Lumpentheorist; abolitionist; critic of whiteness, workerist cosmogony, and the ableism of the Left. Masks are empathy fashion. Own it—make it yours. Intricate words fulfill me: Anticipate jargon here. Semantic critique ain't your jam? Don't whinge—just go away. Ace enby aphant WP in #NYC. they/them/gonzo/whatever If you would throw me and mine to the wolves so to claim victory over those wolves, you can take your Democratic National Chamberlain 🤡ass to someone else's mentions.
Lumpentheorist; abolitionist; critic of whiteness, workerist cosmogony, and the ableism of the Left. Masks are empathy fashion. Own it—make it yours. Intricate words fulfill me: Anticipate jargon here. Semantic critique ain't your jam? Don't whinge—just go away. Ace enby aphant WP in #NYC. they/them/gonzo/whatever If you would throw me and mine to the wolves so to claim victory over those wolves, you can take your Democratic National Chamberlain 🤡ass to someone else's mentions.
Am aware of pan and scan (cropping, selectively) and letterboxing. Both of which are addressed in OP.
Pan and scan requires someone make editorial decisions about what is seen through the window and what is cropped out. Letterboxing was often not acceptable to audiences, as you note.
For Saturday afternoon movies, especially on UHF channels, horizontal compression was a way to avoid sacrificing screen real estate without actually doing any editorial work. Another reply to this thread provides the term "anamorphic widescreen".
The question went to the impact, on later art, of folk growing up with such squashing of film for broadcast. Not to alternatives to such squashing, as if the lived experience of seeing such squashed films on television never happened. A non-responsive answer is non-responsive.
Conversation (2)
Loading comments...