Hacker, infosec nerd. Engineer & scientist, foodie, gadget geek, unabashedly blue in a red US state. I boost and toot on politics, tech, fascism — these may seem CWs for you. Undesired exposure to my activity on those subjects is a risk of following me. I would readily CW talking about violence, porn, or other triggers, but not politics. Feel free to block or mute me if that is egregious for you. Trying to leave the world better, not worse.
Hacker, infosec nerd. Engineer & scientist, foodie, gadget geek, unabashedly blue in a red US state. I boost and toot on politics, tech, fascism — these may seem CWs for you. Undesired exposure to my activity on those subjects is a risk of following me. I would readily CW talking about violence, porn, or other triggers, but not politics. Feel free to block or mute me if that is egregious for you. Trying to leave the world better, not worse.
The above serves as apt example: AI ‘read the tea leaves’ and said it was Edison, but kindly gave me a similar / better Bertrand Russell quote: “We all have a tendency to think that the world must conform to our prejudices. The opposite view involves some effort of thought, and most people would die sooner than think—in fact, they do so.” The first sentence nails describing what we risk, the second even carries a delicious double meaning. Russell gets credit. But QuoteInvestigator finds one nugget in a 1850s Harper’s article, the twist in an ag magazine in 1913, and our venerated three nowhere near it. https://quoteinvestigator.com/2018/09/23/think/
A system relying on statistical decisions to string sentences together will seek an average. The tall poppy gets snipped, myth is reinforced, and we slouch off toward mediocrity. Fuck.
Loading comments...