username_1

Hmmm. Who? The last airbender Aang?

So, fighting for some basic freedom for kids is "pessimistic" and looking for flaws in their cage letting at least some of them to get free is... good? Correct? What a nice guy, "security expert". Helping to keep those pesky kids in line. Correct?

We already let it happen. And all we must do is "unlet" it from happen. Not investigate the quality of shit.

Kids: Fuck you, "security expert". Thanks for making our situation even worse. Those government institute will surely force that shit upon us and we have no reliable ways to fight back. The only real way to mitigate the situation was letting those morons to roll out noneffective way to punish us for nothing. But here you are, making us suffer just for a chance of looking clever on the Internet.

In my time we were reading textbooks and write in notebooks at school. Some clever and mostly boring stuff. It looks like modern schools are quite different…

Optimization is a victory over the chaos!

What is omphe and why do they need 3?

That is nice that you have understood my joke.

I remember Trump was experimenting with some *coin. He should try to convince ayatollas to use it instead of Bitcoin.

That’s the question to corporations, not to LLMs.

You need to reread my comment.

yes. What “yes”?

destructive costs YouTube storing shitillions of dickabytes of cat videos “costs” much more while being completely useless. But those are funny cat videos. Hands off of those videos. Yes?

They save my time tremendously while searching for something in documentation. Especially if I don’t know if it is actually there.

And people do use them. Naturally. What about that “forcing” thing you’re talking about? Look around. You’re being forced with everything by corporations. Why would this new cool technology should be an exception? You’re forced to watch sport events, listen to modern music, wear some vogue clothes, kiss your beloved leader’s ass, hate those evil Cubans or Ukrainians (depending on who your owner is).

So maybe you should fight against dick-shoving billionaires, not against useful tools?

No idea why people do that. I suppose some people are too dumb to write code and some other people are too dumb to understand what programmers use LLMs for. What dumb people do best? Attentionwhoring, screaming and throwing hysterical tantrums.

That would be wonderful if those anti-AI folk would stop using LLMs and switch their attention to something more constructive. But they can’t.

Or we can refuse to listen to anti-“AI” crazies.

My reason: because you have provided no text to concentrate on. Just a link to some site where I expected to crawl through tons of menus, cookies reminders, photos of diverse people happily smiling and pop-up windows asking for subscription. So I ignore it altogether.

Under… what? Those “places” crossed fascism line a decade ago. Marasmus line a few years ago. What additional regulation do you want? VIN number of the user’s ass?

That’s easy: start like a shed and add machinery after finishing the roof.

Can you even play clarinet? If you think that it would be enough just to fart there, you’re wrong.

:)

The guy doesn’t want Windows but is ok with Mac. That’s… not how it works. At all.

Your browser doesn’t remember addresses and you type in them every time? Well…

The definition of fascism is trivial: only one ideology is permitted (no matter what that ideology is exactly), anything else is forbidden. So any forced limitations without objectively obvious/proven reasons that are welcome by community is fascism. As simple as that. Limitations of theft and killings are not fascism because most people are against those activities. Limitations on education access is fascism because most people welcome education. Those who have different opinions can impose their own private limitations in the non-fascist community. Like age restrictions for this or that activity.

99% of machines use multiple users on their OS. Different users for different programs is a widespread Unix-like OS approach to security.