David
@deFractal__dup_29659@infosec.exchange
IT security student. Programmer of digital duck tape, learning to write digital plumbing. Aspiring cryptographer. Personal research interests include zero-knowledge credentials (to counter online antisocial conduct while protecting privacy) and AV/image non-repudiation (to counter deepfakes). Anti-exceptionalist egalitarian. Empirical pragmatist: evidence over ideology, results over rationalization. Theory is as good as the least of its falsifiability, its internal consistency, and its withstanding of attempted disproof. It is as useful as one is willing to revise or replace it when it falls.
infosec.exchange
David
@deFractal__dup_29659@infosec.exchange
IT security student. Programmer of digital duck tape, learning to write digital plumbing. Aspiring cryptographer. Personal research interests include zero-knowledge credentials (to counter online antisocial conduct while protecting privacy) and AV/image non-repudiation (to counter deepfakes). Anti-exceptionalist egalitarian. Empirical pragmatist: evidence over ideology, results over rationalization. Theory is as good as the least of its falsifiability, its internal consistency, and its withstanding of attempted disproof. It is as useful as one is willing to revise or replace it when it falls.
infosec.exchange
@deFractal__dup_29659@infosec.exchange
·
Jan 22, 2026
@cstross@wandering.shop @JessTheUnstill@infosec.exchange What if they did it indirectly, through tax policy? Pretend they’re trying to close international corporate tax loopholes, but “accidentally” leave spitting companies by jurisdiction as a way to evade those tax measures.
View full thread on infosec.exchange
0
0
0
Loading comments...