zloubida

I swear to God, go fuck yourself

https://taffndaisy.neocities.org/?pg=5#showComic

I just want things to change. The situation is dire for women, we men must acknowledge that if we want equality. This thread and the reactions here are a confirmation that I’m right.

Do you actually believe that men are negatively discriminated?

Men are trash sure; but so is this meme.

That’s the selfishness that will kill us ull.

You’re right about the description of the work organization. And now? We’re fighting to change these things but in the meantime? Class solidarity is not just words: it’s accepting to make sacrifices for others who need something more than me. And even in a perfect world where the employers would willing to hire more people, or if the firms were socially owned, things wouldn’t be perfect. Some jobs are in tension: not enough candidates. Some times a big part of the workforce, no just one coworker, want to leave at the same time. Epidemics will still occur. School holidays will still be at the same periods for everyone. Even in a socialist utopia, there would be schedule conflicts (far less than today, but still). We should in this matter like in the others apply the old principle: from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs. Parents will always have more needs than childless people, because they are themselves needed, and the mode of production will not change that. (Of course, it also applies to people having a relative suffering from a chronic or debilitating illness.)

Parents chose to have kids; kids don’t chose to be born. Flexibility should be given to everyone; priority should still be given to those to need it to take care of others. Because if you give a lot of flexibility to everyone, schedule conflicts will occur.

It’s not always possible. When it is, of course it should be for everyone; but children should have their parents with them when they’re sick or when school is closed. And that often means that childless workers can’t be on holiday at the same time.

Capitalism is not an excuse not to stand in solidarity within the working class. And capitalism doesn’t make society disappear, in spite of what they would want us to believe.

Gift may not be the right word, you’re right; but English is not my mother tongue and I didn’t find a better one.

And it’s your choice, which is absolutely respectable. But refusing to support your society’s children because you’re childless is not better that being against DEI because you’re white. When it’s possible to give the same flexibility to everybody, that should be done of course, but it’s not always the case.

A society should always prioritize its weaker members. Children are among these. The flexibility given to the parents is not a gift to the parents, but to the children.

Absolument.

WYSIWYM for the win

What I say is that there is more than three variables. The three variables are already the result of addition if other variables rounded.

Unless 40.5, 56.5 and 3.5 are themselves additions of rounded numbers. It’s generally how that works.

Approve and disapprove are generally a collection of different possible response generally (for example strongly approve, approve, slightly approve) which all can be rounded. When you round the result of an addition of rounded numbers, the result can be slightly off, without changing the significance of the result.

It’s called rounding, and it’s quite common.

I agree, I’m as much pro-abortion right as one can get, and yet I understand the fox’s reaction. He speaks about sin just one time, and his reaction would be understandable even without it. I imagine a man, in love with his wife and who would love to be a father, be renounced to this dream because his wife is sterile, and he chose her over his own desire to be a father. And one day she announces him that she’s pregnant and want an abortion… you can be in favour of this right, and still feel very bad.

I’ll regret asking I’m sure but… which comics?