Post #969952
2026-04-06 00:40 UTC
Replies (7)
-
@mHtt@mastodon.social 2026-04-06 02:40
@Okanogen@mastodon.social Reduce, Re-Use, Recycle, in that order.
-
@Arapalla@aus.social 2026-04-06 03:00
@Okanogen@mastodon.social And now you know why they're fighting so hard to stop it.
-
@Nigel_Purchase@mstdn.social 2026-04-06 03:10
@Okanogen@mastodon.social Nor will there be any more wars to get ME oil.
-
@RedHyppo@mastodon.green 2026-04-06 08:09
@Okanogen@mastodon.social maybe that ist why they fight climate science. If there are no forecasts, you could speculate on sunshine hours and wind speeds.
-
@tecHunt@mastodon.social 2026-04-06 08:31
@Okanogen@mastodon.social Instead of volume, the focus must be on stability and predictability. (e.g every new solar park must come with a battery). Grids must be modernized with better interconnects. Commercial as well as home(!) usage must be monitored by grid operators to react faster. Better long term storage solutions (days instead of hours) must be funded. I'm not against renewables and I'm not for more home surveillance, but it's also not as simple as solar/wind/hydro good, natgas/coal/oil/nuclear bad.
-
@dnkboston@apobangpo.space 2026-04-06 08:53
@Okanogen@mastodon.social I'm guessing there will still be plenty of money to be made on mining futures. cc @gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green
-
@michael_w_busch@mastodon.online 2026-04-06 14:03
@Okanogen@mastodon.social @ai6yr@m.ai6yr.org I submit that there are plenty of ways to make money from a clean power gird. Have slightly better wind speed forecasts or cloud models. Make money. Know which dam will need to be rebuilt. Make money. Or whatever. But that is different from existing fossil fuel power / heating / fuel systems. And so the people who make money from those act to keep them going; hurting everyone.