Post #855971
2026-03-30 11:10 UTC
Replies (13)
-
@gastonrampersad@mastodon.social 2026-03-30 11:16
@mrtazz "stochastic labubu” :welp: :scremcat:
-
@alxndr@tech.lgbt 2026-03-30 13:43
@mrtazz 2016: the code is self-documenting 2026: *spends hours perfecting detailed tutorials inside a hidden folder*
-
@babble_endanger@freeradical.zone 2026-03-30 14:46
@mrtazz so true but hopefully they're not the same person lol
-
@cptodin@twoot.site 2026-03-30 15:06
@mrtazz I love the term stochastic labubu
-
@raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie 2026-03-30 16:57
@mrtazz See C A R Hoare on producing correct software: Either cleverly simple or massively large and complex. Simple is easier to check but much harder to design. A curse on managers that want to go straight from a Marketing Dept request to people actually coding. You can't even estimate project duration, complexity and risk without capturing the real requirements in formal logical language and then doing a design (with no coding!)
-
@jimkennedy@mas.to 2026-03-30 17:56
@mrtazz #StochasticLabubu #ftw
-
@rainynight65@aus.social 2026-03-30 21:11
@mrtazz "Stochastic labubu". Don't mind if I steal that.
-
@rafa_font@mastodon.online 2026-03-30 22:20
@mrtazz 2026 - "Stochastic labubu has a blog and spits out 17 articles a day, I might activate an agentic labubu to double check the contents and mail me a report daily."
-
@cairobraga@gts.cairobraga.com 2026-03-30 16:38
@mrtazz "stochastic labubu" is a BANGER
-
@joshin4colours@mastodon.social 2026-04-15 14:16
@mrtazz remember code as liability?
-
@SharpCheddarGoblin@kolektiva.social 2026-04-15 22:26
@mrtazz We're writing too much code. Less code. No, less than that. Take some back.
-
@ChrisHunt@hachyderm.io 2026-04-16 11:12
@mrtazz Stochastic labubu is hauntingly accurate.
-
@kittylyst@mastodon.social 2026-04-16 16:45
@mrtazz Hey, could you possibly crosspost this on BSky? Oh, wait.