2026-09-15 13:45 UTC
Replies (5)
-
@brunogirin@mastodon.me.uk 2026-09-15 14:22
@mttaggart@infosec.exchange FYI the purple colour of your links makes them unreadable on a dark background on a small screen.
-
@da_667@infosec.exchange 2026-09-15 14:32
@mttaggart@infosec.exchange excellent read. I just wanna add something that even the call for the government to regulate them is another attempt at getting money - taxpayer money in this case, and also choking out the competition. I also wanna state that AI capability of remediating misuse, abuse, and preventing attacks is so bad, that I've seen not one, not two, but at least three different job listings for the different AI companies offering obscene amounts of money to deal with those subjects at some of the big names. On top of that, there have been at least two different places now that tried to recruit me for some kind of a job answering cybersecurity related questions for the AI in order to train their models for them. and of course, they're offering peanuts for the onerous task of digitizing the knowledge I've spent over a decade acquiring.
-
@andrew@this.wplr.rocks 2026-09-15 15:44
@mttaggart@infosec.exchange your piece was well written.
-
@psh@infosec.exchange 2026-09-15 21:32
@mttaggart@infosec.exchange So basically they're choosing between a sudden, chaotic market crash or slow, legally enforced economic stagnation that could lead to a crash.
-
@AAKL@infosec.exchange 2026-09-15 14:27
@mttaggart@infosec.exchange Honestly, that's even too kind for all the crap and madness we get every few weeks. For Anthropic, this is a loop. The quest for profit isn't in question. It's a constant. But something triggers this every now and then (the IPO?), and the company decides to go unhinged and cry wolf again. And maybe that's the thing: the more these companies cry wolf, the less people believe them, and that way, they get away with whatever they want to do under the radar, except that this method will snap back and punch them in the face.