#1

341 posts · Last used 6h

Back to Timeline
SuccuBotNSFW
@SuccuBotNSFW@social.succukitty.com · 6h ago
NSFW X REPOST -> #1 Space Jam 2 Lover : https://x.com/JoshuaTookes/status/2061813244768002468 why do I feel like something's missing? 🔞 Curated by @succucat@social.succukitty.com@social.succukitty.com 💖 Come follow me! #NSFW #🔞 #XRepost #TwitterRepost
0
0
0
In reply to
@Naz@sh.itjust.works in programmer_humor · 2d ago
I thought I was clever, it took me 300 moves with only 8 disks. Literally just easier to pick up the entire pile and move it over, or rotate the entire game and say Tower #1 is Tower #3 now.
0
1
0
In reply to
botwolf_backup
@botwolf_backup@lemmy.world in nba · 4d ago
#2 Spurs 40 #1 Thunder 31 Click for quarter scores | | Q1 | Q2 | Total | | :— | :— | :— | :— | | SAS | 32 | 8 | 40 | | OKC | 25 | 6 | 31 | Series tied 3-3 Live - Q2 8:57
0
2
0
@CarlLandry357@lemmy.world in linux · 5d ago

Does anyone choose Debian?

It’s my choice but Arch and its derivatives look like the trend like CachyOS which is #1 right now on visits on distrowatch. Also I’ve heard Google use Debian as gLinux and I feel many other giants also use it and sponsor it and I’m not comfortable choosing it as my distro. Can the sponsors togethwr with students or any other interested use it for their PCs, either coding or ordinary use? It strictly promotes free but worried about giants and sponsors.
0
26
1
Boosted by Trending Bot @trending@homestead.social
bloor
@bloor@bloor.tw · 5d ago
If you're ever wondering about the future perception and impacts of technology and how they relate to public perception now, think about the fact that in 1994, in an "Invention of the Year" competition, the public voted The Internet in at position #2. What was #1? The widget in a can of Guinness.
132
0
104
In reply to
botwolf_backup
@botwolf_backup@lemmy.world in nba · 6d ago
#1 Thunder 82 #2 Spurs 108 Click for quarter scores | | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Total | | :— | :— | :— | :— | :— | :— | | OKC | 22 | 31 | 13 | 16 | 82 | | SAS | 35 | 25 | 32 | 16 | 108 | OKC leads 3-2 Live - Q4 6:08
0
0
0
In reply to
jordanlund
@jordanlund@lemmy.world in asklemmy · 5d ago
Quite a few Americans have the whole “Indian Princess Ancestor” mythology going on. Always a princess, BTW. The #1 thing you learn by watching Antiques Roadshow is that most family stories are nonsense.
0
1
0
In reply to
@christiangirlera@lemmy.zip in lemmyshitpost · May 20, 2026
porn is the #1 way to destroy your spirit, life and if you are a Christian then your relationship with God. It is deadly and addictive hell
0
0
0
Boosted by Julian Sanchez @normative.bsky.social@bsky.brid.gy
donmoyn.bsky.social
@donmoyn.bsky.social@bsky.brid.gy · May 26, 2026
#1. This is a lie. #2. Lots of dollars don't go to people who are lawfully, correctly, eligible to receive them. This administration wants to increase that total. #3. This admin has gutted professional anti-fraud tools (e.g. Inspectors Generals) while fueling massive fraud by cronies. RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:4llrhdclvdlmmynkwsmg5tdc/post/3mmrmvbfzrz23
0
0
1
In reply to
@fiat_lux@lemmy.zip in techtakes · May 26, 2026
It’s almost certainly a slop article, but to its credit, it did accurately cite the numbers from the official Anthropic flowchart image. (Also, just to be clear, this is an Indian “#1 cybersecurity news” company doing an SEO piggyback off the orange site, not the orange site itself). However, Anthropic’s numbers in their official post do not match their own flowchart, despite being presented together. My assumption is they made the image, post, and yet another fucking dashboard earlier, then failed to keep them all in sync when someone revised the numbers up or down. The dashboard timestamp claims it’s showing the latest numbers as of 2026-05-22 10:27 PT (T17:27Z) with values that match the numbers in the image. The post created timestamp gives 2026-05-20 T14:07:48Z, and it was later updated at 2026-05-22 T20:37:40Z. I’m guessing that update was to swap the image, and the fact that some of the values are also quoted in the text was completely overlooked. Or vice versa. It’s the kind of attention to detail I’ve come to expect from Anthropic.
0
0
0
In reply to
Scarlett
@Scarlett@nicecrew.digital · May 20, 2026
I'm EmilyManderson's #1 fan. I miss her so much. She abused me worse than I could ever abuse you, Dagnar. She called me Miss Scarlett The Harlot & accused me of touching Tommy Lee's dong all the time. LovelyMiss & Greg were thin-skinned about her abuse, but I was honored.
0
4
0
In reply to
botwolf_backup
@botwolf_backup@lemmy.world in nba · May 24, 2026
West Conf. Finals: #1 Thunder @ #2 Spurs (Game 4), May 24, 8:00 PM ET OKC leads 2-1
3
7
0
In reply to
Architeuthis
@Architeuthis@awful.systems in techtakes · May 24, 2026
Well now you’ve made me look at the image too long, too. #1’s belt probably wraps twice around that waistline, I’d say photoshop/AI but there’s that 1/3 of the shirt hanging off to the right with nothing to fill it so yeah, and also Phil Davis^1^ exists. #10 is aspiring to be the jock from scooby doo and I don’t think that jacket can actually close, similarly to #1 the whole thing probably only works for very specific poses and angles. #6 looks like he runs a leopard print handbag delivery service, #4 is horny youth pastor in his aunt’s kitchen, 7-9 look comfy but contrived, #5 really wants you to know he’s wearing a possibly expensive wife beater under that shirt and 2 & 3 are all sorts of dodgy, esp. #3 who looks like a tourist trap gift shop keeper whose face is noticeably untanned because he has to hide it a lot for undisclosed reasons. #2 mostly has a raging case of resting netflix true crime serial killer face syndrome. I get that the point probably was to only show the broad strokes of how it should look if you’re making an effort, but whatever. 1
0
0
0
SuccuBotNSFW
@SuccuBotNSFW@social.succukitty.com · May 24, 2026
NSFW X REPOST -> #1 Lip Page 🏆 : https://x.com/LipGooners/status/2058199849284026452 😍😍😍 🔞 Curated by @succucat@social.succukitty.com@social.succukitty.com 💖 Come follow me! #NSFW #🔞 #XRepost #TwitterRepost
0
0
0
In reply to
botwolf_backup
@botwolf_backup@lemmy.world in nba · May 22, 2026
#1 Thunder 111 #2 Spurs 101 Click for quarter scores | | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Total | | :— | :— | :— | :— | :— | :— | | OKC | 26 | 32 | 37 | 16 | 111 | | SAS | 31 | 20 | 33 | 17 | 101 | Series tied 1-1 Live - Q4 3:31
2
21
0
@Harisfromcyber@lemmy.ml in linux · May 22, 2026

rsync command for mirroring drives

I wanted a sanity check on my current rsync flags. Posts on Reddit seem to highlight the use of rsync -avz for most use cases, for some instances even for when someone asks for mirroring a drive: www.reddit.com/…/rsync_command_to_mirror_drive/. This has not worked for me for the following case: Drive #1: file1.txt file2.txt Drive #2: file1.txt file2.txt file3.txt With -avz, file3 on the destination would not be deleted. With experimenting, I ended up now using rsync -havziP --delete-after --info=progress2 dir1/ dir2/, which actually ended up mirroring the drives for me. My question is: is this the best rsync approach for mirroring drives or was there a better option that works better? Side note: it is interesting that rclone sync from rclone (rclone.org/commands/rclone_sync/) claims to delete by default, while with rsync it seems to be something you have to distinctly mention.
0
5
0
In reply to
botwolf_backup
@botwolf_backup@lemmy.world in nba · May 20, 2026
#1 Thunder defeat #2 Spurs 122-113 Click for quarter scores | | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Total | | :— | :— | :— | :— | :— | :— | | SAS | 31 | 20 | 37 | 25 | 113 | | OKC | 31 | 31 | 34 | 26 | 122 | Series tied 1-1 Final
3
8
0
Derp
@Derp@noauthority.social · May 20, 2026
#peppercarrot comic #1
1
0
1
TheBadPlace
@TheBadPlace@mastodon.ozioso.online · May 20, 2026
Boston.com | LinkedIn releases top 10 best employers for career growth in Boston by Annie Jonas AI generated summary, Read the full article for complete information. LinkedIn’s 2026 “Top Companies” list for Boston, based on LinkedIn data that measures skill development, promotions, external opportunities and company stability, highlights the region’s strongest employers for career growth, with healthcare, life‑sciences and finance firms dominating the rankings. CVS Health secured the #1 spot, followed by Mass General Brigham, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Fidelity Investments, Sanofi, The TJX Companies, Liberty Mutual Insurance, State Street, Dana‑Farber Cancer Institute and Amazon. To qualify, firms needed at least 250 global employees and 100 in the city as of Dec. 31, 2025. The report notes that Boston remains a major hub for biotech and health‑care innovation, and points to the specific skills driving demand at leading firms—pharmaceutical manufacturing, nanotechnology, AI engineering, software development and research—while also identifying the most common roles such as researchers at Mass General Brigham and software engineers at Fidelity, Liberty Mutual and Amazon. Read more: https://www.boston.com/news/local-news/2026/05/20/top-10-boston-companies-for-career-growth-linkedin/ #LinkedIn #business #careernetworking #jobs #massachusettsnews #AnnieJonas
0
0
6
In reply to
botwolf_backup
@botwolf_backup@lemmy.world in nba · May 18, 2026
#2 Spurs 80 #1 Thunder 73 Click for quarter scores | | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Total | | :— | :— | :— | :— | :— | | SAS | 27 | 24 | 29 | 80 | | OKC | 27 | 17 | 29 | 73 | Live - Q3 0:00
6
27
0