Developer for Math Ed software co | Independent Research on Intelligence Amplification | What type of Dynamical Systems can be called Intelligent? | bboy hermit
Developer for Math Ed software co | Independent Research on Intelligence Amplification | What type of Dynamical Systems can be called Intelligent? | bboy hermit
Posts
Developer for Math Ed software co | Independent Research on Intelligence Amplification | What type of Dynamical Systems can be called Intelligent? | bboy hermit
Developer for Math Ed software co | Independent Research on Intelligence Amplification | What type of Dynamical Systems can be called Intelligent? | bboy hermit
Developer for Math Ed software co | Independent Research on Intelligence Amplification | What type of Dynamical Systems can be called Intelligent? | bboy hermit
@alexelcu@mastodon.social F# feels more functional because of HM types (OOP is usually irrelevant or annotating is beneficial, eg you really should annotate those types for clarity), currying and syntax around algebraic types. OOPs with functional core is very well integrated these days.
But highfalutin advanced type-based monad transformer etc functional programming is more straightforward to implement in scala.
But it seems this caused a schism in the scala community. Ultimately they are both excellent languages and the most well equipped (via platform) languages for functional programming..