thedeadwalking4242

YSK, there's a large number of older Kindles that can be jail broken. I just ssh pirated .mobi files into mine

I'm terrified I'll never be able to find somewhere to work where this isn't the case. Deeply terrified.

On the one hand software freedom. On the other this has me thinking about how fascinating this problem is from academic standpoint. How can you ensure software can ONLY run on the machines you allow? Even if the user has ring 0 access? Is it mathematically impossible to achieve?

Any question that you could get the answer too from reading a sentence or two from a book or article is generally an LLM will probably be able to answer. It’s good for surface level exploratory research. The deeper you go the more fallacies and bias start to enter the mix. LLMs by nature are biased and will only present you with one or two solutions/options/opinions on why and what. Knowing when your hitting that point is difficult. I urge you to read documentation and human written guides and articles once you find yourself surprising what the LLM can give you. As a software developer and script writer myself I can guarantee you what a LLM writes is not “gold” it’s more like bronze at best.

It’s double speak. People learned the power of words and now they are abusing them. The American public with all their faults will nearly trust any written word. Anything besides what they’ve already been programmed to immediately be skeptical of they will readily accept into their reality like good little consumers.

It’s ok for very furnace level exploration. Like 100 level stuff. If it’s something you’d google and easily find in an article it’s likely to do a ok job. I’ve also found it’s good for tedious straightforward tasks. Anything that would be uncomfortable or timely or automate manually. Best for one offs. I’ve also found it’s extremly good for translation, which was it’s originally use.

I’m sitting next to house because if I don’t bother him he’ll probably pop a couple vicoden and take a shot and sleep

Apex legends… I know, I know

Except information from Google was human made at least to some degree. With LLMs there is no guarantee

I wish the Internet never existed so I wouldn't have to see opinions like these

Unfortunately not

Need to add illegal gambling to the list

Yeah I think I’d rather stick a CPU up my ass then use a Nvidia CPU an any computer I own.

Second this. People who don’t understand tech blame anything that’s different for their problems even if unrelated.

It’s a language model not a classification model. People have already tried a similar experiment to have LLMs detect if a LLM wrote text or not and it couldn’t.

Usually the response I get is “Actually there’s historical fact that jesus was alive and there was a flood and that the earth is 5000s year old and there’s a firmament. Scientific fact! 🤓👆” Drives me insane. Even the reasonable Christians eat this shit up.