@Em0nM4stodon@infosec.exchange
Post #4142410
2026-07-27 17:08 UTC
Replies (8)
-
@aud@fire.asta.lgbt 2026-07-27 19:53
@Em0nM4stodon@infosec.exchange Those "AI detector" services are worse than useless, anyway, statistically speaking (because they're harmful), but they're also just... not really possible. An analog would be like trying to determine if your ruler was accurate... by measuring it against itself. It just doesn't work or make any sense.
-
@Simplicator@federate.social 2026-07-27 22:50
@Em0nM4stodon@infosec.exchange Guess it doesn’t take one to know one… when the “one” in question can’t actually “know” anything #AI
-
@reformed_content_marketer@mastodon.social 2026-07-28 01:23
@Em0nM4stodon@infosec.exchange There have been plenty of times when an AI "AI-detector" claimed my completely human-written content was partially AI-generated. These tools are so stupid, yet so many people trust them. I wish there were a reliable, non-privacy-invasive way of assuring human provenance so we could stop these kinds of false accusations. I want there to be reliably AI-free spaces again. All I can really do is use the trust system and hope that showing someone a doc's history occasionally is enough
-
@sidalsolgun@infosec.exchange 2026-07-27 23:14
@Em0nM4stodon@infosec.exchange my teacher in Canada told me "you're using AI" just because my homework was great. (It wasn't that good imo) I defended myself but I still wonder what makes him think that, like AI detector or just a guess? I wouldn't say my homework was great anyways, I did it with my shitty English. The same thing is happening to other students too like they're doing the homework by themselves but the AI detector says "it's AI". What a year to live in... Edit: And it's so fuckin rude and disgusting to say "you're using AI" in the middle of the class. Jfc...
-
@bcasiello@floss.social 2026-07-28 03:44
@Em0nM4stodon@infosec.exchange AI vendors are probably highly motivated to make AIs lean toward false positives. 1. The more people see AI-identified stuff, the more ubiquitous and inevitable it seems. 2. If it's any good, AI gets the credit. If they could actually detect quality, you can bet that only crap would get identified as 'not AI'.
-
@nest@infosec.exchange 2026-07-28 06:05
@Em0nM4stodon@infosec.exchange You're absolutely right, I see the issue now. There is no reliable way to tell if something is written by an AI since many people use a similar writing style. Would you like me to provide you a list of AI detectors? [♻️ regenerate]
-
@wevdap@mastodon.world 2026-07-27 17:11
@Em0nM4stodon@infosec.exchange Turing tests are hard enough, but how to test the Turing tester?
-
@plutarch@gotosocial.plutar.ch 2026-07-27 17:17
@Em0nM4stodon@infosec.exchange