TheMagicalC
@cwg1231@defcon.social
Amateur radio and physical security enjoyer, computer hater and programmer. Born onto the front lines of the fight for accessibility in education. Musician, maker, and artist. Tea and coffee lover, nuclear professional. Trans rights are human rights. Over 18.
defcon.social
TheMagicalC
@cwg1231@defcon.social
Amateur radio and physical security enjoyer, computer hater and programmer. Born onto the front lines of the fight for accessibility in education. Musician, maker, and artist. Tea and coffee lover, nuclear professional. Trans rights are human rights. Over 18.
defcon.social
@cwg1231@defcon.social
·
Sep 15, 2025
@alexia I saw some discussion somewhere else on fedi about how the MIT license allows people to walk all over OSS developers. I'm starting to think that people should use "MIT except if you're a commercial user you have to pay $10/mo" or something like that. Personally I like GPL licensing my stuff, but if you want something more permissive, that might work better.
1
1
1
Conversation (1)
Showing 0 of 1 cached locally.
Syncing comments from the remote thread. 1 more reply is still loading.
Loading comments...