Stanford's Symbolic Systems Program is hiring a three-year lecturer position: https://academicjobsonline.org/ajo/program/29530
Michael Bernstein
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Posts
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Big congratulations to Helena Vasconcelos on winning a 2025 CRA Outstanding Undergraduate Researcher Award! https://cra.org/about/awards/outstanding-undergraduate-researcher-award/
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Coming very soon: #cscw2024 panel on "Is Human-AI Interaction CSCW?" alongside @asb@hci.social, @jbigham@hci.social, @andresmh@hci.social, and Merrie Morris!
https://programs.sigchi.org/cscw/2024/program/content/179232
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
@andresmh@hci.social @lindsay@hci.social @julian@fietkau.social yes, I think it’s also about everyone knowing that everyone has committed! I agree that providing the nudges for your friends would definitely work even better. “Hey Andrés, everyone wants to hear your hot take on…”
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
This paper argues that online spaces become ghost towns because it's too easy to lurk without contributing, and that asking people to regularly re-commit—or the incoming messages start getting muted—reverses the trend. arxiv.org/abs/2410.23267
It works! #cscw2024 paper by @lindsay@hci.social
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
You just got asked to review another paper; your third emoji is your review.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
@andresmh@hci.social Yes, the main difference is that the network is at best secondary and possibly just nonexistent. For example, you can follow on TikTok, but it's not a main driver of the FYP.
In theory, you can algorithmically rank any threaded design: spaces (Reddit), network (FB/Insta feed), or commons (TikTok FYP). Commons-based designs have few options beyond algorithmic ranking, though.
And yeah, when there's a bounded space, paid subscriptions to gain access is a clear metaphor.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
What unifies, and what distinguishes, social media designs? Are all the Twitter spinoffs actually meaningfully different designs from each other? Form-From is a design space from @axz@hci.social, myself, @karger@hci.social, and Mark Ackerman that will appear at #cscw2024 https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.05388
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
If you're interested in AI and social media, apply for this postdoc position at
Stanford: https://hci.stanford.edu/postdoc.php
Work with faculty including @Angelec@mastodon.social (Communication), Jeanne Tsai (Psych), Jeff Hancock (Communication), @jugander@sigmoid.social (MS&E), myself (CS), Nate Persily (Law), @RobbWiller (Sociology, Psychology, Business), and Tatsu Hashimoto (CS). Postdocs get joint mentorship by a pair of faculty.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
I've been wrestling with the gap between HCI curricula, which tend to focus on the design process, and the big theories and ideas that animate us in HCI. Here's a model that has starting working well here for me here at Stanford: @msbernst@medium.com
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Despite the promise of AIs improving human decision making, a frustratingly resilient research result has found that people with AI decision-making aids are no better than people alone or AIs alone. Why? Overreliance: we go along with the AI's recommendations even when we shouldn't. Even when explainable AIs try to make it clear when the AI is wrong!
[CSCW paper thread]
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.
Stanford CS prof, human-computer interaction and social computing. Surely I will be interesting and entertaining here, even though I failed to achieve this on Twitter.