Finally an update to DKIM. See they slide in Ed25519 sigs pretending it wasn't already a standard that nobody implemented for like a whole decade (mostly, i think proton and a few smaller players support those sigs but none of the big guys budged.)
Doing something odd with JSON i think. Where is that supposed to go lol. Are we going to blow up the headers even more with JSON structures Header canonicalization on SMTP email is so much fun i know. :) i wrote my own signer. For v1 anyway. Took quite a bit of time for me to figure out that there can be no CRLF at the end of the header block you are signing :)
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dkim-dkim2-spec/00/
Waitman Gobble
@hello@rumbly.net
Hello Welcome To The New You I, me, mine, myself, we, us, ours, ourselves, you, your, yours, yourself, yourselves, he, him, his, himself, she, her, hers, herself, it, it's, itself, they, them, theirs, themselves
rumbly.net
Waitman Gobble
@hello@rumbly.net
Hello Welcome To The New You I, me, mine, myself, we, us, ours, ourselves, you, your, yours, yourself, yourselves, he, him, his, himself, she, her, hers, herself, it, it's, itself, they, them, theirs, themselves
rumbly.net
@hello@rumbly.net
·
5d ago
0
1
0
Conversation (1)
Showing 0 of 1 cached locally.
Syncing comments from the remote thread. 1 more reply is still loading.
Loading comments...