Elektrine lite

← Feed

@simon@procrastodon.net

Post #2310930

2026-05-08 22:41 UTC

I wonder if any category of tech is as abandoned as my box of TV stuff. I have a talking Samsung TV, multiple Apple TVs, the NVIDIA shield (a much faster Android streaming box than Google's option at the time), a Fire Cube, an HDMI splitter, an infrared repeater, and too many cables and remotes. Oh, and I have a digital TV box from Rogers which is still in its original packaging, because trying to figure out how to set it up and use it just seems really daunting. I do have free cable channels in this apartment, so that might be the thing that's most worth keeping, but it's also the only device that doesn't talk. I thought he TV would make a decent media hub and I liked the idea of all the talking boxes for it, but I think at the end of the day I don't have enough reason to use it. Most streaming boxes are built for the major streaming services, and I now pay for none of those, except prime video I suppose. There's so much messy inconsistency in which shows are described where, and being in a country that isn't the US just makes it ten times worse. But the Apple TV isn't designed for loading arbitrary audio files. And if I cut out the TV itself as a dependency and try to use something like an HDMI audio extractor, it works, but I haven't found one that respects the volume signals sent by the Apple TV. Even if I connect the Apple TV to Airpods, the volume controls (either on the remote or the AirPods themselves) have no effect when no TV is connected. All these small papercuts have just caused me to realize that there's nothing wrong with listening to shows on my phone or a dedicated media player, and treating them like any other audio files. As flawed as Bluetooth is, it also works with fewer dependencies than any other wireless audio protocol. So, my TV is now abandoned on the wall in an awkward viewing place with a bunch of abandoned equipment hooked up to it. I wonder if it's worth trying to sell some of this stuff. Even if I keep an Apple TV and an Android TV for testing, that still leaves a lot more unused devices. The root of this problem isn't necessarily straight-forward accessibility. it's a mix of my own stubbornness, the fact I didn't engage with TV very much at all until sometime in the 2020s, and some accessibility and accessibility-adjacent problems, like the availability of audio-described content across streaming services and the ability to add postprocessing to episodes with quiet dialog. I know there are plenty of people who just use Netflix and Disney Plus on their Apple TV through their Sonos speakers. And if I'm honest, I have legitimate practical reasons for using the audio versions instead, but part of it is just a natural inclination against any platform that locks me into its UI. It's the same reason Amazon will never be able to make Kindle accessible enough for me to use it if I have the option of removing the DRM from my kindle books. Is this the mentality of a pirate or is it the mentality of someone who just wants one more thing to remain consistent and controllable? I don't know, but I guess I've concluded I don't have a good enough reason to change it.

Replies (3)

  • @jscholes@dragonscave.space 2026-05-08 23:04

    @simon@procrastodon.net I was in the UK recently, staying at my parents' place. They have a pricy satellite TV subscription, the box has a screen reader, AD is easy to toggle, there's plenty of described shows, and the box has AirPlay that doesn't require a code. And yet, I found myself just listening to Audible on AirPods. The schedules for most of the live broadcast channels were so repetitive with far too much overlap; at one point the same mediocre quiz show was being shown on five separate, completely unaffiliated channels. Many had crappy teleshopping for seven hours a day, while others repeated the same block of programming on a loop. Of the hundreds of advertise channels, a significant percentage were timeshift Services, and I had a hard time working out why and how most of the rest were continuing to exist while showing so much dross. All of that to say, I came away with an impression that live TV is a dying platform and my decision to not own a television completely validated. Granted, the shift to streaming services isn't new or news, but I feel like most of those are sliding in the same direction anyway. How many times can Netflix make the same generic thriller? How many Amazon originals create a true emotional impact? Will AI not just make this all worse?

    Open ##2785818

  • @adam@fedi.adamm.cc 2026-05-08 23:21

    @simon@procrastodon.net That's a lot of TV equipment. I can't say I can relate in any way on that front, but what I can relate to is not caring for any of the multitude of inconsistent interfaces and user experiences across a multitude of platforms. I have multiple collections of things I got from sources who got them from their sources, and thus Winamp, a pair of Corsair HS80 headphones, or my mixing console and studio monitors do just fine for media consumption for me. When mobile, iPhone and some sort of media player that supports network playback over aVPN connection, and that's all I really need and want.

    Open ##2785820

  • @mhussain@universeodon.com 2026-05-09 18:19

    @simon@procrastodon.net what about my Sony TV (KDL-65W955B) older than your geer? yeah the smart things have become dumber but the hardware's good

    Open ##2785822