Elektrine lite

← Feed

@joXn@wandering.shop

Post #2686114

2026-05-08 14:37 UTC

@benfry@information.garden @cstross@wandering.shop @mjtsai@mastodon.social Unironically, word processing kind of peaked at Microsoft Word for Mac 5.

Replies (8)

  • @mjtsai@mastodon.social 2026-05-08 14:41

    @joXn@wandering.shop Word for Mac 5 was good, but I liked 90s WordPerfect and Nisus Writer better.

    Open ##2686115

  • @soapdog@social.soapdog.org 2026-05-08 15:25

    @joXn@wandering.shop @benfry@information.garden @cstross@wandering.shop @mjtsai@mastodon.social agreed

    Open ##2686119

  • @joXn@wandering.shop @benfry@information.garden @cstross@wandering.shop @mjtsai@mastodon.social I'm a writer and I've never used Word. Went from Locoscript to Appleworks, which became Corel somewhere along the way, to WordPerfect and Open Office. Now I use LibreOffice and that suits me fine.

    Open ##2686120

  • @GreenMtnBear@4bear.com 2026-05-08 15:38

    As one of the technical writers on Word for DOS, Word for Windows, and Word for Mac, I'm embarrassed at what it's mutated into. I no longer use it except where required. I use a Markdown editor or LibreOffice. (edited for a grammar error) @joXn@wandering.shop @benfry@information.garden @cstross@wandering.shop @mjtsai@mastodon.social

    Open ##2686121

  • @oblomov@sociale.network 2026-05-08 16:18

    @joXn@wandering.shop @benfry@information.garden @cstross@wandering.shop @mjtsai@mastodon.social that's a very weird way to write WordPerfect 5.1 for DOS

    Open ##2686122

  • @robabram@mas.to 2026-05-08 17:42

    @joXn@wandering.shop @benfry@information.garden @cstross@wandering.shop @mjtsai@mastodon.social As far as getting documents to look exactly the way I want without unnecessary effort goes, it’s a toss-up between Signum on the Atari ST and ClarisWorks on a beige Mac for me… everything since then has been hidden & undiscoverable behaviours wrapped up in bloat.

    Open ##2686127

  • @joXn@wandering.shop @benfry@information.garden @cstross@wandering.shop @mjtsai@mastodon.social @mwl@io.mwl.io It's known that all software hits a "Goldilocks point". It's in the literature, although few read it, and no managers believe it. Software hits a point where it has the right features, at the right level, for the right audience. It has the minimum # of bugs. All changes after this point make the software _worse_. You get more complex or more fragile or more bugs. We have to learn to leave well-enough alone.

    Open ##2686128

  • @ed1conf@bsd.network 2026-05-08 23:33

    Unironically, word processing kind of peaked with writing *roff or LaTeX in ed(1). :flan_wink: @joXn@wandering.shop @benfry@information.garden @cstross@wandering.shop @mjtsai@mastodon.social

    Open ##2686133