plz1

400kbps would be slow as hell, for all of those use cases. Video would be unusable, but other stuff would still be insanely slow with all the bloat in modern websites and tracking crap in apps.

That article reads like a ChatGPT summary, though I’m not sure if that’s partially due to translation from German or not.

What penalty? What illegal thing are they even doing? If the browsers allow this, they should expect it to happen. Prevent it, or expect it. Websites shouldn't be able to "scan" for these extensions in the first place. At *best*, they might get a slap on the wrist fine they pay to the FTC or FCC, and admit no fault.

I know someone that did it once and having to have one of these as a result. Suggest you reset your opinions a bit.

Wow, this feels like a honeypot/data harvesting site than a call to action. Just contact your reps directly…

DIsbands USAID CHecks notes Re-builds USAID in full capitalism mode

Waterfox is on the same page. As long as the browser doesn’t outright require it to functio0n, I think the privacy-focused forks will remain. Of course, it’s extra work to maintain divergent code, but this is worth it, IMO.

My ten year old former Win10 gaming PC was recently reborn as a CachyOS Linux gaming PC, and I just finished playing through Clair Obscur on it. I did have to upgrade the video card, but I got the RTX 5050, well within your “second best” range target, since it’s technically their budget level card.

I tried the PWA route with Discord. It wouldn’t stay logged in, and acted generally janky. That said, I do PWA with any app that’s Electron, at least to try and avoid the RAM bloat.

Didn’t you hear? They retired the penny from production. :)