tty5
@tty5@lemmy.world
lemmy
0.19.17-8-gded733659
0
Followers
0
Following
Joined July 01, 2023
Posts
Open post
In reply to
tty5
@tty5@lemmy.world
lemmy.world
@tty5@lemmy.world
in
technology
·
Dec 11, 2025
Nothing makes them talk about gun control faster than minorities arming.
View full thread on lemmy.world
0
0
0
0
Open post
In reply to
tty5
@tty5@lemmy.world
lemmy.world
@tty5@lemmy.world
in
technology
·
Dec 11, 2025
While doing that for 80 companies is not feasible I doubt all 80 members are opposed. Valve and AMD could talk to video card, monitor, laptop and handheld makers to pad the membership enough.
As for the democracy question a quick skim of their bylaws suggests it’s close enough.
View full thread on lemmy.world
3
0
0
0
Open post
In reply to
tty5
@tty5@lemmy.world
lemmy.world
@tty5@lemmy.world
in
technology
·
Dec 10, 2025
AMD has had the code ready to include in their open source driver for a while and has been trying to get HDMI Forum to let them release it for a long time www.phoronix.com/news/HDMI-2.1-OSS-Rejected
View full thread on lemmy.world
13
0
0
0
Open post
In reply to
tty5
@tty5@lemmy.world
lemmy.world
@tty5@lemmy.world
in
technology
·
Dec 10, 2025
Fewer than 80 members. 15k/year membership fee and very lax joining requirements. $1.2M gets you majority allowing you do to whatever even with 100% of current members opposing :P
View full thread on lemmy.world
28
0
0
0
Open post
In reply to
tty5
@tty5@lemmy.world
lemmy.world
@tty5@lemmy.world
in
technology
·
Dec 10, 2025
HDMI Forum has fewer than 80 members and membership fee is 15,000 USD/year. Valve could spin up 80 companies, have them join the forum for a low low price of 1.2M USD and outvote remaining members to open source the entire spec.
View full thread on lemmy.world
252
23
0
0
Open post
In reply to
tty5
@tty5@lemmy.world
lemmy.world
@tty5@lemmy.world
in
technology
·
Dec 10, 2025
They charge a fee for access to the spec and maintain who can claim their products are HDMI compliant and require compliance testing on those products.
An open source implementation would make that spec public and strip a lot of control they hold.
View full thread on lemmy.world
4
0
0
0