @chatcontrol@mastodon.social In addition, a ex-politician from my country was advocating for the population to send emails to our government and MEPS. It's gotten to a point where they're so full of them to answer. I've seen another creator on Instagram promote this website and a lot of people are too sending messages against.
0
0
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@Kurosetii@mastodon.social
@Kurosetii@mastodon.social @chatcontrol@mastodon.social well, I had sent some replies here. France spoke to me, the Verts/ALE are against. And fabio de Masi is also against. FPÖ are also against, recieved it from Petra Steger. Haven't received anything more yet.
Have you gotten anything?
1
2
1
0
Open post
Replying to
@chatcontrol@mastodon.social
@chatcontrol@mastodon.social Please update the website whenever you can ! 🙏
0
1
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@Null03@mastodon.social
@chatcontrol@mastodon.social
— [...] "Online privacy and the challenges posed for our democracies and fundamental rights are largely unknown to the general public. I am therefore particularly grateful to you for being a vigilant citizen. We are counting on your mobilization to raise awareness and increase citizen opposition to mass surveillance. Please feel free to spread the word and encourage your friends and family to write to their representatives at national level as well."
Keep the mails to your MEPS.
1
0
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@Null03@mastodon.social
@chatcontrol@mastodon.social
From Saskia BRICMONT,
— [...] "In general, the Greens/EFA in the European Parliament are at the forefront of the fight against mass surveillance. For example, we have a campaign against biometric surveillance in public spaces, which is often touted by its supporters as a tool to combat child disappearances, but without measuring the impact on societal change that this induces." [...]
Part 3.
0
1
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@Null03@mastodon.social
@chatcontrol@mastodon.social
A part from an email from Fabio De Masi,
"— [...] Comprehensive and indiscriminate surveillance methods, such as the widespread search of private messages, are highly problematic. They pose significant risks to misuse, press freedom, and the protection of confidential communications.[...]"
Part.2
0
1
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@chatcontrol@mastodon.social
@chatcontrol@mastodon.social hi. I got more parties / MEPS against it with parts of emails as proof as I can not put everything here.
"The FPÖ will resolutely oppose chat control, censorship and any form of state surveillance fantasy, both in the EU and at national level." From Petra Steger.
Part. 1
0
1
0
0
Remote instance
mastodon.social
Open on original server