In reply to
Jay
@WhiteCatTamer@mastodon.online
I don’t know what I’m doing, either. I do a fair amount of boosting which, for me, means “this post has value”, so not necessarily that I agree with it. Following is open, no worries if you dip in and dip out. I tend to wait to follow until I’ve interacted with you a bit first.
mastodon.online
Jay
@WhiteCatTamer@mastodon.online
I don’t know what I’m doing, either. I do a fair amount of boosting which, for me, means “this post has value”, so not necessarily that I agree with it. Following is open, no worries if you dip in and dip out. I tend to wait to follow until I’ve interacted with you a bit first.
mastodon.online
@WhiteCatTamer@mastodon.online
·
Apr 10, 2026
@mattyws @danirabbit If you accept that the point of LLMs - not the hypothetically perfect FOSSified AI that someone’s brother is running in his garage using solar energy and training solely on works in the public domain, the kind that is being thrust into every sphere of life by companies worth hundreds of billions of dollars - is to extract talent and wealth from the masses by sheer force of economic momentum, then you would not call LLMs “just a tool”, which is contrary.
4
0
0
Loading comments...