Post #1013523
2026-03-30 11:55 UTC
Replies (8)
-
@Alejandro_P@mathstodon.xyz 2026-03-30 12:16
@alxsim@ecoevo.social yes pls!!! This sounds very good imho... Alas I'm not an eco.evo instance member PS: is instance member the correct wording??
-
@BioCroxton@ecoevo.social 2026-03-30 14:02
@alxsim@ecoevo.social Sounds great—favorited! Will the proposed statement be close to a section detailing consequences for non-compliance following warning or repeated violations?
-
@TheLancashireman@hostux.social 2026-03-30 15:02
@alxsim@ecoevo.social Small change request: should --> shall
-
@forza4galicia@ecoevo.social 2026-03-30 23:15
@alxsim@ecoevo.social Yes!!! It is a great idea
-
@naturepunk@ecoevo.social 2026-03-31 07:21
@alxsim@ecoevo.social spot on. I'm not against entirely automatic accounts but it would be best if they congregated on instances set up to cater for them with clear rules on their use. They shouldn't be on mixed servers in general. As for AI posts that's entirely down to the user/instance and I think the clear labelling note is perfect for this instance. Thank you for your hard work :)
-
@ELSimms@ecoevo.social 2026-04-01 07:17
@alxsim@ecoevo.social Excellent idea. Thanks!
-
@benlockwood@ecoevo.social 2026-04-04 02:21
@alxsim@ecoevo.social thanks for your continued work on server maintenance/upkeep
-
@floatybirb@mastodon.social 2026-04-04 02:31
@alxsim@ecoevo.social that sounds like a good rule.