@caffeinatedgeek@thecanadian.social
Post #1712583
2026-04-26 15:38 UTC
Replies (5)
-
@krst@mastodon.social 2026-04-26 15:46
@caffeinatedgeek@thecanadian.social Makes sense. Also I have no clue why AI is included, he claimed it is designed to addictive, which it is not, unlike social media. I have no idea how this could possibly be implemented securely
-
@Plumbert@thecanadian.social 2026-04-26 16:08
@caffeinatedgeek@thecanadian.social 100%
-
@xyhhx@438punk.house 2026-04-26 16:17
@caffeinatedgeek@thecanadian.social theyre not "falling for the trap", theyre springing it
-
@kboyd@phpc.social 2026-04-26 16:26
@caffeinatedgeek@thecanadian.social @beandreams@friendhole.social If anything, this is a hidden-in-plain-sight subsidy to them (by not requiring to do that).
-
@graand@thecanadian.social 2026-04-26 21:39
@caffeinatedgeek@thecanadian.social I mostly agree but have questions. If it’s a statement of intent that hasn’t been fully thought out, then it’s purely a political thing. If it’s a reaction that might sound good and be popular then it’s also political but in a trend more often used by PP and the right wing gang. If it’s a serious thing, then details please. Any attempt to force ID on anyone using open online services is definitely a data trap.